...'Insurrection' on J6 = the real deal ....

[Chillicothe]

As we all have seen on this venue there is a segment (growing ever smaller, btw) ...but a faction of posters here who will not admit---yet ----that the violent attempt to stop the Constitutionally mandated peaceful-transfer-of-power was, in fact, an insurrection.

Yeah, their view conflicts with both the colloquial understanding of the word, and the statutory definition.

But their hesitancy no longer matters all that much. Their view has been fading for some time now. But yesterday, a nail on the issue was firmly pounded into place.

A DC trial court, in passing judgement (and a sentence - 68 months) clearly and unambiguously stated in open court, on the record.....that the January 6th attempted insurrection WAS......in fact, an insurrection.
Here are the court's statements as reported in Politico: (my avatar has bolded the word 'insurrection' as emphasis)
-------------------------

"Jan. 6 defendant who sprayed line of police sentenced after tearful apology​

“You’re entitled to your political views but not to an insurrection," the judge said before delivering 68-month jail term.
----------------------------------------------------
By KYLE CHENEY -- Politico 02/01/2023 04:55 PM EST

"A Jan. 6 defendant who sprayed a chemical irritant at about 15 police officers — and later bragged about it in a video interview — was sentenced Wednesday to 68 months in prison. This is one of the stiffest Jan. 6 sentences handed down to date.

Daniel Caldwell, a 51-year-old Marine Corps veteran, delivered a tearful apology in court to the officers he sprayed, expressing remorse for his actions that day and pleading with U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly for mercy.
But Kollar-Kotelly repeatedly described Caldwell as an “insurrectionist” and noted that his deployment of chemical spray at officers created such an intense cloud that it nearly broke the depleted police line by itself.
“You’re entitled to your political views but not to an insurrection,” the judge said. “You were an insurrectionist.”

Kollar-Kotelly also put his involvement in the broader Jan. 6 attack in the context of previous challenges to the United States government. She said it was crucial for her sentence to “fortify against the revolutionary fervor that you and others felt on Jan. 6 and may still feel today.”

“Insurrection is not,” she said, “and cannot ever be warranted.”

 

[johngaltshrugged]

You bed wetters are so funny.
A bunch of unarmed people are invited inside the Capitol & you are still soiling your sheets with your stupid "insurrection" BS.

I just laugh at the obvious gaslighting attempts from you progponces & fembots that get confused when entering a bathroom

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

You bed wetters are so funny.

You compulsive lying Cultists aren't so funny

 

[TNHarley]

An insurrectionist not charged with insurrection.
Wow, amazing how he dodged that. Unlike all the others charged with insurrection.

 

[SeaMajor7]

As we all have seen on this venue there is a segment (growing ever smaller, btw) ...but a faction of posters here who will not admit---yet ----that the violent attempt to stop the Constitutionally mandated peaceful-transfer-of-power was, in fact, an insurrection.

Yeah, their view conflicts with both the colloquial understanding of the word, and the statutory definition.

But their hesitancy no longer matters all that much. Their view has been fading for some time now. But yesterday, a nail on the issue was firmly pounded into place.

A DC trial court, in passing judgement (and a sentence - 68 months) clearly and unambiguously stated in open court, on the record.....that the January 6th attempted insurrection WAS......in fact, an insurrection.
Here are the court's statements as reported in Politico: (my avatar has bolded the word 'insurrection' as emphasis)
-------------------------

"Jan. 6 defendant who sprayed line of police sentenced after tearful apology​

“You’re entitled to your political views but not to an insurrection," the judge said before delivering 68-month jail term.
----------------------------------------------------
By KYLE CHENEY -- Politico 02/01/2023 04:55 PM EST

"A Jan. 6 defendant who sprayed a chemical irritant at about 15 police officers — and later bragged about it in a video interview — was sentenced Wednesday to 68 months in prison. This is one of the stiffest Jan. 6 sentences handed down to date.

Daniel Caldwell, a 51-year-old Marine Corps veteran, delivered a tearful apology in court to the officers he sprayed, expressing remorse for his actions that day and pleading with U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly for mercy.
But Kollar-Kotelly repeatedly described Caldwell as an “insurrectionist” and noted that his deployment of chemical spray at officers created such an intense cloud that it nearly broke the depleted police line by itself.
“You’re entitled to your political views but not to an insurrection,” the judge said. “You were an insurrectionist.”

Kollar-Kotelly also put his involvement in the broader Jan. 6 attack in the context of previous challenges to the United States government. She said it was crucial for her sentence to “fortify against the revolutionary fervor that you and others felt on Jan. 6 and may still feel today.”

“Insurrection is not,” she said, “and cannot ever be warranted.”

Why were they let in, and who gave the orders?

 

[Concerned American]

As we all have seen on this venue there is a segment (growing ever smaller, btw) ...but a faction of posters here who will not admit---yet ----that the violent attempt to stop the Constitutionally mandated peaceful-transfer-of-power was, in fact, an insurrection.

