Democrat leading Michigan Senate primary defended terrorist Muslim Brotherhood power grab in Egypt

Dont Taz Me Bro

Diamond Member
Staff member
Senior USMB Moderator
Moderator
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2009
Messages
78,025
Reaction score
48,901
Points
2,645
Location
Las Vegas, Nevada
The Democrats' leading Senate candidate in Michigan is a terrorist supporter. Their candidate in Maine is a womanizing Nazi and one of their House candidates in New Jersey has past Al-Qaeda affiliations. They aren't sending their best, nonetheless, given Trump's low approval rating and poor economic conditions, all three of them could win. The Democrats are slowly normalising anti-Semitism in their wings.

 
The Democrats' leading Senate candidate in Michigan is a terrorist supporter. Their candidate in Maine is a womanizing Nazi and one of their House candidates in New Jersey has past Al-Qaeda affiliations. They aren't sending their best, nonetheless, given Trump's low approval rating and poor economic conditions, all three of them could win. The Democrats are slowly normalising anti-Semitism in their wings.

Not sure how you can reconcile the fact that the democrats have put up lowlifes
and blame it on Trump. :rolleyes-41:
Perhaps they are now the face of the democrat party.
 
So, what you're saying is he was on the US/Israel payroll at one time in his life?
 
Excuse me, has everyone not noticed that most dumocraps already in congress are complete trainwrecks? Come on, you have The Squad in congress. Somehow Jasmine Crockett got into the system for awhile. Then there is the Harris, the mother of all WTF? candidates, who was chosen to be POTUS in 2024 and may end up being the chosen one for 2028. Maybe even 2032 and 2036 as well. They have been scraping the bottom of the barrel for a very long time. Platner and the new crop are the same as the last crop. Absolutely worthless.
 
"They aren't sending their best, nonetheless, given Trump's low approval rating and poor economic conditions, all three of them could win"

Correct. And?
 
The Democrats' leading Senate candidate in Michigan is a terrorist supporter. Their candidate in Maine is a womanizing Nazi and one of their House candidates in New Jersey has past Al-Qaeda affiliations. They aren't sending their best, nonetheless, given Trump's low approval rating and poor economic conditions, all three of them could win. The Democrats are slowly normalising anti-Semitism in their wings.


I've check several legitimate (meaning NOT Conservative Propaganda sites and you story is bogus. Did not happen, an out right, down right lie. You should be ashamed for posting it.
 
I've check several legitimate (meaning NOT Conservative Propaganda sites and you story is bogus. Did not happen, an out right, down right lie. You should be ashamed for posting it.
Says the person posting unverified stories of Trump funding orgies.🤡
 
The Democrats' leading Senate candidate in Michigan is a terrorist supporter. Their candidate in Maine is a womanizing Nazi and one of their House candidates in New Jersey has past Al-Qaeda affiliations. They aren't sending their best, nonetheless, given Trump's low approval rating and poor economic conditions, all three of them could win. The Democrats are slowly normalising anti-Semitism in their wings.

The economic conditions aren't as bad as the anti-Trump media are trying to portray them. Yes, there is an affordability crisis but the biggest part of that is the four year inflation rate total of 20% under democrats, which is cooked into the books and can't be removed. Tariffs didn't really increase prices much at all, with most companies eating the majority of the tariffs. Yes, the Iran war has contributued to inflation but even that is only 4% comparied to the 3% inflation had been at. Headlines claim that inflation is "surging" but a 1% increase isn't really surging and if the war does end and the Strait is opened back up, even that will go back down. As I said, the biggest problem is the 20% inflation we had under democrats and it's still making things unaffordable to this day. And, much of the unaffordability is in the blue states and the blue cities.
 
Last edited:
The economic conditions aren't as bad as the anti-Trump media are trying to portray them. Yes, there is an affordability crisis but the biggest part of that is the four year inflation rate total of 20% under democrats, which is cooked into the books and can't be removed. Tariffs didn't really increase prices much at all, with most companies eating the majority of the tariffs. Yes, the Iran war has contributued to inflation but even that is only 4% comparied to the 3% inflation had been at. Headlines claim that inflation is "surging" but a 1% increase isn't really surging and if the war does end and the Strait is opened back up, even that will go back down. As I said, the biggest problem is the 20% inflation we had under democrats and it's still making things unaffordable to this day.
We all know that, but the dumocraps need ANYTHING to make Trump look bad and hope that it somehow makes them look better. What they don't want to admit is that even when Trump does something that affects his popularity it has no bearing on how abysmally unpopular the dumocrap party is. No matter what happens under Trump, it will never be even close to as bad as what happened under Biden. That Biden Shadow is still following the dumocraps around and they either won't notice it or just don't have any way to make it go away.
 
