Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Indeed, lefties will have to exploit the meaning of armed insurrection if they want to push that narrative. Yet another example of what the opening post is about. Why does the left exaggerate so much?Armed doesn't exclusively mean armed with a firearm. It means armed (as in to carry) with a weapon and we saw in the video footage a variety of items that were used as weapons including the Capitol police's shields, flag pools, pepper/bear spray, etc.
Still an insurrectionIndeed, lefties will have to exploit the meaning of armed insurrection if they want to push that narrative. Yet another example of what the opening post is about. Why does the left exaggerate so much?Armed doesn't exclusively mean armed with a firearm. It means armed (as in to carry) with a weapon and we saw in the video footage a variety of items that were used as weapons including the Capitol police's shields, flag pools, pepper/bear spray, etc.
You prove again to be an idiot to think her size matters. It was the mob that mattered. She just happened to be the one leading the charge towards the House chamber with members of Congress holed up.No, she tried to lead a violent mob past a police barricade and into a restricted area where lawmakers were hiding from them.You have seen the video of her climbing through the window of a barricaded door, right?Great... hope someone breaks down the front door to your house. I know you'll ask them to please not "trespass" and not think about doing them bodily harm.Oh bullshit. So should he have shot the next person through?Lets see, a cop was killed, 140 other cops were injured.The video of the insurrectionist getting shot shows her climbing through a window. You're lying. Again.Originally, I read that the cost was over 2 Billion dollars in damage and 6 people died. At least that's what the legacy media said. Then, they are silently walking that back. Facts show however: one person was killed. Ashli Babbitt. Killed by a nameless DC COP that shot through a door. And the actual cost, hard to find, but I found it was more like half a million. Why does the media and the Democrats continually exaggerate and focus on IT and ignore and downplay the cost monetarily and in lives of the ongoing damage done in the last year of race riots THEY supported?
She did not threaten anyone's life. Why was deadly force necessary?
Yes it was.
Lets go back in time....
View attachment 490367
Funny how you seem to change your position based on who was shot.
It's sad to see you turn into a dishonest pile of dung. First, it wasn't a case for "stand your ground" because it wasn't in a home and the policeman was not directly threatened by the woman.
During a riot.Second, even with "stand your ground", there has to be circumstances where a reasonable person would feel threatened. Breaking in a window in a public building in broad daylight is not such a circumstance.
Yeah..to call you a dishonest pile of dung is to offend piles of dung everywhere.
Someone's going to dance with a needle in Terre Haute for killing a cop.A cop died (stroke) but not near her. Cops were injured and people should go to jail over that, but there's nothing that indicates the woman was involved in any of that. So, your false equivalency falls flat. And, while I'm willing to give you the benefit of the doubt and not cast you into irrelevancy, if your comment was an attempt by to slyly imply I'm racist, fuck you very much.
It wasn't to imply you're a racist. It was to imply that since you agreed with Babbitt's politics, you don't think the shooting was justified. If you owned a store and had an armed security guard and someone busted the window to come into the store...you'd be screaming for the guard to shoot the person coming through the window. You know it. I know it. You, in no way, would tell them, "Well, they don't mean you any harm". If you want to say something different, it will just further cement your status as being as delusional as you are dishonest. Fuck YOU very much.
So shooting unarmed people for trespass during a riot is justified, GOT IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You might want to inform BLM and ANTIFA of the rule change.
.
Damn, two replies to one post, are you getting that senile But if they break down my door, they'll have done more that just trespass. As far as anyone knows, Babbitt didn't break anything or threaten anyone with great bodily harm.
.
Did she break the window, or display a weapon?
Yeah, I can see how some affirmative action hire, BLM supporter, cop would find an unarmed 5'2" petite blond a serious threat. Such an imposing sight that must have been.
.
Great... hope someone breaks down the front door to your house. I know you'll ask them to please not "trespass" and not think about doing them bodily harm.Oh bullshit. So should he have shot the next person through?Lets see, a cop was killed, 140 other cops were injured.The video of the insurrectionist getting shot shows her climbing through a window. You're lying. Again.Originally, I read that the cost was over 2 Billion dollars in damage and 6 people died. At least that's what the legacy media said. Then, they are silently walking that back. Facts show however: one person was killed. Ashli Babbitt. Killed by a nameless DC COP that shot through a door. And the actual cost, hard to find, but I found it was more like half a million. Why does the media and the Democrats continually exaggerate and focus on IT and ignore and downplay the cost monetarily and in lives of the ongoing damage done in the last year of race riots THEY supported?
