No they do not. Unemployment is rising. Real unemployment is higher than the 4% you see.Sure you do.
Deport and cancel all sanctuary cities
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No they do not. Unemployment is rising. Real unemployment is higher than the 4% you see.Sure you do.
Real unemployment rate is higher than 4%Sure you do.
The lack of housing stems from the lack of housing construction. Know what's a huge impediment to housing construction? Labor costs in building trades.The consequences is fewer illegals so we don’t need as many police officers, more housing opens up for actual Americans and Americans or those with work visas do the actual jobs. Imagine that!?
Then explain, without the far Left looniness, why we have such an explosion of homelessness?Our people already have jobs. What, do you want everyone working two jobs now?
"Real" unemployment is whatever you say it is?No they do not. Unemployment is rising. Real unemployment is higher than the 4% you see.
Deport and cancel all sanctuary cities
It's what the BLS says, dumbass. And it is far higher than 4%. But again, you're an open borders scumbag."Real" unemployment is whatever you say it is?
4.2% isn't far higher than 4%.It's what the BLS says, dumbass. And it is far higher than 4%. But again, you're an open borders scumbag.
I am talking about bills that were for the overall benefit of the nation and that NORMALLY both parties would support but just because Obama (a Black man) was president, the did not pass them. Here is one example:Your wrong sided opinion is just that-wrong! It is NOT the GOP's job to rubberstamp the Leftist agenda. And that's what the vast majority of disagreement with the Chicago Thug stems.
Go fuck yourself. The Ovomit years were the worse for the country.I am talking about bills that were for the overall benefit of the nation and that NORMALLY both parties would support but just because Obama (a Black man) was president, the did not pass them. Here is one example:
Even though the economy was in free fall because of the recession brought on by Bush Jr, not one House Republican voted for the effort to revive the Emergency Stimulus Bill, prompting a wave of punditry about a failed party refusing to help clean up its own mess and dooming itself to irrelevance.
and this is just ONE example of how the Republicans refused to work WITH Obama on anything.
Now, it is your turn to try to prove me wrong. By the way, words will not win the argument. You have to give me data to win.
You still haven't explained the explosion of panhandlers and bums on the streets. But then again, you would rather grant rights to wetback beaners who come here without doing it the right and proper way.4.2% isn't far higher than 4%.
Thanks for proving the OP correct. You are definitely of one Trump blind-by-choice cult members. As everyone of the Trumpers do, you insult debase and run away because you cannot prove the data, statistics and facts given are wrong. As such, you attack the messenger. It is such a cult-group thing to do and considering the cult has over 30 million members (minions) in it, it does become tiresome to hear it so much. It is much like the same incompetent and tiresome "I am being attacked" rants that Trump does.Go fuck yourself. The Ovomit years were the worse for the country.
Your cute little word salad here doesnt change a thing. What I said in Post # 2985 and before, that stands 100% intact. Obama ended his reign with 2 years of awful declining GDPs (aka recessions). Trump brought those low GDPs back up again.First of all, your statement was that "Trump was the best president ever" and yet your reply talks about Obama. Obama did have problems from the very start because he never had the House and the Senate in his favor and his color also prevented many Whites from ever doing anything he suggested. As such, Obama's economy numbers were not great either. On top of that, he inherited a recession, which also prevented his numbers from being great.
But when you go back 50 years, neither Obama nor Trump can compare with other presidents. In fact, Democrat Clinton had triple the success with the economy than Trump did.
As such, your statement (and this reply of yours), means you are living in a fantasy world.
Facts do not support your views. I will say in your favor that Carter was a bad president so there you are right but then again Bush Jr was almost as bad, for example.
I would much rather have had a Condi Rice, Allen West or another prominent Conservative black. Obama is nothing but an urban hoodrat scumbag.
