Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Make the most of your gloat-fest, Furry! it won't last, Mueller will see to that!
Is A Negative Approval Rating Possible?
No. Zero is the mathematical lower limit of approval.
How can someone be "rejected" when they receive 3 million more votes?You should see a head doctor. Clinton was rejected. That can be proven rather easily. Just do a google search for "current president". You should be sitting down.And we all know just how right those polls were last time huh?
Hillary has a 99 percent chance of winning the election!
Hillary will get over 400 EC votes!
It's not a question of if a landslide but how big a landslide!
Keep your polls. I'll keep Trump! Lmao.
The polls never Clinton had a 99% chance of winning. You just made that percentage up. Many polls showed Hilary and Trump head to head in the polls. And Technically most Americans did vote for Hilary, so they weren't too far off.
Make the most of your gloat-fest, Furry! it won't last, Mueller will see to that!
If Mueller keeps appointing Hillary and Obama sycophants, he will be out of a job so fast your head will spin.
You didn't seem to care when Bill Clinton was castigated by an entire republican congress. However, rest assured that Mueller will not be fired, period.Make the most of your gloat-fest, Furry! it won't last, Mueller will see to that!
If Mueller keeps appointing Hillary and Obama sycophants, he will be out of a job so fast your head will spin.
You should see a head doctor. Clinton was rejected. That can be proven rather easily. Just do a google search for "current president". You should be sitting down.And we all know just how right those polls were last time huh?
Hillary has a 99 percent chance of winning the election!
Hillary will get over 400 EC votes!
It's not a question of if a landslide but how big a landslide!
Keep your polls. I'll keep Trump! Lmao.
The polls never Clinton had a 99% chance of winning. You just made that percentage up. Many polls showed Hilary and Trump head to head in the polls. And Technically most Americans did vote for Hilary, so they weren't too far off.
Trump won by electorate. But majority of voters voted for Hilary. Now of course Hilary lost because we choose presidents based on an outdated electoral system.
But the poster said the polls were wrong. The polls are based on individuals response. Its not based on electoral projections.
Also majority of polls showed that Hilary and Trump both had a chance of winning.
Now of course Hilary lost because we choose presidents based on an outdated electoral system.
However, rest assured that Mueller will not be fired, period.
So, now we have Wyoming an equal to California or Texas? Thats makes about as much sense as your post.You should see a head doctor. Clinton was rejected. That can be proven rather easily. Just do a google search for "current president". You should be sitting down.And we all know just how right those polls were last time huh?
Hillary has a 99 percent chance of winning the election!
Hillary will get over 400 EC votes!
It's not a question of if a landslide but how big a landslide!
Keep your polls. I'll keep Trump! Lmao.
The polls never Clinton had a 99% chance of winning. You just made that percentage up. Many polls showed Hilary and Trump head to head in the polls. And Technically most Americans did vote for Hilary, so they weren't too far off.
Trump won by electorate. But majority of voters voted for Hilary. Now of course Hilary lost because we choose presidents based on an outdated electoral system.
But the poster said the polls were wrong. The polls are based on individuals response. Its not based on electoral projections.
Also majority of polls showed that Hilary and Trump both had a chance of winning.Now of course Hilary lost because we choose presidents based on an outdated electoral system.
Outdated?
it worked just like the FF wanted it to, by preventing populous states from having undue advantage
How can someone be "rejected" when they receive 3 million more votes?You should see a head doctor. Clinton was rejected. That can be proven rather easily. Just do a google search for "current president". You should be sitting down.And we all know just how right those polls were last time huh?
Hillary has a 99 percent chance of winning the election!
Hillary will get over 400 EC votes!
It's not a question of if a landslide but how big a landslide!
Keep your polls. I'll keep Trump! Lmao.
The polls never Clinton had a 99% chance of winning. You just made that percentage up. Many polls showed Hilary and Trump head to head in the polls. And Technically most Americans did vote for Hilary, so they weren't too far off.
So, now we have Wyoming an equal to California or Texas? Thats makes about as much sense as your post.You should see a head doctor. Clinton was rejected. That can be proven rather easily. Just do a google search for "current president". You should be sitting down.And we all know just how right those polls were last time huh?
Hillary has a 99 percent chance of winning the election!
Hillary will get over 400 EC votes!
It's not a question of if a landslide but how big a landslide!
Keep your polls. I'll keep Trump! Lmao.
The polls never Clinton had a 99% chance of winning. You just made that percentage up. Many polls showed Hilary and Trump head to head in the polls. And Technically most Americans did vote for Hilary, so they weren't too far off.
Trump won by electorate. But majority of voters voted for Hilary. Now of course Hilary lost because we choose presidents based on an outdated electoral system.
But the poster said the polls were wrong. The polls are based on individuals response. Its not based on electoral projections.
Also majority of polls showed that Hilary and Trump both had a chance of winning.Now of course Hilary lost because we choose presidents based on an outdated electoral system.
