Is the FBI a bunch of racists?

Gracie

Diamond Member
Feb 13, 2013
69,312
30,667
2,330
Lost
  • According the National Crime Victimization Survey, an estimated 62,593 blacks were the victims of white violence, and 320,082 whites were the victims of black violence.
  • Given the disparity in population, blacks attack whites at a level that is 25 times more frequently than vice versa.
Google. See for yourself. And this was dated 2012.
 
Last edited:
So sorry. Dated 2011.

FBI.jpg


According to the data, in 2011 there were 3,172 white killed, 83% by other whites and 14% by blacks. 2,695 blacks were killed, 91% of these were killed by other blacks.

Since whites make up 77.7% of the U.S. population and blacks account for 13.2%, there are 6 times as many white people in America as black people.
 
Now..the idiots that think I am racist can whine all they want, but facts are facts. So I guess that means those who keep track of this crap..like the FBI...are all racists too. Ok.
 
I been attempting to point out the data to these assholes for a decade. Their goal is to silence us and the police as they simply don't care about evidence, data or reality as blacks won't stop killing, raping and doing violent crimes.

Blacks kill over 10 times per capita as many whites per year. Yet, all we hear is that whites are slaughtering blacks. Reality doesn't mean a thing to these people.
 
But the numbers are incomplete at best. Many states do not even report all the numbers. Some report none at all.

However, based on Gracie's information, let's do some really simple math:

77.7 / 13.2 = 5.89, meaning there are almost 6 times as many Whites as Blacks in our Union.

320,082 / 62,593 = 5.11, meaning a little more than 5 times as many whites died due to black violence than visa versa. So, less whites died in relation to their actual take of the total population, because 5.11 is LESS than 5.89.

But there are 6 times as many white citzens to begin with. There are bound to be more white deaths per year than black deaths, regardless at the hands of whomever, because there are simply so many more whites in the USA to begin with. The sheer numerical discrepancy makes this quite obvious.

Now, some simple math should be easy for anyone to understand.

Let's assume a population of exactly 320,000,000 people. That was the estimate at the end of 2013, we can take it as a baseline.

320,082 / 320,000,000 = 0.1% of the US population died in 2011 as a result of B on W violence.

Ok, let's see how much that figure is of the total White population of the USA:

320,000,000 * 0.777 = 248,640,000

320,082 / 248,640,000 = 0.12% of the white population.

Same thing with blacks:

62,593 / 320,000,000 = 0.02% of the US population.

And calculated for the actual number of blacks in the USA:

320,000,000 * 0.14 = 44,800,000

62,593 / 44,800,000 = 0.13% of the black population.

So, according to your statistics, the same PERCENTAGE of the respective populations died at the hands of the "other race" in 2011.

So, your point?

Really, math kicks peoples' asses every single time.

Plus, the stats are not broken down by multiple-murders, gang violence, etc...

So, why would you think that the FBI is racist?

:wtf:
 
320,082 / 62,593 = 5.11, meaning a little more than 5 times as many whites died due to black violence than visa versa. So, less whites died in relation to their actual take of the total population, because 5.11 is LESS than 5.89.
Your innumeracy is legendary. Simple math indeed. 320,082 / 62,593 = 19.55. idiot. Why do you keep trying?!

Get a life and stay away form mathematics.
 
What I find bizarre is why these numbers are not used in immigration debates. Those other race numbers sure makes it look like it's safe to brain drain Asia and Latin America at far faster rates than what we are doing.
 
320,082 / 62,593 = 5.11, meaning a little more than 5 times as many whites died due to black violence than visa versa. So, less whites died in relation to their actual take of the total population, because 5.11 is LESS than 5.89.
Your innumeracy is legendary. Simple math indeed. 320,082 / 62,593 = 19.55. idiot. Why do you keep trying?!

Get a life and stay away form mathematics.

Whutt???

Uh, 30 / 6 = 5
300 / 60 = 5
3000 / 600 = 5
30,000 / 6,000 = 5
300,000 / 60,000 = 5

320,082 / 32,593 = 5.11, just as I wrote.

I enjoyed watching Meathead shit all over himself with simple math.

The / sign means "division", you nutbag.

Gawd, that was fun!!
 
Last edited:
320,082 / 62,593 = 5.11, meaning a little more than 5 times as many whites died due to black violence than visa versa. So, less whites died in relation to their actual take of the total population, because 5.11 is LESS than 5.89.
Your innumeracy is legendary. Simple math indeed. 320,082 / 62,593 = 19.55. idiot. Why do you keep trying?!

Get a life and stay away form mathematics.
?

You really should check yourself before calling people idiots....

320,082/62,593 is indeed 5.11

62,593 * 19.55 is 1,223,693.15 I have no idea how you came up with your math....

