this is your science guy who is factually wrongHilarious
Where did you get you internets climate degree?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
this is your science guy who is factually wrongHilarious
Where did you get you internets climate degree?
this is your science guy who is factually wrong
the very first question to ask a know it all, is to provide your data!!! And Michael Mann said fk you! End of discussion and the climate guy loses.Well we know that's a shameless lie. I have given you the opportunity. Many times.
it's obvious you didn't. or you conveniently turned the sound down. but, it's all right there where the experts are.Shut up stupid. You didn't watch the video and wouldn't understand it if you did.
this is your science guy who is factually wrong
Wuhan, vaccines and climate. Any who’s eating out of the hand of elites is compromised and he shows the tantrum of the scam pushAbout what?
HilariousWuhan, vaccines and climate. Any who’s eating out of the hand of elites is compromised and he shows the tantrum of the scam push
did you watch? obviously you didn't. The five democrats on the show stated exactly what it looked like.Hilarious
Who made this determination?
It is not from a model. It is from a calculation. "In panel (a) ERFs for well-mixed greenhouse gases (WMGHGs) are from the analytical formulae". You should read the captions.That includes the feedback which is from a flawed model. Look at the emergent component to see the radiative forcing of CO2.
It is not from a model. It is from a calculation. "In panel (a) ERFs for well-mixed greenhouse gases (WMGHGs) are from the analytical formulae". You should read the captions.
Where?ibid
Where does ibid tell you to look? Oh, sorry. I have that graphic on my desktop and there was no link. That's from AR6, WGI, Technical Summary, TS-15.Where?
Where does ibid tell you to look? Oh, sorry. I have that graphic on my desktop and there was no link. That's from AR6, WGI, Technical Summary, TS-15.
Founded in 1984, it worked with tobacco company Philip Morris throughout the 1990s to attempt to discredit the health risks of secondhand smoke and lobby against smoking bans.[3]: 233–234 [4] Since the 2000s, the Heartland Institute has been a leading promoter of climate change denial.
They’re my science than the IPCCThe Heartland Institute debunking AR6? Isn't that a little like the Seychelles People's Defense Force taking out the 82nd and the 101st combined?
Do you know where the edit button is located? And that's bullshit, just like Heartland.They’re my science than the IPCC
What is it you think they know? Have you personally seen them work?I can go read what they say already. I defer to them. You do not. So your request is absurd on its face
He has personally seen them judged by their peers. What "peers" judge the work Heartland's employees do?What is it you think they know? Have you personally seen them work?