Judge Bars Proof of Citizenship for Voting

[WEATHER53]

try and keep up

"A federal judge on Wednesday permanently barred President Donald Trump's administration from implementing most of his first executive order on elections, part of which sought to require people to show documentary proof of citizenship when they register to vote." - OP link

Yes you little insults and LOL and try and keep up are mere child like utterances with no adult material following

 

[Dante]

Of course. The Supreme Court has already said that federal district judges cannot pass laws affecting the entire country.

Court did not make a law and residents cannot make laws.

Oh wait! Dupe thread...

Post in thread 'Judge Bars Proof of Citizenship for Voting'

Wednesday at 2:56 PM

Dupe

• 1srelluc

• 
• 

 

[excalibur]

Identification which is required to enter a swimming pool is what is required and not a proof if Citizenship
Stop lying but you wont because truth does not help you

ID is required to enter the Øbama flak-tower library.

 

[task0778]

and while politics might be involved, that doesn't mean the judge shouldn't rule according to her interpretation of the law.

Yes it does. She is a DISTRICT COURT JUDGE intended to handle matters related to her DISTRICT, not the entire country. Our law never intended that a president must pass muster with the approval of 600 district judges on every matter he acts on. If there is a legality involved, that is what the Congress and SC are there for.

Regardless of who is in the White House, some challenges should be exercised to make sure he's staying in his lane.

Yes, by those who have co-equal power to the president, which is Congress and the SC. These actions imply a mere district judge appointed by Congress to handle local matters, has power which supersedes a president.


A challenge to a president's authority has to start in a federal district court and percolate up to the SCOTUS. They don't do squat until the lower courts have weighed in. Congress can pass legislation but the prez can veto it, so all they can do then is impeach him. It's gotta be the Judicial Branch that keeps a president in his lane so to speak, and that doesn't usually start at the top (SC); it starts in a federal district court and works it's way up.

It's not like the president can't appeal the decision to a higher court. What we're seeing here is just the beginning of the fight.

 

[ColonelAngus]

I am going to go to Tijuana and vote for their mayor!!

I am so tired of Burgueño's bullshit!!!

MAKE TIJUANA GREAT AGAIN!!!

 

[Care4all]

It’s ALL to smear Trump for a week with front page headlines and then the dismissal 6-18 months later is on page 33 for one day
The judges know that, the media knows that, and all are complicit with the TDS set.
I for one am Sick of Trumps tepid reactions

Can you please point to where in the Constitution the president is given the power to do this E/O with election processes? Can you point out, how this judge is wrong in her ruling?

Or are you disagreeing with the ruling for no constitutional reason, but simply to support Trump, at all cost?

What is your argument on why the ruling is incorrect?

 

[WEATHER53]

Yes it does. She is a DISTRICT COURT JUDGE intended to handle matters related to her DISTRICT, not the entire country. Our law never intended that a president must pass muster with the approval of 600 district judges on every matter he acts on. If there is a legality involved, that is what the Congress and SC are there for.


Yes, by those who have co-equal power to the president, which is Congress and the SC. These actions imply a mere district judge appointed by Congress to handle local matters, has power which supersedes a president.


A challenge to a president's authority has to start in a federal district court and percolate up to the SCOTUS. They don't do squat until the lower courts have weighed in. Congress can pass legislation but the prez can veto it, so all they can do then is impeach him. It's gotta be the Judicial Branch that keeps a president in his lane so to speak, and that doesn't usually start at the top (SC); it starts in a federal district court and works it's way up.

It's not like the president can't appeal the decision to a higher court. What we're seeing here is just the beginning of the fight.

Time to file obstruction charges as a class action against every usurper rogue in a robe

 

[DigitalDrifter]

Needs to be done legislatively. Unfortunately this means it will never happen.

Today's Dimocrats have ZERO respect for citizenship, so they would NEVER push for such a requirement, since they are more and more pushing for non-citizens to vote. Today they will of course claim they only want it for local elections, but it's simply a grooming tactic for the eventual goal of making it for all elections.

 

[Care4all]

Must be why several states are currently actively trying to make it legal for foreigners to vote.


The law requires states to turn over voter rolls to the Fed to review. If state rolls are so squeaky clean then why are several states breaking the law refusing to hand over their lists? Truth of the matter is that blue states never review their voting lists, never take dead people, etc., off lists. You all depend on having tons of invalid names on the rolls so you can use them to cheat.

There is no such law, it's an E/O by Trump. And they are not turning them over because there is private information on their citizens that the Feds have no right or authority, to have....it too is working its way through the courts....and the Doj has lost in several states so far....mostly through dismissal rulings because the Constitution leaves the administration of elections to the States.

 

[Care4all]

Trump tried to unconstitutionally get the SAVE ACT through via his own executive order, when Congress failed to get this Save Act bill passed in both houses. This is what was denied by the federal district court.

 

[Robert W]

Great! Now republicans can acquire votes from countries around the world who identify with liberty and freedom. I’ll start by getting millions of Japanese to vote in my local town council elections.

Federal judge bars Trump from implementing proof of citizenship requirement to vote

A federal judge on Wednesday permanently barred President Donald Trump’s administration from implementing most of his first executive order on elections, part of which sought to require people to show...

www.yahoo.com

Who manages the Government of the USA, Presidents, Congress or Judges?

Democrats Judges run this country. Republicans should have littered the country with Republican judges.

As the Trump administration faces substantial pushback in the courts, including an unprecedented wave of nationwide injunctions halting its policies, some are claiming that his opponents are tilting the scales of justice by selectively bringing their lawsuits before sympathetic courts in a practice called “forum shopping.” They note that three-quarters of the lower court justices who have blocked Trump policies were appointed by Democrats.

 

[Robert W]

There is no such law, it's an E/O by Trump. And they are not turning them over because there is private information on their citizens that the Feds have no right or authority, to have....it too is working its way through the courts....and the Doj has lost in several states so far....mostly through dismissal rulings because the Constitution leaves the administration of elections to the States.

As the Trump administration faces substantial pushback in the courts, including an unprecedented wave of nationwide injunctions halting its policies, some are claiming that his opponents are tilting the scales of justice by selectively bringing their lawsuits before sympathetic courts in a practice called “forum shopping.” They note that three-quarters of the lower court justices who have blocked Trump policies were appointed by Democrats.

 

[Care4all]

As the Trump administration faces substantial pushback in the courts, including an unprecedented wave of nationwide injunctions halting its policies, some are claiming that his opponents are tilting the scales of justice by selectively bringing their lawsuits before sympathetic courts in a practice called “forum shopping.” They note that three-quarters of the lower court justices who have blocked Trump policies were appointed by Democrats.

If that's true then 25% of trumps unconstitutional actions were blocked by Republican appointed judges, many appointed by Trump himself....which is a pretty good portion ...which simply says or implies, that Trump is way overreaching his constitutional power....imo.

 

[Nostra]

God forbid any of you read the article

Instead, she agreed that the Constitution gives states and Congress the authority to regulate elections, and that Trump's requirements violated the separation of powers.

The Constitution "does not grant the President any specific powers over elections," she wrote.

Incredible how many of you want a king.

The Constitution requires the President to defend it. Trump is defending the part that says voting is reserved for citizens of the US.

The judge is a moron hack.

 

[Robert W]

If that's true then 25% of trumps unconstitutional actions were blocked by Republican appointed judges, many appointed by Trump himself....which is a pretty good portion ...which simply says or implies, that Trump is way overreaching his constitutional power....imo.

America has unfortunately been taken over by Judges, claiming they do the correct job over Republicans in 75% of the cases.

 

[BlindBoo]

No one needs to invent a law saying that only American citizens should be voting in federal elections.

Because we already have such laws. I show ID every time I vote.

Same as no one should need to pass a law that an election being held on election day should not encompass people voting, counting and handing in ballots for a MONTH

Yes you would need Congress to pass such a law restricting the States and dictating the exact vote counting procedures they must follow.

 

[Robert W]

The Constitution requires the President to defend it. Trump is defending the part that says voting is reserved for citizens of the US.

The judge is a moron hack.

Will the Supreme court rescue Trump? I will say now that it will. Problem it may take until past the midterm elections. Till then Democrats rule the United States. Our king is Democrat Judges.

 

[Robert W]

Because we already have such laws. I show ID every time I vote.

Democrat lawmakers are working hard to put a stop to you showing ID.

 

[Nostra]

Can you please point to where in the Constitution the president is given the power to do this E/O with election processes? Can you point out, how this judge is wrong in her ruling?

Or are you disagreeing with the ruling for no constitutional reason, but simply to support Trump, at all cost?

What is your argument on why the ruling is incorrect?

Trump is defending the clause in the Constitution stating voting is reserved for US citizens, Simp. Part of his duties is to defend the Constitution.

Now, show us anything anywhere in the Constitution that says a District Judge gets to decide election rules and laws.

GO!

 

[WEATHER53]

America has unfortunately been taken over by Judges, claiming they do the correct job over Republicans in 75% of the cases.

0.5% of the judiciary is conspiring to smear and thwart Trump . 99.5% are not
These are detestable little rodents . They will be bug sprayed