Is A Negative Approval Rating Possible?

And we all know just how right those polls were last time huh?
Hillary has a 99 percent chance of winning the election!
Hillary will get over 400 EC votes!
It's not a question of if a landslide but how big a landslide!

Keep your polls. I'll keep Trump! Lmao.

The polls never Clinton had a 99% chance of winning. You just made that percentage up. Many polls showed Hilary and Trump head to head in the polls. And Technically most Americans did vote for Hilary, so they weren't too far off.
You should see a head doctor. Clinton was rejected. That can be proven rather easily. Just do a google search for "current president". You should be sitting down.
How can someone be "rejected" when they receive 3 million more votes?
 
Make the most of your gloat-fest, Furry! it won't last, Mueller will see to that!

If Mueller keeps appointing Hillary and Obama sycophants, he will be out of a job so fast your head will spin.
You didn't seem to care when Bill Clinton was castigated by an entire republican congress. However, rest assured that Mueller will not be fired, period.
 
And we all know just how right those polls were last time huh?
Hillary has a 99 percent chance of winning the election!
Hillary will get over 400 EC votes!
It's not a question of if a landslide but how big a landslide!

Keep your polls. I'll keep Trump! Lmao.

The polls never Clinton had a 99% chance of winning. You just made that percentage up. Many polls showed Hilary and Trump head to head in the polls. And Technically most Americans did vote for Hilary, so they weren't too far off.
You should see a head doctor. Clinton was rejected. That can be proven rather easily. Just do a google search for "current president". You should be sitting down.

Trump won by electorate. But majority of voters voted for Hilary. Now of course Hilary lost because we choose presidents based on an outdated electoral system.

But the poster said the polls were wrong. The polls are based on individuals response. Its not based on electoral projections.

Also majority of polls showed that Hilary and Trump both had a chance of winning.
Now of course Hilary lost because we choose presidents based on an outdated electoral system.

Outdated?

it worked just like the FF wanted it to, by preventing populous states from having undue advantage
 
And we all know just how right those polls were last time huh?
Hillary has a 99 percent chance of winning the election!
Hillary will get over 400 EC votes!
It's not a question of if a landslide but how big a landslide!

Keep your polls. I'll keep Trump! Lmao.

The polls never Clinton had a 99% chance of winning. You just made that percentage up. Many polls showed Hilary and Trump head to head in the polls. And Technically most Americans did vote for Hilary, so they weren't too far off.
You should see a head doctor. Clinton was rejected. That can be proven rather easily. Just do a google search for "current president". You should be sitting down.

Trump won by electorate. But majority of voters voted for Hilary. Now of course Hilary lost because we choose presidents based on an outdated electoral system.

But the poster said the polls were wrong. The polls are based on individuals response. Its not based on electoral projections.

Also majority of polls showed that Hilary and Trump both had a chance of winning.
Now of course Hilary lost because we choose presidents based on an outdated electoral system.

Outdated?

it worked just like the FF wanted it to, by preventing populous states from having undue advantage
So, now we have Wyoming an equal to California or Texas? Thats makes about as much sense as your post.
 
And we all know just how right those polls were last time huh?
Hillary has a 99 percent chance of winning the election!
Hillary will get over 400 EC votes!
It's not a question of if a landslide but how big a landslide!

Keep your polls. I'll keep Trump! Lmao.

The polls never Clinton had a 99% chance of winning. You just made that percentage up. Many polls showed Hilary and Trump head to head in the polls. And Technically most Americans did vote for Hilary, so they weren't too far off.
You should see a head doctor. Clinton was rejected. That can be proven rather easily. Just do a google search for "current president". You should be sitting down.
How can someone be "rejected" when they receive 3 million more votes?

Hillary can run for queen of NY and California. I am sure she will win.

Do libs not study in school and realize that you can be elected President by winning only 13 states?
 
And we all know just how right those polls were last time huh?
Hillary has a 99 percent chance of winning the election!
Hillary will get over 400 EC votes!
It's not a question of if a landslide but how big a landslide!

Keep your polls. I'll keep Trump! Lmao.

The polls never Clinton had a 99% chance of winning. You just made that percentage up. Many polls showed Hilary and Trump head to head in the polls. And Technically most Americans did vote for Hilary, so they weren't too far off.
You should see a head doctor. Clinton was rejected. That can be proven rather easily. Just do a google search for "current president". You should be sitting down.

Trump won by electorate. But majority of voters voted for Hilary. Now of course Hilary lost because we choose presidents based on an outdated electoral system.

But the poster said the polls were wrong. The polls are based on individuals response. Its not based on electoral projections.

Also majority of polls showed that Hilary and Trump both had a chance of winning.
Now of course Hilary lost because we choose presidents based on an outdated electoral system.

Outdated?

it worked just like the FF wanted it to, by preventing populous states from having undue advantage
So, now we have Wyoming an equal to California or Texas? Thats makes about as much sense as your post.

another fool ignorant of the EV.

How many EV each does California, Texas, and Wyoming have?
 
The polls never Clinton had a 99% chance of winning. You just made that percentage up. Many polls showed Hilary and Trump head to head in the polls. And Technically most Americans did vote for Hilary, so they weren't too far off.
You should see a head doctor. Clinton was rejected. That can be proven rather easily. Just do a google search for "current president". You should be sitting down.

Trump won by electorate. But majority of voters voted for Hilary. Now of course Hilary lost because we choose presidents based on an outdated electoral system.