She did not threaten anyone's life. Why was deadly force necessary?
Yes it was.
Lets go back in time....
View attachment 490367
Funny how you seem to change your position based on who was shot.
It's sad to see you turn into a dishonest pile of dung. First, it wasn't a case for "stand your ground" because it wasn't in a home and the policeman was not directly threatened by the woman.
During a riot.Second, even with "stand your ground", there has to be circumstances where a reasonable person would feel threatened. Breaking in a window in a public building in broad daylight is not such a circumstance.
Yeah..to call you a dishonest pile of dung is to offend piles of dung everywhere.
Someone's going to dance with a needle in Terre Haute for killing a cop.A cop died (stroke) but not near her. Cops were injured and people should go to jail over that, but there's nothing that indicates the woman was involved in any of that. So, your false equivalency falls flat. And, while I'm willing to give you the benefit of the doubt and not cast you into irrelevancy, if your comment was an attempt by to slyly imply I'm racist, fuck you very much.
It wasn't to imply you're a racist. It was to imply that since you agreed with Babbitt's politics, you don't think the shooting was justified. If you owned a store and had an armed security guard and someone busted the window to come into the store...you'd be screaming for the guard to shoot the person coming through the window. You know it. I know it. You, in no way, would tell them, "Well, they don't mean you any harm". If you want to say something different, it will just further cement your status as being as delusional as you are dishonest. Fuck YOU very much.
So shooting unarmed people for trespass during a riot is justified, GOT IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You might want to inform BLM and ANTIFA of the rule change.
.
Damn, two replies to one post, are you getting that senile But if they break down my door, they'll have done more that just trespass. As far as anyone knows, Babbitt didn't break anything or threaten anyone with great bodily harm.
.
Perhaps your dumbest post to date ^
No small achievement!
The video title is a lie, I watched 3 times and listened very closely, she never uttered the word "storm". Why do you commie propagandist insist on lying?
Who said she said "storm" in that video?
Read the title moron. Do you need to be spoon fed everything?
.
You guys are legalized insurrectionists. You are the tyranny. You use social justice gone amok as a front for the death and destruction that is coming. Near your whole party is in that direction. A lot of Repubs are also. The congress person Cheyney is but one. She may have been replaced with another in her committee. We will see. There are people who screw with others. And you are right to bring it up. They are on all sides and all types of people. There are many that have not been brought to justice for what they have done to others. And they deserve to be punished for destroying others. But it seems the whole nation will go down if we keep this up.Still an insurrectionIndeed, lefties will have to exploit the meaning of armed insurrection if they want to push that narrative. Yet another example of what the opening post is about. Why does the left exaggerate so much?Armed doesn't exclusively mean armed with a firearm. It means armed (as in to carry) with a weapon and we saw in the video footage a variety of items that were used as weapons including the Capitol police's shields, flag pools, pepper/bear spray, etc.
An irate mob can be quite a force
Great... hope someone breaks down the front door to your house. I know you'll ask them to please not "trespass" and not think about doing them bodily harm.Oh bullshit. So should he have shot the next person through?Lets see, a cop was killed, 140 other cops were injured.The video of the insurrectionist getting shot shows her climbing through a window. You're lying. Again.Originally, I read that the cost was over 2 Billion dollars in damage and 6 people died. At least that's what the legacy media said. Then, they are silently walking that back. Facts show however: one person was killed. Ashli Babbitt. Killed by a nameless DC COP that shot through a door. And the actual cost, hard to find, but I found it was more like half a million. Why does the media and the Democrats continually exaggerate and focus on IT and ignore and downplay the cost monetarily and in lives of the ongoing damage done in the last year of race riots THEY supported?
She did not threaten anyone's life. Why was deadly force necessary?
Yes it was.
Lets go back in time....
View attachment 490367
Funny how you seem to change your position based on who was shot.
It's sad to see you turn into a dishonest pile of dung. First, it wasn't a case for "stand your ground" because it wasn't in a home and the policeman was not directly threatened by the woman.
During a riot.Second, even with "stand your ground", there has to be circumstances where a reasonable person would feel threatened. Breaking in a window in a public building in broad daylight is not such a circumstance.
Yeah..to call you a dishonest pile of dung is to offend piles of dung everywhere.
Someone's going to dance with a needle in Terre Haute for killing a cop.A cop died (stroke) but not near her. Cops were injured and people should go to jail over that, but there's nothing that indicates the woman was involved in any of that. So, your false equivalency falls flat. And, while I'm willing to give you the benefit of the doubt and not cast you into irrelevancy, if your comment was an attempt by to slyly imply I'm racist, fuck you very much.
