January 6 Was Not A Coup

[MizMolly]

All of this still is not a coup or an insurrection.


CHAZ/CHOP was an actual Insurrection.

An ATTEMPTED coup

 

[easyt65]

You are distraught because Cassidy Hutchinson testified, under oath, to both her personal conversations and experiences.

She also related events and statements others had told her about.

Those others are welcome to also testify under oath, and corroborate or contest what she has said they said.

And it was debunked / refuted / holes poked in it ... there are literally calls for the committee to end because of this 'hoax'...

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

No, you're not.

You wouldn't know. You're a magaturd.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

An ATTEMPTED coup

Just like a lemonade stand is legally selling goods without a license. If CHAZ/CHOP was supposed be a legitimate government 'coup', then it has to be the shittiest 'coup' ever attempted.

No, wait, I'm sorry, but new info has come to light. No, no it would seem Jan 6 still holds the banner of 'Shittiest Insurrection EVAR!'

So close.

 

[easyt65]

You wouldn't know. You're a magaturd.

Wrong again, dumbass.

Fail.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

Wrong again, dumbass.

Fail.

So saucy when I verbally spank you.once again... Assfucks like you don't possess a sense of humor. It's actually funny to some.

 

[j-mac]

If you need to pretend that all those Republicn officeholders and Trump regime operatives are just being mean to the Lardass Loser, good luck with that.

The insecure blowhard is especially vulnerable to paranoid delusion whenever truths concerning him are being exposed. I hope no one is exploiting that.

View attachment 664124
"She has a tattoo of DeSantis on her left buttock."



View attachment 664125​

What I believe is that Trump wouldn’t have this country in the mess your drooling fool has us now.

 

[schmidlap]

And it was debunked / refuted / holes poked in it ...

The fatwa by the weird worshipers, entirely predictable, is confined to their entertainment echo chamber pot.

The sworn testimony has not been disputed by anyone in any legal venue.

It Cipollone, Meadows, and others finally develop the courage to come clean under oath, they can be sworn in and testify before the
U.S. House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol.

 

[schmidlap]

What I believe is that Trump wouldn’t have this country in the mess your drooling fool has us now.

Weird worshipers have their dogma,of course.

 

[schmidlap]

... it would seem Jan 6 still holds the banner of 'Shittiest Insurrection EVAR!'

Typical Trump operation.

We could be witnessing the stenchy death throes of Trumpery. It's not a pretty sight.

Donald Trump Stalwarts Finally Turn On Him After Hutchinson's Testimony

Mick Mulvaney, Trump's former Acting Chief of Staff, explicitly stated that he can no longer support Trump in the wake of Hutchinson's testimony.​

​

Sarah Matthews, a deputy press secretary in the Trump administration, tweeted that those who are attempting to downplay Hutchinson's role or her access in the West Wing "either doesn't understand how the Trump WH worked or is attempting to discredit her because they're scared of how damning this testimony is."​

​

... Fox News anchor Bret Baier described Hutchinson's claims as "compelling" while highlighting the alleged quote from Meadows, stating Trump "doesn't care" that his supporters were chanting "hang Mike Pence" at the Capitol because he believes the then-vice president "deserves it."​

​

Baier went on to dismiss the series of posts Trump wrote on Truth Social while Hutchinson was delivering her testimony—which in itself was another sign the former president was aware how damaging her claims were.​

​

"Cassie Hutchinson is under oath on Capitol Hill. The president is on Truth Social making his statements," Baier said...​

​

Conservative lawyer and frequent Fox News contributor Andrew McCarthy wrote an opinion piece for the Murdoch-owned New York Post arguing that the case to charge Trump with a crime "appears to be getting stronger" following Hutchinson's testimony...​

​

"The significance of White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson's testimony is that it shows Trump knew, in the moments before he took to the podium to give his rambunctious Ellipse speech, that the mob was armed to the teeth, including with firearms," McCarthy wrote.​

​

"He knew an armed mob would be headed to the Hill. Yet, he intentionally whipped them up with his speech. What's more, he intended personally to lead the protest march.​

​

"The stronger the evidence becomes that Trump intended to use the intimidating threat of armed violence to his advantage, the higher the likelihood that he will be indicted."​

​

The Washington Examiner, another right-wing news outlet, published an editorial arguing that Hutchinson's testimony shows that Trump is "unfit to be anywhere near power ever again."​

​

"Trump is a disgrace. Republicans have far better options to lead the party in 2024. No one should think otherwise, much less support him, ever again," the piece added.​

​

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...sons-testimony/ar-AAZ1G7D?ocid=BingNewsSearch​

​

Pasquale Cipollone could well become the John Dean of Trumpery.

