Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The propositions does not make sense from this perspective , as if you are indicating that anything that does exist is good ( light ) while anything that does not exist ( dark ) is evil , that is an over simplified description that completely ignores interaction of everything else in between .No, that definition is a recognition that although a coin has two sides it is still a single coin and not two coins. Evil is the negation of good. Unless of course you believe that good is the negation of evil. The question is which attribute is the extant attribute. I say the extant attribute is good. Therefore, evil exists as the negation of the extant attribute. For example, cold does not exist. Cold is the absence of heat. Darkness does not exist. Darkness is the absence of light. Now do you understand?
Only if you don't realize the distribution is bounded by good and the absence of good." Psycho Babble Justification For Pretentious Role Play "
* Making Know No Sense *
Makes no sense to me unless you are indicating that anything that does exist is good ( light ) while anything that does not exist ( dark ) is evil , which completely ignore the interaction of everything else in between .
![]()
Quantum superposition - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
![]()
Superposition principle - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
A conjecture by those promoting mono the is them is based on a concept of a monad , a smallest geometric entity of which all things are comprised , an identity element of an infinite identity set , an infinitesimal that includes a quality of infinitude as ascribed to an irrational number .This supposes that all there is is the material world. As I work through the first cause conundrum, I don't see how anything material can be eternal and unchanging.
" And we know that the natural, physical universe changes, thus was caused. " is a logical fallacy used for appealing to absurdity for the goading of fools .Ergo, mind has always existed as the source or matrix of the material world. It is primarily physicists who have posited the interplay of mind and matter and the primacy of mind.
Stop confusing a literal meaning of an after life , which is genetic continuance , with a means by which to achieve a metaphorical eternal life .Only if you don't realize the distribution is bounded by good and the absence of good.
" Psycho Babble Justification For Pretentious Role Play "" Exemplifying Egoism Of Uniform Fetish Myopia Of Id "
* First Cause Contradiction With Eternal *
A conjecture by those promoting mono the is them is based on a concept of a monad , a smallest geometric entity of which all things are comprised , an identity element of an infinite identity set , an infinitesimal that includes a quality of infinitude as ascribed to an irrational number .
A quality of infinitude includes a property of being and becoming through some transition , without end or beginning , that is , was and will become , with an implicit cause that necessarily exists .
* Fantasy Writers Selling Personified Goads *
" And we know that the natural, physical universe changes, thus was caused. " is a logical fallacy used for appealing to absurdity for the goading of fools .
An iconography of capitalizing an abbreviation of a " go ad " eponym includes a pretentious allusion for precedence of claims to personify yearn willful insecurities about mortality , while expecting validity for public policy based on ethereal claims that doubt is an excuse to justify anything including faith .
* Absence Of Sentience Sapience Introspection And Success Criteria Of Nature *
Stop confusing a literal meaning of an after life , which is genetic continuance , with a means by which to achieve a metaphorical eternal life .
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_priori_and_a_posteriori
A priori knowledge is independent from any experience. Examples include mathematics, tautologies and deduction from pure reason.[ii] A posteriori knowledge depends on empirical evidence.
Good thing I didn't make that argument. Try re-reading what I wrote to understand the point I made." And we know that the natural, physical universe changes, thus was caused. " is a logical fallacy used for appealing to absurdity for the goading of fools .
Maybe any one of those things, or possibly all of them, but that's not what it says in the Genesis. You got a scripture that says anything other than Adam and Eve eating of that tree being the cause.
Metaphor, dumbass.
I haven't gotten within a hundred miles of an after life. That's never been a focus of mine. I'm focused on the journey. I'm focused on living in the moment. That's where God can be found.Stop confusing a literal meaning of an after life , which is genetic continuance , with a means by which to achieve a metaphorical eternal life .
The first three Chinese dynasties worshipped Shang Di who was the God of Abraham. They taught the Garden was to the west.The genesis states ya ah way weigh built a garden east of eden , so which way is west ?
Sure , happy dasein .I haven't gotten within a hundred miles of an after life. That's never been a focus of mine. I'm focused on the journey. I'm focused on living in the moment. That's where God can be found.
At any point in our lives we are the sum of our choices. We are free to do any dumb thing we want but we are not free from not experiencing the consequences of doing dumb things. Choose wisely." Reflex Rules Of Nature "
* Indifferent To Yearn Life Journey But Mind Your Own Business *
Sure , happy dasein .
Just make sure to keep yearn delusions and metaphors of an after life in check , especially when it comes to dictating and promoting traitorous acts against us republic and its credo to promote independence of the individual .
* Inchoate Bias From Geometry *
An infinitesimal is inchoate and indifferent to even outcomes , which may substantiate claims for free will .
