Alis volat propriis
- Aug 25, 2009
- Reaction score
You have seen the video of her climbing through the window of a barricaded door, right?Great... hope someone breaks down the front door to your house. I know you'll ask them to please not "trespass" and not think about doing them bodily harm.Oh bullshit. So should he have shot the next person through?Lets see, a cop was killed, 140 other cops were injured.The video of the insurrectionist getting shot shows her climbing through a window. You're lying. Again.Originally, I read that the cost was over 2 Billion dollars in damage and 6 people died. At least that's what the legacy media said. Then, they are silently walking that back. Facts show however: one person was killed. Ashli Babbitt. Killed by a nameless DC COP that shot through a door. And the actual cost, hard to find, but I found it was more like half a million. Why does the media and the Democrats continually exaggerate and focus on IT and ignore and downplay the cost monetarily and in lives of the ongoing damage done in the last year of race riots THEY supported?
She did not threaten anyone's life. Why was deadly force necessary?
Yes it was.
Lets go back in time....
View attachment 490367
Funny how you seem to change your position based on who was shot.
It's sad to see you turn into a dishonest pile of dung. First, it wasn't a case for "stand your ground" because it wasn't in a home and the policeman was not directly threatened by the woman.
During a riot.Second, even with "stand your ground", there has to be circumstances where a reasonable person would feel threatened. Breaking in a window in a public building in broad daylight is not such a circumstance.
Yeah..to call you a dishonest pile of dung is to offend piles of dung everywhere.
Someone's going to dance with a needle in Terre Haute for killing a cop.A cop died (stroke) but not near her. Cops were injured and people should go to jail over that, but there's nothing that indicates the woman was involved in any of that. So, your false equivalency falls flat. And, while I'm willing to give you the benefit of the doubt and not cast you into irrelevancy, if your comment was an attempt by to slyly imply I'm racist, fuck you very much.
It wasn't to imply you're a racist. It was to imply that since you agreed with Babbitt's politics, you don't think the shooting was justified. If you owned a store and had an armed security guard and someone busted the window to come into the store...you'd be screaming for the guard to shoot the person coming through the window. You know it. I know it. You, in no way, would tell them, "Well, they don't mean you any harm". If you want to say something different, it will just further cement your status as being as delusional as you are dishonest. Fuck YOU very much.
So shooting unarmed people for trespass during a riot is justified, GOT IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You might want to inform BLM and ANTIFA of the rule change.
Damn, two replies to one post, are you getting that senile But if they break down my door, they'll have done more that just trespass. As far as anyone knows, Babbitt didn't break anything or threaten anyone with great bodily harm.