One question. Why don't you ALL get together and go away and make another nation for yourselves where you can do what you want and get the benefits and suffer the consequences of your beliefs...............like for instance, no immigrants, which in turn means no one tilling the fields, no one working in construction, and no one doing service. Wouldn't that work for you?
MIS"education"..........aka indoctrination.Obama is more intelligent and has more education than you.
Your post makes things totally clear. Trumpers (like you and like Vance) will cherry pick things to fit your narrative and leave the full truth unstated.Your cute little word salad here doesnt change a thing. What I said in Post # 2985 and before, that stands 100% intact. Obama ended his reign with 2 years of awful declining GDPs (aka recessions). Trump brought those low GDPs back up again.
Even after the Democrat pandemic, Trump brought us back up again (2020 Q3) with the best GDP quarter in US history (34.8%), that no president (including) Clinton ever came close to equalling.
Regarding your silly race card, I don't see how his color or his racist attitudes prevented whites from doing anything, othr than getting into colleges, getting financial aid, getting hired to jobs, and getting promoted in jobs. The VA hospital that I go to quite often, with 16,000 employees is a testament to Obama's affirmative action racism. In 2009, the employee identity was about 50% non-white and 50% white.
Now, it is about 90% non-white.
Perhaps the worst aspect of obama's anti-2hite racism however show he, Al Sharpton, and Etic Holder went around to cities threatening mayors with DOJ lawsuits, if they did not have their police stand down during riots. This was the undercurrent of the 2014 riots in Ferguson, MO, that we all watched live on TV, with rioters looting and committing arson, and everybody was saying >>>> "Where are the police ? Why arent they stopping this ?" They could have, if not for Obama's intimidation & coercion.
The following year, when Baltimore erupted in rioting, Obama sent running dog Al Sharpton to talk to the mayor (Stephanie Rawlings).
The aftermath of that was protesters running amok and throwing rocks & bottles at police who took no action against them and did nothing but move backwards, covering themselves with shields. Whn asked about the amazing police inaction, Rawlings made this stunning remark >>
"I made it very clear that I work with the police and instructed them to do everything that they could to make sure that the protesters were able to exercise their right to free speech. It's a very delicate balancing act. Because while we try to make sure that they were protected from the cars and other things that were going on, we also gave those who wished to destroy, space to do that as well."
![]()
Baltimore Mayor: 'Gave Those Who Wished to Destroy Space to Do That'
After days of peaceful protests in honor of the 25-year-old black West Baltimore man who died in police custody on April 19, demonstrations took a violent turn in Baltimore Saturday.www.cbsnews.com
View attachment 1015204
"You want me to do WHAT ?"![]()
"What she is saying within this statement was that there was an effort to give the peaceful demonstrators room to conduct their peaceful protests on Saturday. Unfortunately, as a result of providing the peaceful demonstrators with the space to share their message, that also meant that those seeking to incite violence also had the space to operate. The police sought to balance the rights of the peaceful demonstrators against the need to step in against those who were seeking to create violence.
The mayor is not saying that she asked police to give space to people who sought to create violence. Any suggestion otherwise would be a misinterpretation of her statement."
Leave it toa liberal to TRY to whitewash their dirty laundry. You think i havent heard that doubletalk whitewash before. We knpw what they said. We also know quite clearly what she said, and another of your silly word salads doesnt change a thing.Your post makes things totally clear. Trumpers (like you and like Vance) will cherry pick things to fit your narrative and leave the full truth unstated.
Let me show you exactly what I mean. This link you gave, shows that the "mayor gave those that wished to destroy space to do that".
The reality is that her statement was misconstrued and what you think she said is NOT what she meant. She just did not word her statement exactly as it should have been worded.
Here and FROM YOUR OWN LINK, is what she meant
On Monday, the mayor's office sent out clarification for Rawlings-Blake's statement:
It was not "space to destroy", but space to the peaceful protestors to share their message.
Once again, you prove my OP. Trumpers see things as they WANT to see them and not as what they truly are.