Did I infer your position incorrectly? I wrote "We also bombed German cities knowing that innocent children would be killed". I think we can all agree that killing innocent children is an evil thing to do and that allowing Naziis to control Europe, N. Africa, etc. would also be an evil. In such a case, killing innocent children maybe the lessor to the two evils.No. I don’t believe I did say that killing a child is the lesser of two evils.Killing a child is an evil but, as you've said, sometimes it is the lesser of two evils.Now if you were trying to say that good can come from bad, that is true but we should never rationalize that bad is good.Sometimes evil is good.
Please address the words I write and I promise to do the same for you. Fair enough?
Keeps the problem that all the mass-murder "you" was doing on Germans in Germany made the war longer and not shorter and had costed much more victims - specially in the Holocaust too. And keeps the problem, that the mad man Hitler and his criminal gang were in general a result of the mad situation of Germany during and after world war 1. I guess without the USA we Germans including Austria-Hungaria and the Osman empire and others had won world war 1. England, France, Russia and their allies had lost. I am not sure in which world we would live in this case today. But I do not have the feeling it would be a worser world, than we see today.
Sorry if I mischaracterized your position. Please clarify.
I fear, you justify with this sentence on reason of a simplifying national identity now murder on children in a similiar way, how the Nazis justified murder on the children of Jews.
]
lol more rubbish. Germany inflicted WW I on itself as well; Hitler was going to be your Saviour, and your ancestors probably voted for him.