It wasn't to imply you're a racist. It was to imply that since you agreed with Babbitt's politics, you don't think the shooting was justified. If you owned a store and had an armed security guard and someone busted the window to come into the store...you'd be screaming for the guard to shoot the person coming through the window. You know it. I know it. You, in no way, would tell them, "Well, they don't mean you any harm". If you want to say something different, it will just further cement your status as being as delusional as you are dishonest. Fuck YOU very much.
So shooting unarmed people for trespass during a riot is justified, GOT IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You might want to inform BLM and ANTIFA of the rule change.
.
Damn, two replies to one post, are you getting that senile But if they break down my door, they'll have done more that just trespass. As far as anyone knows, Babbitt didn't break anything or threaten anyone with great bodily harm.
.
Perhaps your dumbest post to date ^
No small achievement!
The video title is a lie, I watched 3 times and listened very closely, she never uttered the word "storm". Why do you commie propagandist insist on lying?
Who said she said "storm" in that video?
Read the title moron. Do you need to be spoon fed everything?
.
Moron, the word "storm" is not in quotes. The title references her saying how that mob of 3 million were marching to the Capitol.
Armed doesn't exclusively mean armed with a firearm. It means armed (as in to carry) with a weapon and we saw in the video footage a variety of items that were used as weapons including the Capitol police's shields, flag pools, pepper/bear spray, etc.Lol, I heard it was an "armed" insurrection. Only problem though, is that there were not any guns found.Originally, I read that the cost was over 2 Billion dollars in damage and 6 people died. At least that's what the legacy media said. Then, they are silently walking that back. Facts show however: one person was killed. Ashli Babbitt. Killed by a nameless DC COP that shot through a door. And the actual cost, hard to find, but I found it was more like half a million. Why does the media and the Democrats continually exaggerate and focus on IT and ignore and downplay the cost monetarily and in lives of the ongoing damage done in the last year of race riots THEY supported?
Great... hope someone breaks down the front door to your house. I know you'll ask them to please not "trespass" and not think about doing them bodily harm.Oh bullshit. So should he have shot the next person through?Lets see, a cop was killed, 140 other cops were injured.The video of the insurrectionist getting shot shows her climbing through a window. You're lying. Again.Originally, I read that the cost was over 2 Billion dollars in damage and 6 people died. At least that's what the legacy media said. Then, they are silently walking that back. Facts show however: one person was killed. Ashli Babbitt. Killed by a nameless DC COP that shot through a door. And the actual cost, hard to find, but I found it was more like half a million. Why does the media and the Democrats continually exaggerate and focus on IT and ignore and downplay the cost monetarily and in lives of the ongoing damage done in the last year of race riots THEY supported?
She did not threaten anyone's life. Why was deadly force necessary?
Yes it was.
Lets go back in time....
View attachment 490367
Funny how you seem to change your position based on who was shot.
It's sad to see you turn into a dishonest pile of dung. First, it wasn't a case for "stand your ground" because it wasn't in a home and the policeman was not directly threatened by the woman.
During a riot.Second, even with "stand your ground", there has to be circumstances where a reasonable person would feel threatened. Breaking in a window in a public building in broad daylight is not such a circumstance.
Yeah..to call you a dishonest pile of dung is to offend piles of dung everywhere.
Someone's going to dance with a needle in Terre Haute for killing a cop.A cop died (stroke) but not near her. Cops were injured and people should go to jail over that, but there's nothing that indicates the woman was involved in any of that. So, your false equivalency falls flat. And, while I'm willing to give you the benefit of the doubt and not cast you into irrelevancy, if your comment was an attempt by to slyly imply I'm racist, fuck you very much.
It wasn't to imply you're a racist. It was to imply that since you agreed with Babbitt's politics, you don't think the shooting was justified. If you owned a store and had an armed security guard and someone busted the window to come into the store...you'd be screaming for the guard to shoot the person coming through the window. You know it. I know it. You, in no way, would tell them, "Well, they don't mean you any harm". If you want to say something different, it will just further cement your status as being as delusional as you are dishonest. Fuck YOU very much.
So shooting unarmed people for trespass during a riot is justified, GOT IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You might want to inform BLM and ANTIFA of the rule change.
.
Damn, two replies to one post, are you getting that senile But if they break down my door, they'll have done more that just trespass. As far as anyone knows, Babbitt didn't break anything or threaten anyone with great bodily harm.
.
Perhaps your dumbest post to date ^
No small achievement!
The video title is a lie, I watched 3 times and listened very closely, she never uttered the word "storm". Why do you commie propagandist insist on lying?
