Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
probably "concept we developed"What do you mean by artifact of intelligence?
Yes. Man's intelligence. That is why the concept varies so much between cultures and evolves over time. An example is the OT focus on an eye for an eye and the NT focus on turning the other cheek.Do you believe the construct of good and evil to be an artifact of intelligence?
Do lower forms of animal life consider the concepts of good and evil?What do you mean by artifact of intelligence?
Do lower forms of animal life consider the concepts of good and evil?What do you mean by artifact of intelligence?
An example, if a Polar Bear catches and eats a salmon from a stream, does the salmon consider the bear evil? Does the bear consider that eating the fish is evil?
Exactly. Which means you need more intelligence to construct the concept of good and evil.Do lower forms of animal life consider the concepts of good and evil?What do you mean by artifact of intelligence?
An example, if a Polar Bear catches and eats a salmon from a stream, does the salmon consider the bear evil? Does the bear consider that eating the fish is evil?
The bear looks at the salmon as food and the salmon looks at the bear as something that wants to eat him.
There is no good nor evil.
Its all innate.
I mean is it a product of intelligence or an outcome of intelligence or a natural result of intelligence.What do you mean by artifact of intelligence?
Has it ever been diametrically opposed? Has man celebrated being evil for the sake of being evil?Yes. Man's intelligence. That is why the concept varies so much between cultures and evolves over time. An example is the OT focus on an eye for an eye and the NT focus on turning the other cheek.Do you believe the construct of good and evil to be an artifact of intelligence?
No need, man just redefines evil. Do you know an evil that can't be redefined as good by some culture?Has it ever been diametrically opposed? Has man celebrated being evil for the sake of being evil?Yes. Man's intelligence. That is why the concept varies so much between cultures and evolves over time. An example is the OT focus on an eye for an eye and the NT focus on turning the other cheek.Do you believe the construct of good and evil to be an artifact of intelligence?
Can you provide an example of what you are discussing?No need, man just redefines evil. Do you know an evil that can't be redefined as good by some culture?Has it ever been diametrically opposed? Has man celebrated being evil for the sake of being evil?Yes. Man's intelligence. That is why the concept varies so much between cultures and evolves over time. An example is the OT focus on an eye for an eye and the NT focus on turning the other cheek.Do you believe the construct of good and evil to be an artifact of intelligence?
Can you provide a culture that finds the eating of still-born infants as good?No need, man just redefines evil. Do you know an evil that can't be redefined as good by some culture?Has it ever been diametrically opposed? Has man celebrated being evil for the sake of being evil?Yes. Man's intelligence. That is why the concept varies so much between cultures and evolves over time. An example is the OT focus on an eye for an eye and the NT focus on turning the other cheek.Do you believe the construct of good and evil to be an artifact of intelligence?
What do you mean by artifact of intelligence?
Do you believe the construct of good and evil to be an artifact of intelligence?
Not off hand but that doesn't mean there was never one. A lot of cultures practiced cannibalism so it doesn't seem like much of a stretch. I bet the Donner party would have looked on the practice with less disdain than we might.Can you provide a culture that finds the eating of still-born infants as good?No need, man just redefines evil. Do you know an evil that can't be redefined as good by some culture?Has it ever been diametrically opposed? Has man celebrated being evil for the sake of being evil?Yes. Man's intelligence. That is why the concept varies so much between cultures and evolves over time. An example is the OT focus on an eye for an eye and the NT focus on turning the other cheek.Do you believe the construct of good and evil to be an artifact of intelligence?
We generally consider killing innocent children to be evil (lets ignore the abortion thing). We also bombed German cities knowing that innocent children would be killed and hailed those that dropped the bombs as heroes.Can you provide an example of what you are discussing?No need, man just redefines evil. Do you know an evil that can't be redefined as good by some culture?Has it ever been diametrically opposed? Has man celebrated being evil for the sake of being evil?Yes. Man's intelligence. That is why the concept varies so much between cultures and evolves over time. An example is the OT focus on an eye for an eye and the NT focus on turning the other cheek.Do you believe the construct of good and evil to be an artifact of intelligence?