The first three Chinese dynasties worshipped Shang Di who was the God of Abraham. They taught the Garden was to the west.
Humans are compulsive. It's an artifact of being an animal. Not everyone can escape it." Avoiding Compulsions "
* Divining Roads *
Taoism (/ˈdaʊ.ɪzəm/ ⓘ, /ˈtaʊ.ɪzəm/ ⓘ) or Daoism is a diverse philosophical and religious tradition indigenous to China, emphasizing harmony with the Tao—generally understood as an impersonal, enigmatic process of transformation ultimately underlying reality.[1][2] It is one of the most important ideologies in Chinese thought. The concept originates in the Chinese word Dao 道 (pinyin: dào; Wade–Giles: tao4), whose numerous meanings include 'way', 'road', and 'technique'.![]()
Taoism - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Huanjing bunao (traditional Chinese: 還精補腦; simplified Chinese: 还精补脑; lit. 'returning the semen/essence to replenish the brain' or coitus reservatus) is a Daoist sexual practice and yangsheng ("nourishing life") method aimed at maintaining arousal for an extended plateau phase while avoiding orgasm. According to this practice, retaining unejaculated jing (精, "semen; [medical] essence of life") supposedly allows it to rise through the spine to nourish the brain and enhance overall well-being. Daoist adepts have been exploring various methods to avoid ejaculation for more than two thousand years.![]()
Huanjing bunao - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Edging, sometimes also referred to as gooning[1][2] or surfing,[3] is a sexual technique whereby an orgasm is controlled (that is, delayed or prevented). It is practiced alone or with a partner and involves the maintenance of a high level of sexual arousal for an extended period without reaching climax.[4]![]()
Edging (sexual practice) - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
![]()
Taoist sexual practices - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Not sure how it makes sense when I can find none of the reasons you listed in the Bible. Perhaps you can teach me where you found that you have to experience good and bad to know the difference. Book and verse please.I would never trust your interpretation of Genesis because it makes no sense. In other words, I wouldn't believe it either if I interpreted it your way. My way makes sense. Your way makes no sense.
Common sense. It's not hard if you actually try to understand it. But that's not how you have been reading it. You've been reading it to confirm you pre-conceived ideas about it. It's not that you don't possess the intellect to do the job right, it's that you don't possess the desire to do the job right.Not sure how it makes sense when I can find none of the reasons you listed in the Bible. Perhaps you can teach me where you found that you have to experience good and bad to know the difference. Book and verse please.
" If the glove does not fit , you must acquit . " , yet has anyone ever tried to put on a leather glove while already wearing a rubber glove , as it is largely impossible ?Common sense. It's not hard if you actually try to understand it. But that's not how you have been reading it. You've been reading it to confirm you pre-conceived ideas about it. It's not that you don't possess the intellect to do the job right, it's that you don't possess the desire to do the job right.
Maybe start with the context of the book. Use your common sense. What is it that YOU think this book is? Because if you start from that position it will make more sense.
It's only impossible if one does not try. For everything else it's a non-zero probability." Semantic Rhetoric Without Formal Demonstration Or Reference *
* Ranting About Nothing And Fluffy Bunny Slippers*
" If the glove does not fit , you must acquit . " , yet has anyone ever tried to put on a leather glove while already wearing a rubber glove , as it is largely impossible ?
Thank you. Now I understand. It's not so much what the Bible actually says as it is how you feel about it. That makes so much more sense than the common claim that Christians actually care about what is on the page. That makes it so much better than man's efforts to govern. With the constitution, we have to go through a cumbersome process to amend it, but with your take on the bible, all you have to do is get enough TV preacher to repeat your new beliefs, and they become dogma, at least for now. Thank you so much for clearing that up for me, and all the other people who mistakenly believed the Bible is supposed to actually means what it says. You so smart.Common sense. It's not hard if you actually try to understand it. But that's not how you have been reading it. You've been reading it to confirm you pre-conceived ideas about it. It's not that you don't possess the intellect to do the job right, it's that you don't possess the desire to do the job right.
Maybe start with the context of the book. Use your common sense. What is it that YOU think this book is? Because if you start from that position it will make more sense.
Not even close. Maybe you don't have the intelligence to work through this. My bad.Thank you. Now I understand. It's not so much what the Bible actually says as it is how you feel about it. That makes so much more sense than the common claim that Christians actually care about what is on the page. That makes it so much better than man's efforts to govern. With the constitution, we have to go through a cumbersome process to amend it, but with your take on the bible, all you have to do is get enough TV preacher to repeat your new beliefs, and they become dogma, at least for now. Thank you so much for clearing that up for me, and all the other people who mistakenly believed the Bible is supposed to actually means what it says. You so smart.