But the poster said the polls were wrong. The polls are based on individuals response. Its not based on electoral projections.

Also majority of polls showed that Hilary and Trump both had a chance of winning.
Now of course Hilary lost because we choose presidents based on an outdated electoral system.

Outdated?

it worked just like the FF wanted it to, by preventing populous states from having undue advantage
So, now we have Wyoming an equal to California or Texas? Thats makes about as much sense as your post.

another fool ignorant of the EV.

How many EV each does California, Texas, and Wyoming have?
before asking this question, you need to look up the real reason for the electoral college instead of the fluff you posted.
If you can't find it, I will be happy to teach you.
 
These little prog melt down threads are getting boring... one right after another... all the same crap...
 
These little prog melt down threads are getting boring... one right after another... all the same crap...
Do you think that posting the same shyte under multiple ID's each day isn't getting boring, honey bunch?
 
And we all know just how right those polls were last time huh?
Hillary has a 99 percent chance of winning the election!
Hillary will get over 400 EC votes!
It's not a question of if a landslide but how big a landslide!

Keep your polls. I'll keep Trump! Lmao.

The polls never Clinton had a 99% chance of winning. You just made that percentage up. Many polls showed Hilary and Trump head to head in the polls. And Technically most Americans did vote for Hilary, so they weren't too far off.
You should see a head doctor. Clinton was rejected. That can be proven rather easily. Just do a google search for "current president". You should be sitting down.

Trump won by electorate. But majority of voters voted for Hilary. Now of course Hilary lost because we choose presidents based on an outdated electoral system.

But the poster said the polls were wrong. The polls are based on individuals response. Its not based on electoral projections.

Also majority of polls showed that Hilary and Trump both had a chance of winning.
Now of course Hilary lost because we choose presidents based on an outdated electoral system.

Outdated?

it worked just like the FF wanted it to, by preventing populous states from having undue advantage
So, now we have Wyoming an equal to California or Texas? Thats makes about as much sense as your post.

Wyoming has 3 votes. California has 55 and Texas 38. Only in a lib math book are those numbers equal.
 
And we all know just how right those polls were last time huh?
Hillary has a 99 percent chance of winning the election!
Hillary will get over 400 EC votes!
It's not a question of if a landslide but how big a landslide!

Keep your polls. I'll keep Trump! Lmao.

The polls never Clinton had a 99% chance of winning. You just made that percentage up. Many polls showed Hilary and Trump head to head in the polls. And Technically most Americans did vote for Hilary, so they weren't too far off.
You should see a head doctor. Clinton was rejected. That can be proven rather easily. Just do a google search for "current president". You should be sitting down.

Trump won by electorate. But majority of voters voted for Hilary. Now of course Hilary lost because we choose presidents based on an outdated electoral system.

But the poster said the polls were wrong. The polls are based on individuals response. Its not based on electoral projections.

Also majority of polls showed that Hilary and Trump both had a chance of winning.
Now of course Hilary lost because we choose presidents based on an outdated electoral system.

Outdated?

it worked just like the FF wanted it to, by preventing populous states from having undue advantage

Yes, outdated. Every other country on Earth that has free elections, elects their leaders based on thr majority. That's what democracy is supposes to be about. Freaking 3rd world countries in Asia know.

Why are we still leaving in the 1800s.

Majority rules.

If it wasn't for the EC, Bush would have never been elected into office and Agent Orange wouldn't be in office as well.
 
The polls never Clinton had a 99% chance of winning. You just made that percentage up. Many polls showed Hilary and Trump head to head in the polls. And Technically most Americans did vote for Hilary, so they weren't too far off.
You should see a head doctor. Clinton was rejected. That can be proven rather easily. Just do a google search for "current president". You should be sitting down.

Trump won by electorate. But majority of voters voted for Hilary. Now of course Hilary lost because we choose presidents based on an outdated electoral system.

But the poster said the polls were wrong. The polls are based on individuals response. Its not based on electoral projections.

Also majority of polls showed that Hilary and Trump both had a chance of winning.
Now of course Hilary lost because we choose presidents based on an outdated electoral system.

Outdated?

it worked just like the FF wanted it to, by preventing populous states from having undue advantage
So, now we have Wyoming an equal to California or Texas? Thats makes about as much sense as your post.

Wyoming has 3 votes. California has 55 and Texas 38. Only in a lib math book are those numbers equal.
More reason why the EC is not needed. Thanks sweetie pie, you handlers did a fine job of research.
 
You should see a head doctor. Clinton was rejected. That can be proven rather easily. Just do a google search for "current president". You should be sitting down.

Trump won by electorate. But majority of voters voted for Hilary. Now of course Hilary lost because we choose presidents based on an outdated electoral system.

But the poster said the polls were wrong. The polls are based on individuals response. Its not based on electoral projections.

Also majority of polls showed that Hilary and Trump both had a chance of winning.
Now of course Hilary lost because we choose presidents based on an outdated electoral system.

Outdated?

it worked just like the FF wanted it to, by preventing populous states from having undue advantage
So, now we have Wyoming an equal to California or Texas? Thats makes about as much sense as your post.

another fool ignorant of the EV.

How many EV each does California, Texas, and Wyoming have?
before asking this question, you need to look up the real reason for the electoral college instead of the fluff you posted.
If you can't find it, I will be happy to teach you.

Go ahead and try to teach me, since that is what I do for a living!
 

Forum List

Back
Top