They aren't sending their best, nonetheless, given Trump's low approval rating and poor economic conditions, all three of them could win.
For the most part -- I've seen maybe a handful of exceptions -- the Dems haven't learned anything.

When the best thing both parties have going for them is the other party, the country is in serious trouble.
 
I've check several legitimate (meaning NOT Conservative Propaganda sites and you story is bogus. Did not happen, an out right, down right lie. You should be ashamed for posting it.
Dr. Abdul El-Sayed, a top contender to be the Democratic Party nominee for the U.S. Senate in Michigan, has a history of downplaying the threat posed by the Muslim Brotherhood — now designated a terrorist group by the U.S. — and even defended a brazen power grab by the Islamist group’s leader during the Brotherhood’s brief reign in Egypt.

El-Sayed, who is seeking to be the first Muslim in the U.S. Senate, signed onto a 2012 statement which defended the Muslim Brotherhood’s rule of Egypt and further defended a massive power grab by Mohammed Morsi, the leader of Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood. The statement purportedly signed by El-Sayed and published in an Egyptian newspaper, contended that the “revolutionary decisions, which we have long called for but which the president [Morsi] has delayed for reasons unknown to us, were necessary."

The Muslim Brotherhood — a radical Islamist group which had spent decades trying to overthrow Egypt’s military government — briefly came to power in Egypt in the wake of the Arab Spring. The Muslim Brotherhood-backed January 2011 Egyptian Revolution — notable for massive protests in Cairo’s Tahrir Square — resulted in the February 2011 resignation of longtime Egyptian president and military strongman Hosni Mubarak.
 
15th post
I've check several legitimate (meaning NOT Conservative Propaganda sites and you story is bogus. Did not happen, an out right, down right lie. You should be ashamed for posting it.

Translation - "I only believe the news that tells me what I want to hear."

Unfortunately for you, the article is sourced.

The attacking the source fallacy occurs when someone dismisses an argument solely based on who made it, rather than addressing the argument’s actual merits.

Definition​

The attacking the source fallacy, also known as ad hominem, involves rejecting or undermining a claim by targeting the person or source rather than the argument itself springhole.net+2. This fallacy diverts attention from the substance of the argument and focuses on irrelevant personal traits, motives, or affiliations of the individual making the claim Effectiviology. It assumes that flaws in the person automatically invalidate their argument, which is logically unsound.

Common Forms​

  1. Personal Character Attacks: Criticizing someone’s character, habits, or background instead of engaging with their argument. For example, dismissing a tax policy proposal by saying, “You’re overweight, so your opinion on economics doesn’t count” logicallyfallacious.com.
  2. Source-Based Dismissal: Rejecting information because of its origin, such as claiming, “You read it on Wikipedia, so it must be false,” without evaluating the content itself springhole.net.
You're low human capital
 
Translation - "I only believe the news that tells me what I want to hear."

Unfortunately for you, the article is sourced.

The attacking the source fallacy occurs when someone dismisses an argument solely based on who made it, rather than addressing the argument’s actual merits.

Definition​

The attacking the source fallacy, also known as ad hominem, involves rejecting or undermining a claim by targeting the person or source rather than the argument itself springhole.net+2. This fallacy diverts attention from the substance of the argument and focuses on irrelevant personal traits, motives, or affiliations of the individual making the claim Effectiviology. It assumes that flaws in the person automatically invalidate their argument, which is logically unsound.

Common Forms​

  1. Personal Character Attacks: Criticizing someone’s character, habits, or background instead of engaging with their argument. For example, dismissing a tax policy proposal by saying, “You’re overweight, so your opinion on economics doesn’t count” logicallyfallacious.com.
  2. Source-Based Dismissal: Rejecting information because of its origin, such as claiming, “You read it on Wikipedia, so it must be false,” without evaluating the content itself springhole.net.
You're low human capital

NO. I only believe legitimate news sources, NOT Reich Wing Wing Conspiracy Nut Jobs Sites. I only believe in the truth, NOT Reich Wing Propaganda. As stated before, I went legitimate news sources( Associated Press,, UPI, and the BBC). You posted a lie, you posted a lie and and did NOT care if you posted a lie. Your source is highly questionable and you do not like being called out for that.
 
Last edited:
The Democrats' leading Senate candidate in Michigan is a terrorist supporter. Their candidate in Maine is a womanizing Nazi and one of their House candidates in New Jersey has past Al-Qaeda affiliations. They aren't sending their best, nonetheless, given Trump's low approval rating and poor economic conditions, all three of them could win. The Democrats are slowly normalising anti-Semitism in their wings.


More smears. They won't work anymore. No one is interested in right wing fake news.
 
More smears. They won't work anymore. No one is interested in right wing fake news.
Translation - I only believe the news I want to hear fed to me by my tribe because I’m low human capital.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom