candycorn
Diamond Member
Quote pleaseAre you actually telling me you have never heard that said?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Quote pleaseAre you actually telling me you have never heard that said?
When does believing something that has a the lack of convincing evidence become intellectually dishonest?You cannot examine evidence that has been destroyed and/or was never provided or otherwise compromised. So it is not intellectually dishonest to wonder what the outcome would have been had everybody been 100% ethical and wanted the American voters to be confident the election was honest and on the up and up.
I've only heard it when the Right accuses the Left of saying it.Are you actually telling me you have never heard that said?
Intellectual honesty can be applied in politics or in partisan issues but it certainly is not confined to that.I will stand by my definition.
Intellectual honesty can be applied in politics or in partisan issues but it certainly is not confined to that.
So the definition you pulled off the internet as the first thing Google showed you is incomplete and probably intellectually dishonest in itself implying that it only applies to problem solving with the implication that partisanship is a factor in it.
Maybe the person who wrote that believed it and was not being intellectually dishonest. But few Google or 'woke' inspired definitions are really accurate these days.