January 6 Was Not A Coup

Just because you can't answer the question doesn't mean you have to get snippy.

Why should I bother with an absurd question from a retard? All you did was expose you're too ignorant to discuss this with. Too stupid to know some members of the Trump cult have already been convicted of seditious conspiracy. Too mentally disabled to know some others are still facing charges of seditious conspiracy. Too dimwitted to just Google seditious conspiracy to see it is indeed a law. So why should I waste time on that? We both know had I enlightened you, then you would simply slide from, it's not a law, to the standard rightarded defense of, nuh-uh, he didn't try to delay Congress from counting the electoral votes.
 
Why should I bother with an absurd question from a retard? All you did was expose you're too ignorant to discuss this with. Too stupid to know some members of the Trump cult have already been convicted of seditious conspiracy. Too mentally disabled to know some others are still facing charges of seditious conspiracy. Too dimwitted to just Google seditious conspiracy to see it is indeed a law. So why should I waste time on that? We both know had I enlightened you, then you would simply slide from, it's not a law, to the standard rightarded defense of, nuh-uh, he didn't try to delay Congress from counting the electoral votes.

What others?

What laws were broken?

You mad bro?

Yeah, you mad.

Also, please go eat a dick.
 
Trump can look into possible election fraud all he wants to this day until he is bluish-orange in the face. The question you should ask is why didn’t he?

Trump broke the law when he conspired with others including members of Congress to obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the Joint Session of Congress set forth in the CONSTITUTION to occur on every January 6th following a presidential election for the purpose of counting the certified slates of electors from each state.

Here is

18 U.S. Code § 1505 - Obstruction of proceedings​

law;

Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States, or the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress—

Shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331), imprisoned not more than 8 years,

So who did he threaten, and threaten them with what?
 
Still no line between Trump and the rioters…IOW, nothing but you being upset that anyone was upset with the steal.
Don't need it... That is a burden of proof you are looking for...

Trump was clearly told the Election was fair... (while this is important, criminally it might not matter)

Trump know the mob were armed and said that they were not here to harm him...

He then told that mob that they had to goto the Capitol and fight. Knowing they were armed this is inciting violence...

He then saw the violence and did nothing to stop it, this is dereliction of duty but I doubt that crime would be easy prove (but the defence could be interesting)...

So the line is clear, he was in front of them and told them to do it... On top of that many of his staff knew that violence was expected...

We also have the 'stand by' comment from Trump as well... That sure sounds like an order... Thing is, if nothing happened then there would be nothing for Trump to answer for... But Trump looked like he was commanding the Proud boys in the media...
 
Don't need it... That is a burden of proof you are looking for...

Trump was clearly told the Election was fair... (while this is important, criminally it might not matter)

Trump know the mob were armed and said that they were not here to harm him...

He then told that mob that they had to goto the Capitol and fight. Knowing they were armed this is inciting violence...

He then saw the violence and did nothing to stop it, this is dereliction of duty but I doubt that crime would be easy prove (but the defence could be interesting)...

So the line is clear, he was in front of them and told them to do it... On top of that many of his staff knew that violence was expected...

We also have the 'stand by' comment from Trump as well... That sure sounds like an order... Thing is, if nothing happened then there would be nothing for Trump to answer for... But Trump looked like he was commanding the Proud boys in the media...

Nothing but opinion, conjecture, and outright wrong assumptions.


Or to put it more simply:

200.gif
 
A plan with no chance of success cannot be called a plan.
It had a chance alright..

If Pence was taken out of Washington then Trump could have declared Marshal law...

It doesn't matter... Judges don't say the plan was stupid therefore you are free to go... Ever see World's Dumbest Criminals?

If I was a Trump Supporter that would be the saddest thing of all...
 
It had a chance alright..

If Pence was taken out of Washington then Trump could have declared Marshal law...

It doesn't matter... Judges don't say the plan was stupid therefore you are free to go... Ever see World's Dumbest Criminals?

If I was a Trump Supporter that would be the saddest thing of all...

More if could might maybe sorta woulda coulda bullshit.

Take your meds, or up the dose.
 
Don't need it... That is a burden of proof you are looking for...

Trump was clearly told the Election was fair... (while this is important, criminally it might not matter)

Trump know the mob were armed and said that they were not here to harm him...

He then told that mob that they had to goto the Capitol and fight. Knowing they were armed this is inciting violence...

He then saw the violence and did nothing to stop it, this is dereliction of duty but I doubt that crime would be easy prove (but the defence could be interesting)...

So the line is clear, he was in front of them and told them to do it... On top of that many of his staff knew that violence was expected...