I have an issue with his methodology because it ignores the fact that a mere 13 percent of the population accounts for around 50 percent of the violent crimes. The sad part here is NOT that blacks are going around killing whites - they are going around and killing other blacks. The process is self repeating - blacks kill more blacks meaning many many black children are without a father in broken homes. Not just the murdered father but also the one that is sitting in a prison cell rotting away. That boy grows up to become yet another criminal and repeats the process. It is a damn mess.
 
320,082 / 62,593 = 5.11, meaning a little more than 5 times as many whites died due to black violence than visa versa. So, less whites died in relation to their actual take of the total population, because 5.11 is LESS than 5.89.
Your innumeracy is legendary. Simple math indeed. 320,082 / 62,593 = 19.55. idiot. Why do you keep trying?!

Get a life and stay away form mathematics.
Whutt? ?? Lol

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk

Uh, 30 / 6 = 5
300 / 60 = 5
3000 / 600 = 5
30,000 / 6,000 = 5
300,000 / 60,000 = 5

320,082 / 32,593 = 5.11, just as I wrote.

I enjoyed watching you shit all over yourself with simple math.

The / sign means "division", you nutbag.

Gawd, that was fun!!
well.... you ninja'd me :D
 
320,082 / 62,593 = 5.11, meaning a little more than 5 times as many whites died due to black violence than visa versa. So, less whites died in relation to their actual take of the total population, because 5.11 is LESS than 5.89.
Your innumeracy is legendary. Simple math indeed. 320,082 / 62,593 = 19.55. idiot. Why do you keep trying?!

Get a life and stay away form mathematics.
?

You really should check yourself before calling people idiots....

320,082/62,593 is indeed 5.11

62,593 * 19.55 is 1,223,693.15 I have no idea how you came up with your math....

I have an issue with his methodology because it ignores the fact that a mere 13 percent of the population accounts for around 50 percent of the violent crimes. The sad part here is NOT that blacks are going around killing whites - they are going around and killing other blacks. The process is self repeating - blacks kill more blacks meaning many many black children are without a father in broken homes. Not just the murdered father but also the one that is sitting in a prison cell rotting away. That boy grows up to become yet another criminal and repeats the process. It is a damn mess.
He got them switched around, the poor fool. 62 K divided by 320 K must be around 19.5%, because 6 is one fifth of 30, or 20% of 30. Apparently, he is too stupid to know which number is to be divided. Ahhhhh, Meathead genius, a thing to behold. .... lol.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk
 
320,082 / 62,593 = 5.11, meaning a little more than 5 times as many whites died due to black violence than visa versa. So, less whites died in relation to their actual take of the total population, because 5.11 is LESS than 5.89.
Your innumeracy is legendary. Simple math indeed. 320,082 / 62,593 = 19.55. idiot. Why do you keep trying?!

Get a life and stay away form mathematics.
?

You really should check yourself before calling people idiots....

320,082/62,593 is indeed 5.11

62,593 * 19.55 is 1,223,693.15 I have no idea how you came up with your math....

I have an issue with his methodology because it ignores the fact that a mere 13 percent of the population accounts for around 50 percent of the violent crimes. The sad part here is NOT that blacks are going around killing whites - they are going around and killing other blacks. The process is self repeating - blacks kill more blacks meaning many many black children are without a father in broken homes. Not just the murdered father but also the one that is sitting in a prison cell rotting away. That boy grows up to become yet another criminal and repeats the process. It is a damn mess.
No. Individuals within that 13% of the population have committed a higher rate of these crimes, not the entire 13% of our population itself. This is where racists, like lemmings, jump right off the cliff.

Frankly, any criminal statistic should be disturbing to all of us. Esp in the 21st century.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk
 
320,082 / 62,593 = 5.11, meaning a little more than 5 times as many whites died due to black violence than visa versa. So, less whites died in relation to their actual take of the total population, because 5.11 is LESS than 5.89.
Your innumeracy is legendary. Simple math indeed. 320,082 / 62,593 = 19.55. idiot. Why do you keep trying?!

Get a life and stay away form mathematics.
?

You really should check yourself before calling people idiots....

320,082/62,593 is indeed 5.11

62,593 * 19.55 is 1,223,693.15 I have no idea how you came up with your math....

I have an issue with his methodology because it ignores the fact that a mere 13 percent of the population accounts for around 50 percent of the violent crimes. The sad part here is NOT that blacks are going around killing whites - they are going around and killing other blacks. The process is self repeating - blacks kill more blacks meaning many many black children are without a father in broken homes. Not just the murdered father but also the one that is sitting in a prison cell rotting away. That boy grows up to become yet another criminal and repeats the process. It is a damn mess.
He got them switched around, the poor fool. 62 K divided by 320 K must be around 19.5%, because 6 is one fifth of 30, or 20% of 30. Apparently, he is too stupid to know which number is to be divided. Ahhhhh, Meathead genius, a thing to behold. .... lol.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk
Don't be an ass. 19.55% of the murders blacks commit are against whites/hispanics, not 5.11. Since blacks commit half of the murders in the country, clearly 10% of all murders are black on non-black essentially, while 40% are black on black. Trying to mitigate the problem with train wrecks of statistics is something you keep failing at.

