Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
So, Cassidy Hutchinson's account has not been refuted by anyone willing to swear to what they say.Did I mention anything about under oath?
The demoscum won't let anyone who can refute it testify.So, Cassidy Hutchinson's account has not been refuted by anyone willing to swear to what they say.
She was under oath, as were all other Republican witnesses who provided damning testimony before the
The U.S. House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol.
Predictable, the Trump shit-flingers are already targeting her:
Sworn testimony by Republicans is not exclusive to the U.S. House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol, but I'm sure they would be happy to hear from Mark Meadows, Pat Cipollone, and others.The demoscum won't let anyone who can refute it testify.
Oh yeah, commie, I'll call him up right now! LolSworn testimony by Republicans is not exclusive to the U.S. House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol, but I'm sure they would be happy to hear from Mark Meadows, Pat Cipollone, and others.
Tell them to man up and take an oath.
You are distraught because Cassidy Hutchinson testified, under oath, to both her personal conversations and experiences.Oh yeah, commie, I'll call him up right now! Lol
Never said she didn’t work in the W wing….where did you get that? Voices in your head?You know the Loser is in trouble when he starts raving inanely that he "hardly knows" an aide that had worked in the West Wing a few feet from his Offal Orifice.
“Anyone downplaying Cassidy Hutchinson’s role or her access in the West Wing either doesn’t understand how the Trump [White House] worked or is attempting to discredit her because they’re scared of how damning this testimony is,” former White House deputy press secretary Sarah Matthews
None applicable in a court…You are distraught because Cassidy Hutchinson testified, under oath, to both her personal conversations and experiences.
She also related events and statements others had told her about.
Those others are welcome to also testify under oath, and corroborate or contest what she has said they said.
What Trump was suggesting had been done before….Was there a coup attempt on January 6? For the answer to be “yes,” there had to have been a realistic path by which some action on that day could have resulted in Donald Trump remaining president of the United States.
The answer is "yes." Had Pence gone along with Trump's plan, Trump would have remained president.
Lock him up!
I'm not distraught, you are a liarYou are distraught because Cassidy Hutchinson testified, under oath, to both her personal conversations and experiences.
She also related events and statements others had told her about.
Those others are welcome to also testify under oath, and corroborate or contest what she has said they said.
Your silly ad hominems fail to confront sworn testimony that has not been refuted.I'm not distraught, you are a liar
Don't be paranoid. I never said you swallowed Trump claiming that he hardly knew her.Never said she didn’t work in the W wing….where did you get that? Voices in your head?
No one is "in a court."None applicable in a court…
Typical leftist babble. This will be gone by Monday and then you filth will be crying over the next fake BS.Your silly ad hominems fail to confront sworn testimony that has not been refuted.
Since Hutchinson testified that she had learned of Trump's tantrum in the vehicle from Tony Ornato, Trump’s deputy chief of staff, and Robert Engel, the special agent in charge for Secret Service on Jan. 6, it is appropriate for them to testify what they told her, and how they were aware of it.
If that upsets you, that is unfortunate.
Oooo! You're in such a snit over so many Republicans testifying under oath!Typical leftist babble. This will be gone by Monday and then you filth will be crying over the next fake BS.
So it’s just characterization assassinationNo one is "in a court."
Do you think that Meadows and/or Cipollone will come clean, under oath, before the U.S. House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol?
So many Republicans have complied, and been very informative.
If you need to pretend that all those Republicn officeholders and Trump regime operatives are just being mean to the Lardass Loser, good luck with that.So it’s just characterization assassination
No, I'm way funnier.This isn't the 1st time you idiots have troed to tell me how I sound, what I think, how I feel, etc...
...and you are almost as funny as the 6 Jan Commitee's self-humiliating week.
No, you're not.No, I'm way funnier.
