"It's not theirs, Its mine"

[OKTexas]

"Normal" Americans like yourself do not know or care what the Laws are. Nobody needs to think seriously about an issue. Just do it !

Garland had to ponder what to do with Trump's refusal to return documents and items Twice asked for in a subpoena . Was he given enough time to return them.

Actually, if Garland had done so Immediately, all the Trump followers would be saying the opposite, accusing him of being too hasty, because The Opposite of what is said about him is what all of you have been trained to do in the past seven years.
Never mind Laws, Common Sense, History or anything else which has, so far, been the barometer of what is factual and what is not.


Trump says something. APPLAUSE !!

Republicans, Democrats, Independents say something which could harm Trump. Attack, delegitimize, threaten, show your guns, threaten a civil war.

Trump has created doubt about everything since he came down that escalator, already sowing doubt of election being rigged during campaign in 2016 if he did not win the Presidency.

But here you all are. Believe anything which comes out of his tweets, or mouth, or social media.


The Truth of the Universe According to Trump.

How so many were so fooled in such a short time by so few. First Trump and then the Republican congress members who saw no other way to power but to follow his endless attempts to destroy the constitution and the rule of law.


LAUGH CLOWNS, LAUGH. !!!!!!

I want you to think with your own brain, and not with Trump's brain.


Can you do it? Any of you?

Actually, it's the FBI and DOJ that have destroyed their own credibility by not enforcing the law evenly.

.

 

[OKTexas]

It is called following the rule of law. There are laws in the US, and all are subject to them, no matter what the party.

The point may be that you are not aware of what the issues are which brought an investigation on Trump about his dealing with banks, way before he campaigned for President. No political motives there.

There is no political motive to go after Tax Fraud, as his accountant was just sentenced for it for what he did for the Trump Organization BEFORE Trump started campaigning for President in 2016.

So, your calls of Witch Hunt is nothing more than parroting what Trump tells his followers, as most do not know, or could not care, about how he has always run his businesses.


Is Trump honest Abe?

He has to go through the process of proving it like any one else.

But how amazing that he pleaded the fifth about 440 times when he deposed for the NY State about his case there. Can it be that he actually does not know anything on how his Organization runs? He has no knowledge of anything? He is not in charge of anything?

He did not simply not say I do not know about this subject, someone who worked for me can answer it.
He Pleaded the FIFTH, which means his answers could incriminate him.

"The grilling included questions about the valuations of various Trump Organization properties and golf clubs, mortgages, loans and the size of Trump’s apartment, said Ron Fischetti, a lawyer for Trump."

Trump took the Fifth Amendment at least 440 times in deposition with NYS attorney general Letitia James: report

That’s a whole lot of self-incrimination. Former President Donald Trump pleaded the Fifth Amendment at least 440 times on Wednesday to avoid answering questions in his four-hour deposition wi…

www.nydailynews.com

THINK. !!!!!! PLEASE THINK, do no simply follow.

Again, what would you do if you were being deposed by a bitch that campaigned on indicting you? She doesn't have her thumb on the scale of justice, the fat bitch is standing on it. She would have been disbarred in any other State.

.

 

[Meathead]

What do you think of the reports, trump was ratted out again by somebody close enough to him to know what was in the boxes not returned, when first demanded?

Not much. Back to the media of today.

 

[OKTexas]

Thank you for not caring about the law. And you did not care while Trump was President, either, because you have no knowledge of what the law is or says.

And you did not know it under Reagan? Or the 2 Bush Presidents? Those cared about the law and knew what the law was about.

Trump says "What Law will you follow? ", and you say "YOURS, Trump, yours"

You GD commies didn't care about the law when Comey laid out a prima facie case against the bitch for violations of the Espionage Act, or when he testified in congress that the bitch lied to congress at least 5 times. So just run along, commie hypocrite.

.

 

[struth]

Biden is in charge of classified information, because he was elected by the people of the country.

If the people wanted Trump to have access, they would have re-elected him.

