WEATHER53
Diamond Member
- Apr 13, 2017
- 40,820
- 29,263
- 3,615
It’s like the mayor of Podunk decreeing what NYC must doAmerica has unfortunately been taken over by Judges, claiming they do the correct job over Republicans in 75% of the cases.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It’s like the mayor of Podunk decreeing what NYC must doAmerica has unfortunately been taken over by Judges, claiming they do the correct job over Republicans in 75% of the cases.
That's the first post of yours I have liked in a long time! Well done!God forbid any of you read the article
Instead, she agreed that the Constitution gives states and Congress the authority to regulate elections, and that Trump's requirements violated the separation of powers.
The Constitution "does not grant the President any specific powers over elections," she wrote.
Incredible how many of you want a king.
Nope! It is Trump who is trying every unconstitutional act after another that he can, to gain power for the Presidency....these unconstitutional grabs for power by Trump, is being challenged by mostly the States and civil rights groups.... It is Trump who is causing everything he E/Os to be challenged and in front of a judge.America has unfortunately been taken over by Judges, claiming they do the correct job over Republicans in 75% of the cases.
Good luck with that.Will the Supreme court rescue Trump? I will say now that it will. Problem it may take until past the midterm elections. Till then Democrats rule the United States. Our king is Democrat Judges.
Somebody needs to tell President Trump that Executive Orders only apply to the executive branch of the federal government and have no jurisdiction over state laws. That is a major fault that I do hold against his administration. Obama tried the same thing until SCOTUS smacked his pee-pee one too many times.No one needs to invent a law saying that only American citizens should be voting in federal elections. And the only way to know your elections are honest is to check ID. Same as no one should need to pass a law that an election being held on election day should not encompass people voting, counting and handing in ballots for a MONTH, especially when whole countries like France count their ballots in 6 hours.
If elections weren't run as total shams by democrats, there'd be no need for an EO.
Maybe we should pass a law, making illegal entry into this country a felony and a disqualifier from ever voting.
Getting laws passed requires effort and compromise. Trump hates both.Somebody needs to tell President Trump that Executive Orders only apply to the executive branch of the federal government and have no jurisdiction over state laws. That is a major fault that I do hold against his administration. Obama tried the same thing until SCOTUS smacked his pee-pee one too many times.
Federal legislation requires that only US citizens can register to vote in Federal elections. It's not like the President made that up.This is what happens when you try to legislate through EO. It requires Federal legislation.
And? If Congress had wanted this they would have supplied enabling legislation.Federal legislation requires that only US citizens can register to vote in Federal elections. It's not like the President made that up.
The Constitution doesn't count as precedent???She concluded that but has no precedent to confirm her feelings based “conclusion”
What is that legislation? Can you cite the US code? Wasn't that the entire purpose of the SAVE Act?Federal legislation requires that only US citizens can register to vote in Federal elections. It's not like the President made that up.
Yes, Trump is trampling privacy rights by making his lists.Great! Now republicans can acquire votes from countries around the world who identify with liberty and freedom. I’ll start by getting millions of Japanese to vote in my local town council elections.
![]()
Federal judge bars Trump from implementing proof of citizenship requirement to vote
A federal judge on Wednesday permanently barred President Donald Trump’s administration from implementing most of his first executive order on elections, part of which sought to require people to show...www.yahoo.com
The NVRA of 1993What is that legislation? Can you cite the US code?
Like the President's EO, the Save Act would reuqire documented proof of citizenship. There is nothing the NVRA of 1993 about voter IDWasn't that the entire purpose of the SAVE Act?
How is he trampling privacy rights?Yes, Trump is trampling privacy rights by making his lists.
The National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (NVRA), also known as the Motor Voter Act, is a federal law aimed at increasing voter registration and participation in elections. Signed into law by President Bill Clinton on May 20, 1993, it requires states to offer voter registration services at the same time as applying for or renewing a driver's license or other state services. The NVRA also aims to protect the integrity of the electoral process by making it more difficult for states to remove individuals from voter registration lists .The NVRA of 1993
Like the President's EO, the Save Act would reuqire documented proof of citizenship. There is nothing the NVRA of 1993 about voter ID
You can't get Medicare without proving your id to them.The NVRA of 1993
Like the President's EO, the Save Act would reuqire documented proof of citizenship. There is nothing the NVRA of 1993 about voter ID
A federal judge blocked the Trump administration's effort to use a centralized database of Americans' personal information to purge voter rolls, ruling that the initiative unlawfully "trampled" on citizen privacy rights. [1, 2]How is he trampling privacy rights?
Give us some examples.
Bullshit, they signed me up without my consent and charged me for it.You can't get Medicare without proving your id to them.
How did you prove to them it was really you?Bullshit, they signed me up without my consent and charged me for it.