.
That wasn’t when she used the word loon.
Did you enjoy seeing those “3 million” walking down PA Ave?
She didn't mention PA Ave either. But thanks for admitting the video title was a lie.
.
Indeed, lefties will have to exploit the meaning of armed insurrection if they want to push that narrative. Yet another example of what the opening post is about. Why does the left exaggerate so much?Armed doesn't exclusively mean armed with a firearm. It means armed (as in to carry) with a weapon and we saw in the video footage a variety of items that were used as weapons including the Capitol police's shields, flag pools, pepper/bear spray, etc.Lol, I heard it was an "armed" insurrection. Only problem though, is that there were not any guns found.Originally, I read that the cost was over 2 Billion dollars in damage and 6 people died. At least that's what the legacy media said. Then, they are silently walking that back. Facts show however: one person was killed. Ashli Babbitt. Killed by a nameless DC COP that shot through a door. And the actual cost, hard to find, but I found it was more like half a million. Why does the media and the Democrats continually exaggerate and focus on IT and ignore and downplay the cost monetarily and in lives of the ongoing damage done in the last year of race riots THEY supported?
Baseball bats, hockey sticks, crutches, nooses, gallows, crossbows, stun guns, bricks, rappelling gear, full body armor .. You know, the kind of stuff most tourists bring to the Capitol. Weapons? Meh!
Indeed, lefties will have to exploit the meaning of armed insurrection if they want to push that narrative. Yet another example of what the opening post is about. Why does the left exaggerate so much?Armed doesn't exclusively mean armed with a firearm. It means armed (as in to carry) with a weapon and we saw in the video footage a variety of items that were used as weapons including the Capitol police's shields, flag pools, pepper/bear spray, etc.Lol, I heard it was an "armed" insurrection. Only problem though, is that there were not any guns found.Originally, I read that the cost was over 2 Billion dollars in damage and 6 people died. At least that's what the legacy media said. Then, they are silently walking that back. Facts show however: one person was killed. Ashli Babbitt. Killed by a nameless DC COP that shot through a door. And the actual cost, hard to find, but I found it was more like half a million. Why does the media and the Democrats continually exaggerate and focus on IT and ignore and downplay the cost monetarily and in lives of the ongoing damage done in the last year of race riots THEY supported?
Baseball bats, hockey sticks, crutches, nooses, gallows, crossbows, stun guns, bricks, rappelling gear, full body armor .. You know, the kind of stuff most tourists bring to the Capitol. Weapons? Meh!
Indeed, lefties will have to exploit the meaning of armed insurrection if they want to push that narrative. Yet another example of what the opening post is about. Why does the left exaggerate so much?Armed doesn't exclusively mean armed with a firearm. It means armed (as in to carry) with a weapon and we saw in the video footage a variety of items that were used as weapons including the Capitol police's shields, flag pools, pepper/bear spray, etc.Lol, I heard it was an "armed" insurrection. Only problem though, is that there were not any guns found.Originally, I read that the cost was over 2 Billion dollars in damage and 6 people died. At least that's what the legacy media said. Then, they are silently walking that back. Facts show however: one person was killed. Ashli Babbitt. Killed by a nameless DC COP that shot through a door. And the actual cost, hard to find, but I found it was more like half a million. Why does the media and the Democrats continually exaggerate and focus on IT and ignore and downplay the cost monetarily and in lives of the ongoing damage done in the last year of race riots THEY supported?
Baseball bats, hockey sticks, crutches, nooses, gallows, crossbows, stun guns, bricks, rappelling gear, full body armor .. You know, the kind of stuff most tourists bring to the Capitol. Weapons? Meh!
It was a violent, armed insurrection. Cut it with the sugar coating!
Great... hope someone breaks down the front door to your house. I know you'll ask them to please not "trespass" and not think about doing them bodily harm.Oh bullshit. So should he have shot the next person through?Lets see, a cop was killed, 140 other cops were injured.The video of the insurrectionist getting shot shows her climbing through a window. You're lying. Again.Originally, I read that the cost was over 2 Billion dollars in damage and 6 people died. At least that's what the legacy media said. Then, they are silently walking that back. Facts show however: one person was killed. Ashli Babbitt. Killed by a nameless DC COP that shot through a door. And the actual cost, hard to find, but I found it was more like half a million. Why does the media and the Democrats continually exaggerate and focus on IT and ignore and downplay the cost monetarily and in lives of the ongoing damage done in the last year of race riots THEY supported?
She did not threaten anyone's life. Why was deadly force necessary?