Race plays a far greater role in murder rates than anything else, even when Hispanics are heaped in with whites by the FBI.
 
320,082 / 62,593 = 5.11, meaning a little more than 5 times as many whites died due to black violence than visa versa. So, less whites died in relation to their actual take of the total population, because 5.11 is LESS than 5.89.
Your innumeracy is legendary. Simple math indeed. 320,082 / 62,593 = 19.55. idiot. Why do you keep trying?!

Get a life and stay away form mathematics.
?

You really should check yourself before calling people idiots....

320,082/62,593 is indeed 5.11

62,593 * 19.55 is 1,223,693.15 I have no idea how you came up with your math....

I have an issue with his methodology because it ignores the fact that a mere 13 percent of the population accounts for around 50 percent of the violent crimes. The sad part here is NOT that blacks are going around killing whites - they are going around and killing other blacks. The process is self repeating - blacks kill more blacks meaning many many black children are without a father in broken homes. Not just the murdered father but also the one that is sitting in a prison cell rotting away. That boy grows up to become yet another criminal and repeats the process. It is a damn mess.
No. Individuals within that 13% of the population have committed a higher rate of these crimes, not the entire 13% of our population itself. This is where racists, like lemmings, jump right off the cliff.

Frankly, any criminal statistic should be disturbing to all of us. Esp in the 21st century.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk
I didn't mean to imply it was the entire 13% and not simply a percentage of them but you must admit that it should NOT be the case that a demographic containing only 13% of the population also contains almost 50% of the violent criminals. That points to a SERIOUS disparity in the crime rate.

And, like I said, it is a self fulfilling prophesy. Because people tend to commit crimes against the same demographic as the one they belong to, you end up with a criminal segment of the population that continues itself.

This is not simply a statistical anomaly - there are underlying causes for a disparity this large.
He got them switched around, the poor fool. 62 K divided by 320 K must be around 19.5%, because 6 is one fifth of 30, or 20% of 30. Apparently, he is too stupid to know which number is to be divided. Ahhhhh, Meathead genius, a thing to behold. .... lol.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk
Yes, that was it. I tried all kinds of things to make the slip make sense but I never thought to reverse the numbers.
 
320,082 / 62,593 = 5.11, meaning a little more than 5 times as many whites died due to black violence than visa versa. So, less whites died in relation to their actual take of the total population, because 5.11 is LESS than 5.89.
Your innumeracy is legendary. Simple math indeed. 320,082 / 62,593 = 19.55. idiot. Why do you keep trying?!

Get a life and stay away form mathematics.
?

You really should check yourself before calling people idiots....

320,082/62,593 is indeed 5.11

62,593 * 19.55 is 1,223,693.15 I have no idea how you came up with your math....

I have an issue with his methodology because it ignores the fact that a mere 13 percent of the population accounts for around 50 percent of the violent crimes. The sad part here is NOT that blacks are going around killing whites - they are going around and killing other blacks. The process is self repeating - blacks kill more blacks meaning many many black children are without a father in broken homes. Not just the murdered father but also the one that is sitting in a prison cell rotting away. That boy grows up to become yet another criminal and repeats the process. It is a damn mess.
He got them switched around, the poor fool. 62 K divided by 320 K must be around 19.5%, because 6 is one fifth of 30, or 20% of 30. Apparently, he is too stupid to know which number is to be divided. Ahhhhh, Meathead genius, a thing to behold. .... lol.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk
Don't be an ass. 19.55% of the murders blacks commit are against whites/hispanics, not 5.11. Since blacks commit half of the murders in the country, clearly 10% of all murders are black on non-black essentially, while 40% are black on black. Trying to mitigate the problem with train wrecks of statistics is something you keep failing at.

Race plays a far greater role in murder rates than anything else, even when Hispanics are heaped in with whites by the FBI.
That is still incorrect. The numbers Statis were noting were not murders as he incorrectly stated but victims of violent crimes. Nowhere can I get your 19% figure to make any sense with those numbers. If we go to murders:

Blacks committed 2958 murders in the year cited (post 2 givers the figures 448 against whites, 2447 against blacks, 36 against other and 27 unknown). With 448 against whites that means 448/2958 gives you around 15%.

The numbers are retracting from any real debate though.
 
the REAL problem is the black community does not want to face THE problem.
PC crap doesn't help either. Decades ago Mensa stopped pointing out that there was a negative correlation between percentage of white ancestry and black IQ. You ever hear that argument in bell curve debates?
 

Forum List

Back
Top