Its called NATURE!!!!

Dr.Destructo

Gold Member
Jan 14, 2024
261
252
158

Its called NATURE

Its what happens when the planet starts another shift change.

Its not the apocolypse, its not "climate change", its not a depleted ozone, its not carbon monoxide, its not drilling, its not the ice caps melting........

ITS THE PLANET DOING WHAT ITS BEEN DOING FOR BILLIONS OF YEARS!!!!!
1715904162402.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
She may have her face tattooed on his neck
 

Its called NATURE you fuktard!!!

Its what happens when the planet starts another shift change.

Its not the apocolypse, its not "climate change", its not a depleted ozone, its not carbon monoxide, its not drilling, its not the ice caps melting........

ITS THE PLANET DOING WHAT ITS BEEN DOING FOR BILLIONS OF YEARS!!!!!
View attachment 947780
Could you explain to us what you mean by "shift change"?
 

Its called NATURE you fuktard!!!

Its what happens when the planet starts another shift change.

Its not the apocolypse, its not "climate change", its not a depleted ozone, its not carbon monoxide, its not drilling, its not the ice caps melting........

ITS THE PLANET DOING WHAT ITS BEEN DOING FOR BILLIONS OF YEARS!!!!!
View attachment 947780

Great another idiot denier.
 

Its called NATURE you fuktard!!!

Its what happens when the planet starts another shift change.

Its not the apocolypse, its not "climate change", its not a depleted ozone, its not carbon monoxide, its not drilling, its not the ice caps melting........

ITS THE PLANET DOING WHAT ITS BEEN DOING FOR BILLIONS OF YEARS!!!!!
View attachment 947780

Bleaching events are actually common when Corals are stressed which they have done for millions of years to reset themselves to a different organism to take its place and once again goes back to normal.
 
All it's about is the covid relief fund monies still out there that is available for grift.....That's what FJB & Co. are using to fund the Green New Deal with......They just want their cut.
 
If we don't keep corals in check, they could damage the hulls of the left's mega-yachts well before they damage the right's MAGA-bass boats. This should be a bi-partisan effort.
 
Bleaching events are actually common when Corals are stressed which they have done for millions of years to reset themselves to a different organism to take its place and once again goes back to normal.
What do you mean by "reset themselves to a different organism"? Do you think there is some other symbiotic algae waiting in the wings?
 
What do you mean by "reset themselves to a different organism"? Do you think there is some other symbiotic algae waiting in the wings?
Do you believe this is any different from previous interglacial periods which were warmer?
 
Do you believe this is any different from previous interglacial periods which were warmer?
I believe the warming is taking place many times as quickly and thus providing only a small fraction of the time required for organisms to adapt. The rapid rate of change is the cause of most of the issues AGW has created. Ocean acidification did not take place in prior instances of high CO2 levels because the changes came on so slowly that the water cycle was able to buffer itself raining down over calcium and magnesium carbonates on the continental margins.
 
Last edited:
I believe the warming is taking place many times as quickly and thus providing only a small fraction of the time required for organisms to adapt. The rapid rate of change is the cause of most of the issues AGW has created. Ocean acidification did not take place in prior instances of high CO2 levels because the changes came on so slowly that the water cycle was able to buffer itself raining down over calcium and magnesium carbonates on the continental margins.
That’s idiotic.
 
That’s idiotic.



No. You're rejection of basic science is idiotic.
 



No. You're rejection of basic science is idiotic.
My rejection of your idiotic belief that the rate of change of temperature - which is minuscule compared to the rate of changes of the seasons - somehow is worse than an interglacial period which was 2C warmer than today.
 
My rejection of your idiotic belief that the rate of change of temperature - which is minuscule compared to the rate of changes of the seasons - somehow is worse than an interglacial period which was 2C warmer than today.
Let's see: one one side of this argument we have NASA, NOAA and the Royal Society (among many others). On the other side we have Ding and no one else, who thinks NASA, NOAA and The Royal Society have failed to take seasons into account and who doesn't yet seem to realize (or perhaps just doesn't WANT to realize) that the discussion is not about absolute temperatures but RATES OF CHANGE.
 
Let's see: one one side of this argument we have NASA, NOAA and the Royal Society (among many others). On the other side we have Ding and no one else, who thinks NASA, NOAA and The Royal Society have failed to take seasons into account and who doesn't yet seem to realize (or perhaps just doesn't WANT to realize) that the discussion is not about absolute temperatures but RATES OF CHANGE.
Actually the other side of the argument is the geologic record.
 

Forum List

Back
Top