Is Adam And Eve's Ethnicity White?

If Adam and Eve were white, where did Asians come from? :dunno:
 
If Adam and Eve were white, where did Asians come from? :dunno:
There are white Asians. There are dark skinned Asians. Isolation and interbreeding will produce different KINDS. We call these "kinds" races today.
 
They probably didn't exist.

They are just some ancient Hebrew folk tale of creation that eventually found its way on paper.
 
Adam and Eve are archetypes, and the tale of how Knowledge, the concepts of Good and Evil, entered human existence, is fascinating. It tells us flat out that as soon as we started judging Good and Bad, we were toast. And like the idiots we are, we created an entire religion out of it. Several religions. LOL
 
Is Adam And Eve's Ethnicity White?
So were they caucasian? Are people like dog breeds?

i dont know exactly who is adam in this picture

human-evolution-faces.jpg
 
Either way he was Black.

Possibly, although Noah definitely did not exist. If he did, then the world would show evidence of being flooded in 3000 BC.

By 3000 BC, the skin color of most humans would have adapted so that most generations born above the equation would be Caucasian. There are a number of explanations for how Noah could be black, but they would rely on Noah being born in some place like Ethiopia, or not having ancestry in the land he was born at.

With no knowledge of where Noah was born or the skin color of his ancestors (again, he probably did not exist), I would say that claim is without merit.
 
Either way he was Black.

Possibly, although Noah definitely did not exist. If he did, then the world would show evidence of being flooded in 3000 BC.

By 3000 BC, the skin color of most humans would have adapted so that most generations born above the equation would be Caucasian. There are a number of explanations for how Noah could be black, but they would rely on Noah being born in some place like Ethiopia, or not having ancestry in the land he was born at.

With no knowledge of where Noah was born or the skin color of his ancestors (again, he probably did not exist), I would say that claim is without merit.
There is actually wide, scientifically accepted evidence of major flooding at the end of the last ice age. Noah's tale didn't have to occur the day before the story was recorded. Flooding disrupted civilizations all around the Mediterranean and probably elsewhere. Have a little respect for history.
 
Either way he was Black.

Possibly, although Noah definitely did not exist. If he did, then the world would show evidence of being flooded in 3000 BC.

By 3000 BC, the skin color of most humans would have adapted so that most generations born above the equation would be Caucasian. There are a number of explanations for how Noah could be black, but they would rely on Noah being born in some place like Ethiopia, or not having ancestry in the land he was born at.

With no knowledge of where Noah was born or the skin color of his ancestors (again, he probably did not exist), I would say that claim is without merit.
There is no valid reason to believe Noah did not exist. He lived in a region near the Nile which would account for the "flood". The whole world would have appeared to have flooded. He was not Caucasian. He was Black. The area he was born in was populated by Black people.
 
There is no proof Noah did not exist.

That goes both ways.

He lived in a region near the Nile which would account for the "flood"

He was not Caucasian. He was Black.

Conjecture.

The area he was born was populated by Black people.

No one knows where Noah was born, if he was born at all.

Most biblical scholars say he was born in Mesopotamia, which is Iraq. If he was born in Iraq, then his skin color would probably be Caucasian.
 
Last edited:
There is actually wide, scientifically accepted evidence of major flooding at the end of the last ice age. Noah's tale didn't have to occur the day before the story was recorded. Flooding disrupted civilizations all around the Mediterranean and probably elsewhere. Have a little respect for history.

The bible hints that Noah was born in 3000 BC.

If he was born at the end of the Ice Age, like you are suggesting, there would of been no civilization to destroy. The first civilization ever was Jericho, in 9000 BC, which was 11,000 years ago. The last ice age happened over 100,000 years ago.

Don't put on a clown show. You are the one who should have a little respect for history
 
Last edited:
Asclepias does not seem to understand human evolution. Skin color adapted to its present day conditions tens of thousands of years before the start of verbal history.
 
There is actually wide, scientifically accepted evidence of major flooding at the end of the last ice age. Noah's tale didn't have to occur the day before the story was recorded. Flooding disrupted civilizations all around the Mediterranean and probably elsewhere. Have a little respect for history.

The bible actually says that Noah was born in 3000 BC.

If he was born at the end of the Ice Age, like you are suggesting, there would of been no civilization to destroy. The first civilization ever was Jericho, in 9000 BC, which was 11,000 years ago. The last ice age happened over 100,000 years ago.

Don't put on a clown show. You are the one who should have a little respect for history
You just said you didnt believe the bible. You should be consistent.

Pretty sure what you consider civilization is not what they thought was civilization. Humans existed 100k years ago.
 
Asclepias does not seem to understand human evolution. Skin color adapted to its present day conditions tens of thousands of years before the start of verbal history.
I obviously understand better than you. For example I know light skin is only about 10K years in existence and white skin only 7k years in existence in europe.
 

Forum List

Back
Top