Trump was elected by the people, and was in charge before...that's what we keep trying to tell you. That's why there was no classified material, and the raid was all political based.

 

[OKTexas]

Biden is in charge of classified information, because he was elected by the people of the country.

If the people wanted Trump to have access, they would have re-elected him.

xiden is too senile to be in charge of anything, hell he has trouble putting on his own coat and shakes hands with thin air.

.

 

[Marener]

You GD commies didn't care about the law when Comey laid out a prima facie case against the bitch for violations of the Espionage Act, or when he testified in congress that the bitch lied to congress at least 5 times. So just run along, commie hypocrite.

.

The evidence against Clinton was always weak and circumstantial and it was not a case that was likely to result in conviction.

 None of the emails contained clear classification markings as required under Executive Order 13526 and its predecessor. Only three email chains contained any classification markings of any kind. These email chains had one or two paragraphs that were marked “(C)” for “Confidential” but contained none of the other required markings, such as classification headers.
 There was no evidence that the senders or former Secretary Clinton believed or were aware at the time that the emails contained classified information. In the absence of clear classification markings, the prosecutors determined that it would be difficult to dispute the sincerity of these witnesses’ stated beliefs that the material was not classified.
 The senders and former Secretary Clinton relied on the judgment of employees experienced in protecting sensitive information to properly handle classified information.
 The emails in question were sent to other government officials in furtherance of the senders’ official duties. There was no evidence that the senders or former Secretary Clinton intended that classified information be sent to unauthorized recipients, or that they intentionally sought to store classified information on unauthorized systems.
 There was no evidence that former Secretary Clinton had any contemporaneous concerns about the classified status of the information that was conveyed on her unclassified systems, nor any evidence that any individual ever contemporaneously conveyed such concerns to her.
 Although some witnesses expressed concern or surprise when they saw some of the classified content in unclassified emails, the prosecutors concluded that the investigation did not reveal evidence that any U.S. government employees involved in the SAP willfully communicated the information to a person not entitled to receive it, or willfully retained the same.
 The senders used unclassified emails because of “operational tempo,” that is, the need to get information quickly to senior State Department officials at times when the recipients lacked access to classified systems. To accomplish this, senders often refrained from using specific classified facts or terms in emails and worded emails carefully in an attempt to avoid transmitting classified information.
 There was no evidence that Clinton set up her servers or private email account with the intent of communicating or retaining classified information, or that she had knowledge that classified information would be communicated or retained on it.

 

[Marener]

Trump was elected by the people, and was in charge before...that's what we keep trying to tell you. That's why there was no classified material, and the raid was all political based.

This whole scandal relates to what happened after he was in office. Not during.

He is a citizen now. Not president. He does not have any authority anymore.

 

[Marener]

xiden is too senile to be in charge of anything, hell he has trouble putting on his own coat and shakes hands with thin air.

.

Okay then. I guess he isn’t president because you say so.

 

[OKTexas]

The evidence against Clinton was always weak and circumstantial and it was not a case that was likely to result in conviction.

 None of the emails contained clear classification markings as required under Executive Order 13526 and its predecessor. Only three email chains contained any classification markings of any kind. These email chains had one or two paragraphs that were marked “(C)” for “Confidential” but contained none of the other required markings, such as classification headers.
 There was no evidence that the senders or former Secretary Clinton believed or were aware at the time that the emails contained classified information. In the absence of clear classification markings, the prosecutors determined that it would be difficult to dispute the sincerity of these witnesses’ stated beliefs that the material was not classified.
 The senders and former Secretary Clinton relied on the judgment of employees experienced in protecting sensitive information to properly handle classified information.
 The emails in question were sent to other government officials in furtherance of the senders’ official duties. There was no evidence that the senders or former Secretary Clinton intended that classified information be sent to unauthorized recipients, or that they intentionally sought to store classified information on unauthorized systems.
 There was no evidence that former Secretary Clinton had any contemporaneous concerns about the classified status of the information that was conveyed on her unclassified systems, nor any evidence that any individual ever contemporaneously conveyed such concerns to her.
 Although some witnesses expressed concern or surprise when they saw some of the classified content in unclassified emails, the prosecutors concluded that the investigation did not reveal evidence that any U.S. government employees involved in the SAP willfully communicated the information to a person not entitled to receive it, or willfully retained the same.
 The senders used unclassified emails because of “operational tempo,” that is, the need to get information quickly to senior State Department officials at times when the recipients lacked access to classified systems. To accomplish this, senders often refrained from using specific classified facts or terms in emails and worded emails carefully in an attempt to avoid transmitting classified information.
 There was no evidence that Clinton set up her servers or private email account with the intent of communicating or retaining classified information, or that she had knowledge that classified information would be communicated or retained on it.