Yes it was.
Lets go back in time....
View attachment 490367
Funny how you seem to change your position based on who was shot.
It's sad to see you turn into a dishonest pile of dung. First, it wasn't a case for "stand your ground" because it wasn't in a home and the policeman was not directly threatened by the woman.
During a riot.Second, even with "stand your ground", there has to be circumstances where a reasonable person would feel threatened. Breaking in a window in a public building in broad daylight is not such a circumstance.
Yeah..to call you a dishonest pile of dung is to offend piles of dung everywhere.
Someone's going to dance with a needle in Terre Haute for killing a cop.A cop died (stroke) but not near her. Cops were injured and people should go to jail over that, but there's nothing that indicates the woman was involved in any of that. So, your false equivalency falls flat. And, while I'm willing to give you the benefit of the doubt and not cast you into irrelevancy, if your comment was an attempt by to slyly imply I'm racist, fuck you very much.
It wasn't to imply you're a racist. It was to imply that since you agreed with Babbitt's politics, you don't think the shooting was justified. If you owned a store and had an armed security guard and someone busted the window to come into the store...you'd be screaming for the guard to shoot the person coming through the window. You know it. I know it. You, in no way, would tell them, "Well, they don't mean you any harm". If you want to say something different, it will just further cement your status as being as delusional as you are dishonest. Fuck YOU very much.
So shooting unarmed people for trespass during a riot is justified, GOT IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You might want to inform BLM and ANTIFA of the rule change.
.
Damn, two replies to one post, are you getting that senile But if they break down my door, they'll have done more that just trespass. As far as anyone knows, Babbitt didn't break anything or threaten anyone with great bodily harm.
.
Perhaps your dumbest post to date ^
No small achievement!
The video title is a lie, I watched 3 times and listened very closely, she never uttered the word "storm". Why do you commie propagandist insist on lying?
Who said she said "storm" in that video?
Read the title moron. Do you need to be spoon fed everything?
.
Moron, the word "storm" is not in quotes. The title references her saying how that mob of 3 million were marching to the Capitol.
Jenna Ryan concurs that it was peaceful, safe, and that none of these people had any bad intent
“We’re gonna go down there, break windows, and storm the Capitol!”
Congress does not work for thugsIts not about the money
It is about the assault on our nation
Occasionally congress needs a reminder who they work for. Routine elections paid for by big business don't seem to be getting the message across.
.
She was leading an angry mob trying to capture a CongressmanYou have seen the video of her climbing through the window of a barricaded door, right?Great... hope someone breaks down the front door to your house. I know you'll ask them to please not "trespass" and not think about doing them bodily harm.Oh bullshit. So should he have shot the next person through?Lets see, a cop was killed, 140 other cops were injured.The video of the insurrectionist getting shot shows her climbing through a window. You're lying. Again.Originally, I read that the cost was over 2 Billion dollars in damage and 6 people died. At least that's what the legacy media said. Then, they are silently walking that back. Facts show however: one person was killed. Ashli Babbitt. Killed by a nameless DC COP that shot through a door. And the actual cost, hard to find, but I found it was more like half a million. Why does the media and the Democrats continually exaggerate and focus on IT and ignore and downplay the cost monetarily and in lives of the ongoing damage done in the last year of race riots THEY supported?
She did not threaten anyone's life. Why was deadly force necessary?
Yes it was.
Lets go back in time....
View attachment 490367
Funny how you seem to change your position based on who was shot.
It's sad to see you turn into a dishonest pile of dung. First, it wasn't a case for "stand your ground" because it wasn't in a home and the policeman was not directly threatened by the woman.
During a riot.Second, even with "stand your ground", there has to be circumstances where a reasonable person would feel threatened. Breaking in a window in a public building in broad daylight is not such a circumstance.
Yeah..to call you a dishonest pile of dung is to offend piles of dung everywhere.
Someone's going to dance with a needle in Terre Haute for killing a cop.A cop died (stroke) but not near her. Cops were injured and people should go to jail over that, but there's nothing that indicates the woman was involved in any of that. So, your false equivalency falls flat. And, while I'm willing to give you the benefit of the doubt and not cast you into irrelevancy, if your comment was an attempt by to slyly imply I'm racist, fuck you very much.
It wasn't to imply you're a racist. It was to imply that since you agreed with Babbitt's politics, you don't think the shooting was justified. If you owned a store and had an armed security guard and someone busted the window to come into the store...you'd be screaming for the guard to shoot the person coming through the window. You know it. I know it. You, in no way, would tell them, "Well, they don't mean you any harm". If you want to say something different, it will just further cement your status as being as delusional as you are dishonest. Fuck YOU very much.
