frigidweirdo
Diamond Member
- Mar 7, 2014
- 55,008
- 15,192
- 2,180
- Thread starter
- #61
Yeah, it is. Creativity can be quantified by value, aesthetic appreciation, or emotional impact. Value is the only OBJECTIVE method of quantification.
All others are subjective.
You just hate that it can be broken down so simply.
No, you're not even close to making that argument.
You just said someone buys a painting for its creativity. But you didn't show that this is so. You're just expecting me to accept your false premise in the hope that it'll gain you something. It won't.
Value quantifies VALUE. Nothing else.
How much something is worth is based on what people will pay for it. A person might want to pay more for a Rembrandt simply because they studied the art of that era and because they have the money to pay for it.
Someone else might pay that much because they think it will appreciate in value.
I already showed you that a Rembrandt, which isn't very creative, is worth much more than a painting by someone who is very creative.
The Psychology of Art Valuation: Why People Pay Millions for Masterpieces - Money Talks HQ
Discover the hidden psychology behind art valuation. Learn why people spend millions on masterpieces and how emotions, prestige, and culture influence the art market.
moneyboosthub.com
"The Psychology of Art Valuation: Why People Pay Millions for Masterpieces"
"Art has long been a symbol of culture, wealth, and personal expression. But why do some artworks sell for millions while others remain relatively affordable? The answer lies in a complex mix of historical significance, rarity, and market perception."
This website lists many things that impact the value of a painting. There isn't one. Which means it doesn't quantify one thing.
It cannot be broken down that simply. I'm assuming that because you're a ******* idiot, you want to make it simple. Then you've simplified something down to the point where it's so useless, the only purpose is so you can tell yourself you're not an idiot.
Well, based on your argument, you're dumber than a ******* first grader.