Outdated?
it worked just like the FF wanted it to, by preventing populous states from having undue advantage
before asking this question, you need to look up the real reason for the electoral college instead of the fluff you posted.So, now we have Wyoming an equal to California or Texas? Thats makes about as much sense as your post.You should see a head doctor. Clinton was rejected. That can be proven rather easily. Just do a google search for "current president". You should be sitting down.The polls never Clinton had a 99% chance of winning. You just made that percentage up. Many polls showed Hilary and Trump head to head in the polls. And Technically most Americans did vote for Hilary, so they weren't too far off.
Trump won by electorate. But majority of voters voted for Hilary. Now of course Hilary lost because we choose presidents based on an outdated electoral system.
But the poster said the polls were wrong. The polls are based on individuals response. Its not based on electoral projections.
Also majority of polls showed that Hilary and Trump both had a chance of winning.Now of course Hilary lost because we choose presidents based on an outdated electoral system.
Outdated?
it worked just like the FF wanted it to, by preventing populous states from having undue advantage
another fool ignorant of the EV.
How many EV each does California, Texas, and Wyoming have?
Do you think that posting the same shyte under multiple ID's each day isn't getting boring, honey bunch?These little prog melt down threads are getting boring... one right after another... all the same crap...
So, now we have Wyoming an equal to California or Texas? Thats makes about as much sense as your post.You should see a head doctor. Clinton was rejected. That can be proven rather easily. Just do a google search for "current president". You should be sitting down.And we all know just how right those polls were last time huh?
Hillary has a 99 percent chance of winning the election!
Hillary will get over 400 EC votes!
It's not a question of if a landslide but how big a landslide!
Keep your polls. I'll keep Trump! Lmao.
The polls never Clinton had a 99% chance of winning. You just made that percentage up. Many polls showed Hilary and Trump head to head in the polls. And Technically most Americans did vote for Hilary, so they weren't too far off.
Trump won by electorate. But majority of voters voted for Hilary. Now of course Hilary lost because we choose presidents based on an outdated electoral system.
But the poster said the polls were wrong. The polls are based on individuals response. Its not based on electoral projections.
Also majority of polls showed that Hilary and Trump both had a chance of winning.Now of course Hilary lost because we choose presidents based on an outdated electoral system.
Outdated?
it worked just like the FF wanted it to, by preventing populous states from having undue advantage
You should see a head doctor. Clinton was rejected. That can be proven rather easily. Just do a google search for "current president". You should be sitting down.And we all know just how right those polls were last time huh?
Hillary has a 99 percent chance of winning the election!
Hillary will get over 400 EC votes!
It's not a question of if a landslide but how big a landslide!
Keep your polls. I'll keep Trump! Lmao.
The polls never Clinton had a 99% chance of winning. You just made that percentage up. Many polls showed Hilary and Trump head to head in the polls. And Technically most Americans did vote for Hilary, so they weren't too far off.
Trump won by electorate. But majority of voters voted for Hilary. Now of course Hilary lost because we choose presidents based on an outdated electoral system.
But the poster said the polls were wrong. The polls are based on individuals response. Its not based on electoral projections.
Also majority of polls showed that Hilary and Trump both had a chance of winning.Now of course Hilary lost because we choose presidents based on an outdated electoral system.
Outdated?
it worked just like the FF wanted it to, by preventing populous states from having undue advantage
More reason why the EC is not needed. Thanks sweetie pie, you handlers did a fine job of research.So, now we have Wyoming an equal to California or Texas? Thats makes about as much sense as your post.You should see a head doctor. Clinton was rejected. That can be proven rather easily. Just do a google search for "current president". You should be sitting down.The polls never Clinton had a 99% chance of winning. You just made that percentage up. Many polls showed Hilary and Trump head to head in the polls. And Technically most Americans did vote for Hilary, so they weren't too far off.
Trump won by electorate. But majority of voters voted for Hilary. Now of course Hilary lost because we choose presidents based on an outdated electoral system.
But the poster said the polls were wrong. The polls are based on individuals response. Its not based on electoral projections.
Also majority of polls showed that Hilary and Trump both had a chance of winning.Now of course Hilary lost because we choose presidents based on an outdated electoral system.
Outdated?
it worked just like the FF wanted it to, by preventing populous states from having undue advantage
Wyoming has 3 votes. California has 55 and Texas 38. Only in a lib math book are those numbers equal.
before asking this question, you need to look up the real reason for the electoral college instead of the fluff you posted.So, now we have Wyoming an equal to California or Texas? Thats makes about as much sense as your post.You should see a head doctor. Clinton was rejected. That can be proven rather easily. Just do a google search for "current president". You should be sitting down.
Trump won by electorate. But majority of voters voted for Hilary. Now of course Hilary lost because we choose presidents based on an outdated electoral system.
But the poster said the polls were wrong. The polls are based on individuals response. Its not based on electoral projections.
Also majority of polls showed that Hilary and Trump both had a chance of winning.Now of course Hilary lost because we choose presidents based on an outdated electoral system.
Outdated?
it worked just like the FF wanted it to, by preventing populous states from having undue advantage
another fool ignorant of the EV.
How many EV each does California, Texas, and Wyoming have?
If you can't find it, I will be happy to teach you.
He has multiple IDs?Do you think that posting the same shyte under multiple ID's each day isn't getting boring, honey bunch?These little prog melt down threads are getting boring... one right after another... all the same crap...