"Aw, phooey!
Bring me some ketchup!"​

 

[Faun]

What Trump was suggesting had been done before….

Nope, no VP ever unilaterally rejected legit electors.

 

[Faun]

So it’s just characterization assassination

Like the Watergate hearings, right?

 

[easyt65]

The sworn testimony has not been disputed by anyone in any legal venue.

Because the 'SS' trial leaders will not let them testify. What do you not inderstand aboyt that?

How incompeyent, how corrupt do you have to be, to hear hearsay testimony about the Secret Service, allow the testimony, but NEVER follow up with the Secret Service yo confirm the testimony is true?

Snowflake, you have the IQ of a rock...or just like being lied to and used.

 

[schmidlap]

Because the 'SS' trial leaders will not let them testify.

You are still confused. There is no 'trial' yet.

Pasquale Cipollone, Mark Meadows, et al can agree to testify under oath to confirm or dispute her testimony at anytime.

 

[easyt65]

You are still confused. There is no 'trial' yet.

Pasquale Cipollone, Mark Meadows, et al can agree to testify under oath to confirm or dispute her testimony at anytime.

This whole thi g has been a 1-sided SHOW 'trial', snowflake ... a massive Kabuki Theater production, to include a hired producer.

The fact that you still bdlieve this is somehow a 'fair & balanced investigation' after it has been proven to be a hoax just shows you are an indoctrinated sheep.

 

[schmidlap]

This whole thi g has been a 1-sided SHOW 'trial', snowflake ... a massive Kabuki Theater production, to include a hired producer.

The fact that you still bdlieve this is somehow a 'fair & balanced investigation' after it has been proven to be a hoax just shows you are an indoctrinated sheep.

I can understand why Mulvaney and so many other Trump bum kissers are finally abandoning the Loser's sinking manure barge, and why so many Americans now want to see him charged.

The U.S. House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol has performed an admirable public service.

Do you think that Pasquale Cipollone will agree to come clean?

Professor of Communication Jennifer Mercieca outlined how Trump has a history of using rhetoric in “anti-democratic ways,” including spreading conspiracy, attacking his opponents and denying inconvenient facts.​

​

“His rhetoric is important because the viability of his whole plot required public support,” Mercieca said. “Trump kept pushing his conspiracy, and threatening and bullying anyone who wouldn’t go along with him.”​

​

Her expert testimony was requested earlier this year by a researcher from the committee tasked with scrutinizing the circumstances around the attack, during which insurrectionists stormed the Capitol in an attempt to impede the validation of the 2020 presidential election results.​

​

Mercieca has watched and analyzed each of the hearings. So far, she said, the committee has established that Trump lost the election, knew that he lost, and yet he and his allies “attacked different aspects of our election system.” He did this at the state level, in the courts, by putting pressure on Congress and by urging then-Vice President Mike Pence to go along with a plan to overturn his election defeat.​

​

The committee has also focused on Trump’s use of what Mercieca calls “conspiracy rhetoric” and threats and intimidation against Pence.​

​

“Trump was relentless. He absolutely refused to accept that he had lost the election, even though all of his staff told him that he had lost and over 60 court cases had determined that he lost,” she said. “Trump has constantly said that he hates being a ‘loser’ more than anything. He just couldn’t allow himself to admit that he lost the presidency.”​

​

​

(Clinton, for whom 2.8 million more Americans had voted,
gave a gracious concession speech immediately.)​

 

[berg80]

What I believe is that Trump wouldn’t have this country in the mess your drooling fool has us now.

Ironically, Trump is the cause of much of the mess we find ourselves in.

 

[berg80]

Do you think that Pasquale Cipollone will agree to come clean?

The answer likely lies in the extent of immunity extended to Pat by the DoJ.

 

[Mac1958]

Just like a lemonade stand is legally selling goods without a license. If CHAZ/CHOP was supposed be a legitimate government 'coup', then it has to be the shittiest 'coup' ever attempted.
No, wait, I'm sorry, but new info has come to light. No, no it would seem Jan 6 still holds the banner of 'Shittiest Insurrection EVAR!'

Any nutter can say that anything isn't anything. Denying the obvious is a great American pastime.

It's a specialty of both ends. All that does is identify them as nutters.

 

[schmidlap]

The answer likely lies in the extent of immunity extended to Pat by the DoJ.

Given Cipollone's resistance to the more egregious escapades upon the sinking manure barge, I'm sure he will be cut some slack.