So shooting unarmed people for trespass during a riot is justified, GOT IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You might want to inform BLM and ANTIFA of the rule change.
.
Damn, two replies to one post, are you getting that senile But if they break down my door, they'll have done more that just trespass. As far as anyone knows, Babbitt didn't break anything or threaten anyone with great bodily harm.
.
Did she break the window, or display a weapon?
.
Cost her life
See post #223.See post 216.She was leading an angry mob trying to capture a CongressmanYou have seen the video of her climbing through the window of a barricaded door, right?Great... hope someone breaks down the front door to your house. I know you'll ask them to please not "trespass" and not think about doing them bodily harm.Oh bullshit. So should he have shot the next person through?Lets see, a cop was killed, 140 other cops were injured.The video of the insurrectionist getting shot shows her climbing through a window. You're lying. Again.Originally, I read that the cost was over 2 Billion dollars in damage and 6 people died. At least that's what the legacy media said. Then, they are silently walking that back. Facts show however: one person was killed. Ashli Babbitt. Killed by a nameless DC COP that shot through a door. And the actual cost, hard to find, but I found it was more like half a million. Why does the media and the Democrats continually exaggerate and focus on IT and ignore and downplay the cost monetarily and in lives of the ongoing damage done in the last year of race riots THEY supported?
She did not threaten anyone's life. Why was deadly force necessary?
Yes it was.
Lets go back in time....
View attachment 490367
Funny how you seem to change your position based on who was shot.
It's sad to see you turn into a dishonest pile of dung. First, it wasn't a case for "stand your ground" because it wasn't in a home and the policeman was not directly threatened by the woman.
During a riot.Second, even with "stand your ground", there has to be circumstances where a reasonable person would feel threatened. Breaking in a window in a public building in broad daylight is not such a circumstance.
Yeah..to call you a dishonest pile of dung is to offend piles of dung everywhere.
Someone's going to dance with a needle in Terre Haute for killing a cop.A cop died (stroke) but not near her. Cops were injured and people should go to jail over that, but there's nothing that indicates the woman was involved in any of that. So, your false equivalency falls flat. And, while I'm willing to give you the benefit of the doubt and not cast you into irrelevancy, if your comment was an attempt by to slyly imply I'm racist, fuck you very much.
It wasn't to imply you're a racist. It was to imply that since you agreed with Babbitt's politics, you don't think the shooting was justified. If you owned a store and had an armed security guard and someone busted the window to come into the store...you'd be screaming for the guard to shoot the person coming through the window. You know it. I know it. You, in no way, would tell them, "Well, they don't mean you any harm". If you want to say something different, it will just further cement your status as being as delusional as you are dishonest. Fuck YOU very much.
So shooting unarmed people for trespass during a riot is justified, GOT IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You might want to inform BLM and ANTIFA of the rule change.
.
Damn, two replies to one post, are you getting that senile But if they break down my door, they'll have done more that just trespass. As far as anyone knows, Babbitt didn't break anything or threaten anyone with great bodily harm.
.
Did she break the window, or display a weapon?
.
Cost her life
It's a form of lying, a key tool in the left's propaganda.Why does the left exaggerate so much?
You prove again to be an idiot to think her size matters. It was the mob that mattered. She just happened to be the one leading the charge towards the House chamber with members of Congress holed up.No, she tried to lead a violent mob past a police barricade and into a restricted area where lawmakers were hiding from them.You have seen the video of her climbing through the window of a barricaded door, right?Great... hope someone breaks down the front door to your house. I know you'll ask them to please not "trespass" and not think about doing them bodily harm.Oh bullshit. So should he have shot the next person through?Lets see, a cop was killed, 140 other cops were injured.The video of the insurrectionist getting shot shows her climbing through a window. You're lying. Again.Originally, I read that the cost was over 2 Billion dollars in damage and 6 people died. At least that's what the legacy media said. Then, they are silently walking that back. Facts show however: one person was killed. Ashli Babbitt. Killed by a nameless DC COP that shot through a door. And the actual cost, hard to find, but I found it was more like half a million. Why does the media and the Democrats continually exaggerate and focus on IT and ignore and downplay the cost monetarily and in lives of the ongoing damage done in the last year of race riots THEY supported?
She did not threaten anyone's life. Why was deadly force necessary?
Yes it was.
Lets go back in time....
View attachment 490367
Funny how you seem to change your position based on who was shot.