We also have the 'stand by' comment from Trump as well... That sure sounds like an order... Thing is, if nothing happened then there would be nothing for Trump to answer for... But Trump looked like he was commanding the Proud boys in the media...

God what a reach. Trump told the attendees they were going to march to the Capital peacefully and patriotically. Trump didn't know if anybody was armed. I don't recall seeing a any video of Trump searching people. A President still has constitutional rights such as free speech and assembally. Yea, I know how you commies hate the Constitution. No, Trump didn't stop the violence because we don't have phone booths anymore where he could have changed into his Super Trump outfit, and fly to the capital to stop those people.

I hope you know revenge is sweet. I can't wait until the Republicans takeover Congress so we can do the same things to Piglosi that the Communists are trying to do to Trump.
 
What others?

What laws were broken?

You mad bro?

Yeah, you mad.

Also, please go eat a dick.

LOLOL

I highlight how ignorant you are, not knowing about 20 people or so have been charged, and some already convicted, with a law you don't know exists, and all that does is bring out your own homo-erotic fantasies.

:lmao:

A shame you're into gay porn instead of keeping up with real news.
 
LOLOL

I highlight how ignorant you are, not knowing about 20 people or so have been charged, and some already convicted, with a law you don't know exists, and all that does is bring out your own homo-erotic fantasies.

:lmao:

A shame you're into gay porn instead of keeping up with real news.

By those show trials?

LOL.

Again, what laws did Trump break?
 
Nothing but opinion, conjecture, and outright wrong assumptions.


Or to put it more simply:

200.gif

Credible witnesses so far...

We have him saying other things in front of a camera...

It is not opinion that trump wanted to goto the Capitol...

He definitely said to his mob of heavily armed supporters that they need to fight and that is what they did..,

The problem you got is Trump said that he thought the election was illegal... Therefore the motive is already proven.

Even if he thinks he is right, he went about trying to regain it by illegal means...

By the way, this is not the DOJ yet... No arrests just yet, wait until the DOJ gets involved..
 
Credible witnesses so far...

We have him saying other things in front of a camera...

It is not opinion that trump wanted to goto the Capitol...

He definitely said to his mob of heavily armed supporters that they need to fight and that is what they did..,

The problem you got is Trump said that he thought the election was illegal... Therefore the motive is already proven.

Even if he thinks he is right, he went about trying to regain it by illegal means...

By the way, this is not the DOJ yet... No arrests just yet, wait until the DOJ gets involved..

"credible"

Just like the last hearsay ditz your side put up?

"just wait"

1.5 years later, just keep waiting.


Sucker.
 
God what a reach. Trump told the attendees they were going to march to the Capital peacefully and patriotically. Trump didn't know if anybody was armed. I don't recall seeing a any video of Trump searching people. A President still has constitutional rights such as free speech and assembally. Yea, I know how you commies hate the Constitution. No, Trump didn't stop the violence because we don't have phone booths anymore where he could have changed into his Super Trump outfit, and fly to the capital to stop those people.

I hope you know revenge is sweet. I can't wait until the Republicans takeover Congress so we can do the same things to Piglosi that the Communists are trying to do to Trump.
You didn't watch the hearing. Trump knew the protesters right outside of the Ellipse area were armed, and that's why they did not come in, because the magnetometers caught and would catch their armour.

Trump didn't want the cameras to show a half empty ellipse rally area, and asked secret service and security to let them in anyway, remove the MAGS, so they could come in, and fill the space, and said he was not afraid of them having guns, the guns were not to harm him.
 
He's claiming executive privilege.... for anyone who talked with him on 1/6 or before 1/6 regarding the election.

He's also paying for staffers testifying, lawyers....so they don't tell us too much....
paying for staffers testifying, lawyers - Is this not obstruction of justice?

These were in most cases ex-federal employees. How can someone involved in there case pay their legal fees when they were all working for the Government?
 
Not at all. What law did Trump supposedly break?

There should be a US Code number attached to whatever you accuse him of.

Holyfuckingshit. :eusa_doh:

You're even more retarded than I thought.

Again, retard, asked and answered. See post #757
 
God what a reach. Trump told the attendees they were going to march to the Capital peacefully and patriotically. Trump didn't know if anybody was armed. I don't recall seeing a any video of Trump searching people. A President still has constitutional rights such as free speech and assembally. Yea, I know how you commies hate the Constitution. No, Trump didn't stop the violence because we don't have phone booths anymore where he could have changed into his Super Trump outfit, and fly to the capital to stop those people.

I hope you know revenge is sweet. I can't wait until the Republicans takeover Congress so we can do the same things to Piglosi that the Communists are trying to do to Trump.

:cuckoo:
 

Forum List

Back
Top