That's funny as hell, the bitch told a staffer to remove classified marking and send a document unsecure. You can give all the excuses DOJ invented not to prosecute, but that one documented instance demonstrated clear intent and probably the culture she created as SOS.

.

 

[OKTexas]

Okay then. I guess he isn’t president because you say so.

Ugh, where did I say that? Having the title and being in charge are not the same.

.

 

[Marener]

That's funny as hell, the bitch told a staffer to remove classified marking and send a document unsecure. You can give all the excuses DOJ invented not to prosecute, but that one documented instance demonstrated clear intent and probably the culture she created as SOS.

.

There’s not even evidence that fax was actually sent and it’s less than clear that she simply asked to remove classified markings vs removing classified material.

You are the one making things up.

 

[Marener]

Ugh, where did I say that? Having the title and being in charge are not the same.

.

If you say so. I guess you’re the expert on the inner workings of the Biden administration then. A real insider here.

 

[OKTexas]

There’s not even evidence that fax was actually sent and it’s less than clear that she simply asked to remove classified markings vs removing classified material.

You are the one making things up.

Exactly what did you fail to understand about "INTENT"????????????????? Now prove the bitch didn't give the same instructions on the other classified info on her server and the staff simply missed a couple of minor markings.

.

 

[easyt65]

If you say so. I guess you’re the expert on the inner workings of the Biden administration then. A real insider here.

Biden is given cue cards telling him when to walk, when to sit, when to leave...and you think HE is in charge. Bwuhahahaha That's cute...

 

[Marener]

Exactly what did you fail to understand about "INTENT"????????????????? Now prove the bitch didn't give the same instructions on the other classified info on her server and the staff simply missed a couple of minor markings.

.

Intent to do what exactly? You’re not being accurate about what was said, nor does it bear relation to the email issue.

I don’t have to prove shit because it’s up to the criminal justice system to prove their case.

What you’re saying doesn’t even make sense since we aren’t talking about classified documents like one would receive in briefings, these are email discussions of high level state dept employees that mention classified documents. It doesn’t make sense to accuse her of stripping headers that clearly never existed in the first place.

 

[Marener]

Biden is given cue cards telling him when to walk, when to sit, when to leave...and you think HE is in charge. Bwuhahahaha That's cute...

I suppose you think Trump was in charge?

 

[struth]

This whole scandal relates to what happened after he was in office. Not during.

He is a citizen now. Not president. He does not have any authority anymore.

i agee the daca deal is the raid and weapizing of the doj by the demafasict

 

[Marener]

i agee the daca deal is the raid and weapizing of the doj by the demafasict

Retrieving classified documents hidden away by a former government employee is uncontroversial.

The DoJ is doing it’s job.

 

[OKTexas]

Intent to do what exactly? You’re not being accurate about what was said, nor does it bear relation to the email issue.

I don’t have to prove shit because it’s up to the criminal justice system to prove their case.

What you’re saying doesn’t even make sense since we aren’t talking about classified documents like one would receive in briefings, these are email discussions of high level state dept employees that mention classified documents. It doesn’t make sense to accuse her of stripping headers that clearly never existed in the first place.

That's a lie, she instructed her staff to remove the headers and send unsecure.

.