It's sad to see you turn into a dishonest pile of dung. First, it wasn't a case for "stand your ground" because it wasn't in a home and the policeman was not directly threatened by the woman.
During a riot.Second, even with "stand your ground", there has to be circumstances where a reasonable person would feel threatened. Breaking in a window in a public building in broad daylight is not such a circumstance.
Yeah..to call you a dishonest pile of dung is to offend piles of dung everywhere.
Someone's going to dance with a needle in Terre Haute for killing a cop.A cop died (stroke) but not near her. Cops were injured and people should go to jail over that, but there's nothing that indicates the woman was involved in any of that. So, your false equivalency falls flat. And, while I'm willing to give you the benefit of the doubt and not cast you into irrelevancy, if your comment was an attempt by to slyly imply I'm racist, fuck you very much.
It wasn't to imply you're a racist. It was to imply that since you agreed with Babbitt's politics, you don't think the shooting was justified. If you owned a store and had an armed security guard and someone busted the window to come into the store...you'd be screaming for the guard to shoot the person coming through the window. You know it. I know it. You, in no way, would tell them, "Well, they don't mean you any harm". If you want to say something different, it will just further cement your status as being as delusional as you are dishonest. Fuck YOU very much.
So shooting unarmed people for trespass during a riot is justified, GOT IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You might want to inform BLM and ANTIFA of the rule change.
.
Damn, two replies to one post, are you getting that senile But if they break down my door, they'll have done more that just trespass. As far as anyone knows, Babbitt didn't break anything or threaten anyone with great bodily harm.
.
Did she break the window, or display a weapon?
Yeah, I can see how some affirmative action hire, BLM supporter, cop would find an unarmed 5'2" petite blond a serious threat. Such an imposing sight that must have been.
.
Indeed, lefties will have to exploit the meaning of armed insurrection if they want to push that narrative. Yet another example of what the opening post is about. Why does the left exaggerate so much?Armed doesn't exclusively mean armed with a firearm. It means armed (as in to carry) with a weapon and we saw in the video footage a variety of items that were used as weapons including the Capitol police's shields, flag pools, pepper/bear spray, etc.Lol, I heard it was an "armed" insurrection. Only problem though, is that there were not any guns found.Originally, I read that the cost was over 2 Billion dollars in damage and 6 people died. At least that's what the legacy media said. Then, they are silently walking that back. Facts show however: one person was killed. Ashli Babbitt. Killed by a nameless DC COP that shot through a door. And the actual cost, hard to find, but I found it was more like half a million. Why does the media and the Democrats continually exaggerate and focus on IT and ignore and downplay the cost monetarily and in lives of the ongoing damage done in the last year of race riots THEY supported?
Baseball bats, hockey sticks, crutches, nooses, gallows, crossbows, stun guns, bricks, rappelling gear, full body armor .. You know, the kind of stuff most tourists bring to the Capitol. Weapons? Meh!
It was a violent, armed insurrection. Cut it with the sugar coating!
ndeed, lefties will have to exploit the meaning of armed insurrection if they want to push that narrative. Yet another example of what the opening post is about. Why does the left exaggerate so much?
Liar, there were no insurgents in the House chamber. Lawmakers were in there waiting to be escorted out to safety.You prove again to be an idiot to think her size matters. It was the mob that mattered. She just happened to be the one leading the charge towards the House chamber with members of Congress holed up.No, she tried to lead a violent mob past a police barricade and into a restricted area where lawmakers were hiding from them.You have seen the video of her climbing through the window of a barricaded door, right?Great... hope someone breaks down the front door to your house. I know you'll ask them to please not "trespass" and not think about doing them bodily harm.Oh bullshit. So should he have shot the next person through?Lets see, a cop was killed, 140 other cops were injured.The video of the insurrectionist getting shot shows her climbing through a window. You're lying. Again.Originally, I read that the cost was over 2 Billion dollars in damage and 6 people died. At least that's what the legacy media said. Then, they are silently walking that back. Facts show however: one person was killed. Ashli Babbitt. Killed by a nameless DC COP that shot through a door. And the actual cost, hard to find, but I found it was more like half a million. Why does the media and the Democrats continually exaggerate and focus on IT and ignore and downplay the cost monetarily and in lives of the ongoing damage done in the last year of race riots THEY supported?
She did not threaten anyone's life. Why was deadly force necessary?
Yes it was.
Lets go back in time....
View attachment 490367
Funny how you seem to change your position based on who was shot.
It's sad to see you turn into a dishonest pile of dung. First, it wasn't a case for "stand your ground" because it wasn't in a home and the policeman was not directly threatened by the woman.
During a riot.Second, even with "stand your ground", there has to be circumstances where a reasonable person would feel threatened. Breaking in a window in a public building in broad daylight is not such a circumstance.
Yeah..to call you a dishonest pile of dung is to offend piles of dung everywhere.
Someone's going to dance with a needle in Terre Haute for killing a cop.A cop died (stroke) but not near her. Cops were injured and people should go to jail over that, but there's nothing that indicates the woman was involved in any of that. So, your false equivalency falls flat. And, while I'm willing to give you the benefit of the doubt and not cast you into irrelevancy, if your comment was an attempt by to slyly imply I'm racist, fuck you very much.
It wasn't to imply you're a racist. It was to imply that since you agreed with Babbitt's politics, you don't think the shooting was justified. If you owned a store and had an armed security guard and someone busted the window to come into the store...you'd be screaming for the guard to shoot the person coming through the window. You know it. I know it. You, in no way, would tell them, "Well, they don't mean you any harm". If you want to say something different, it will just further cement your status as being as delusional as you are dishonest. Fuck YOU very much.
So shooting unarmed people for trespass during a riot is justified, GOT IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You might want to inform BLM and ANTIFA of the rule change.
.
Damn, two replies to one post, are you getting that senile But if they break down my door, they'll have done more that just trespass. As far as anyone knows, Babbitt didn't break anything or threaten anyone with great bodily harm.
.
Did she break the window, or display a weapon?
Yeah, I can see how some affirmative action hire, BLM supporter, cop would find an unarmed 5'2" petite blond a serious threat. Such an imposing sight that must have been.
.
Oh bullshit, there were already people in the house chamber, she wasn't leading a damn thing.
.
Great... hope someone breaks down the front door to your house. I know you'll ask them to please not "trespass" and not think about doing them bodily harm.Oh bullshit. So should he have shot the next person through?Lets see, a cop was killed, 140 other cops were injured.The video of the insurrectionist getting shot shows her climbing through a window. You're lying. Again.Originally, I read that the cost was over 2 Billion dollars in damage and 6 people died. At least that's what the legacy media said. Then, they are silently walking that back. Facts show however: one person was killed. Ashli Babbitt. Killed by a nameless DC COP that shot through a door. And the actual cost, hard to find, but I found it was more like half a million. Why does the media and the Democrats continually exaggerate and focus on IT and ignore and downplay the cost monetarily and in lives of the ongoing damage done in the last year of race riots THEY supported?
She did not threaten anyone's life. Why was deadly force necessary?
Yes it was.
Lets go back in time....
View attachment 490367
Funny how you seem to change your position based on who was shot.
It's sad to see you turn into a dishonest pile of dung. First, it wasn't a case for "stand your ground" because it wasn't in a home and the policeman was not directly threatened by the woman.
During a riot.Second, even with "stand your ground", there has to be circumstances where a reasonable person would feel threatened. Breaking in a window in a public building in broad daylight is not such a circumstance.
Yeah..to call you a dishonest pile of dung is to offend piles of dung everywhere.
Someone's going to dance with a needle in Terre Haute for killing a cop.A cop died (stroke) but not near her. Cops were injured and people should go to jail over that, but there's nothing that indicates the woman was involved in any of that. So, your false equivalency falls flat. And, while I'm willing to give you the benefit of the doubt and not cast you into irrelevancy, if your comment was an attempt by to slyly imply I'm racist, fuck you very much.
It wasn't to imply you're a racist. It was to imply that since you agreed with Babbitt's politics, you don't think the shooting was justified. If you owned a store and had an armed security guard and someone busted the window to come into the store...you'd be screaming for the guard to shoot the person coming through the window. You know it. I know it. You, in no way, would tell them, "Well, they don't mean you any harm". If you want to say something different, it will just further cement your status as being as delusional as you are dishonest. Fuck YOU very much.
So shooting unarmed people for trespass during a riot is justified, GOT IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You might want to inform BLM and ANTIFA of the rule change.
.
Damn, two replies to one post, are you getting that senile But if they break down my door, they'll have done more that just trespass. As far as anyone knows, Babbitt didn't break anything or threaten anyone with great bodily harm.
.
Perhaps your dumbest post to date ^
No small achievement!
The video title is a lie, I watched 3 times and listened very closely, she never uttered the word "storm". Why do you commie propagandist insist on lying?
Who said she said "storm" in that video?
Read the title moron. Do you need to be spoon fed everything?
.
Moron, the word "storm" is not in quotes. The title references her saying how that mob of 3 million were marching to the Capitol.