Yeah, their view conflicts with both the colloquial understanding of the word, and the statutory definition.

But their hesitancy no longer matters all that much. Their view has been fading for some time now. But yesterday, a nail on the issue was firmly pounded into place.

A DC trial court, in passing judgement (and a sentence - 68 months) clearly and unambiguously stated in open court, on the record.....that the January 6th attempted insurrection WAS......in fact, an insurrection.
Here are the court's statements as reported in Politico: (my avatar has bolded the word 'insurrection' as emphasis)
-------------------------

"Jan. 6 defendant who sprayed line of police sentenced after tearful apology​

“You’re entitled to your political views but not to an insurrection," the judge said before delivering 68-month jail term.
----------------------------------------------------
By KYLE CHENEY -- Politico 02/01/2023 04:55 PM EST

"A Jan. 6 defendant who sprayed a chemical irritant at about 15 police officers — and later bragged about it in a video interview — was sentenced Wednesday to 68 months in prison. This is one of the stiffest Jan. 6 sentences handed down to date.

Daniel Caldwell, a 51-year-old Marine Corps veteran, delivered a tearful apology in court to the officers he sprayed, expressing remorse for his actions that day and pleading with U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly for mercy.
But Kollar-Kotelly repeatedly described Caldwell as an “insurrectionist” and noted that his deployment of chemical spray at officers created such an intense cloud that it nearly broke the depleted police line by itself.
“You’re entitled to your political views but not to an insurrection,” the judge said. “You were an insurrectionist.”

Kollar-Kotelly also put his involvement in the broader Jan. 6 attack in the context of previous challenges to the United States government. She said it was crucial for her sentence to “fortify against the revolutionary fervor that you and others felt on Jan. 6 and may still feel today.”

“Insurrection is not,” she said, “and cannot ever be warranted.”

Liberal judge moron. They can't define what a woman is either. Bottom line, there can be no insurrection without anyone being charged with that crime--PERIOD. Whine and cry and kick the slats out of your crib all you want. There was no insurrection. It was a riot--just like the ones that BLM/Antifa carried out--but not nearly as long or costly.

 

[Donald H]

As we all have seen on this venue there is a segment (growing ever smaller, btw) ...but a faction of posters here who will not admit---yet ----that the violent attempt to stop the Constitutionally mandated peaceful-transfer-of-power was, in fact, an insurrection.

Yeah, their view conflicts with both the colloquial understanding of the word, and the statutory definition.

But their hesitancy no longer matters all that much. Their view has been fading for some time now. But yesterday, a nail on the issue was firmly pounded into place.

A DC trial court, in passing judgement (and a sentence - 68 months) clearly and unambiguously stated in open court, on the record.....that the January 6th attempted insurrection WAS......in fact, an insurrection.
Here are the court's statements as reported in Politico: (my avatar has bolded the word 'insurrection' as emphasis)
-------------------------

"Jan. 6 defendant who sprayed line of police sentenced after tearful apology​

“You’re entitled to your political views but not to an insurrection," the judge said before delivering 68-month jail term.
----------------------------------------------------
By KYLE CHENEY -- Politico 02/01/2023 04:55 PM EST

"A Jan. 6 defendant who sprayed a chemical irritant at about 15 police officers — and later bragged about it in a video interview — was sentenced Wednesday to 68 months in prison. This is one of the stiffest Jan. 6 sentences handed down to date.

Daniel Caldwell, a 51-year-old Marine Corps veteran, delivered a tearful apology in court to the officers he sprayed, expressing remorse for his actions that day and pleading with U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly for mercy.
But Kollar-Kotelly repeatedly described Caldwell as an “insurrectionist” and noted that his deployment of chemical spray at officers created such an intense cloud that it nearly broke the depleted police line by itself.
“You’re entitled to your political views but not to an insurrection,” the judge said. “You were an insurrectionist.”

Kollar-Kotelly also put his involvement in the broader Jan. 6 attack in the context of previous challenges to the United States government. She said it was crucial for her sentence to “fortify against the revolutionary fervor that you and others felt on Jan. 6 and may still feel today.”

“Insurrection is not,” she said, “and cannot ever be warranted.”

The penalty isn't harsh enough to suit the crime.
In this case they engaged in crimes against their country that would warrant the death penalty.

The uncomfortable question to ask is: Why have the courts been so lenient?
Is there a suspicion that Trump could rally his troops and then the majority of the country would rally behind him?W
We can at least understand that there's hesitancy to move against Trump still, and the DOJ needs to continue to build negativity against Trump before it's in a safe position to take him down.

 

[johngaltshrugged]

You compulsive lying Cultists aren't so funny

Too bad because I love to laugh at you low-T progponcers & your constant dance of cowardly shame whenever the piper plays your new conditioning tune.
It won't be long before they try to sick you all on people like me because that's coming.
It's what totalitarians do to silence dissent but you neo-brownshirts will all run like little girls when we stop taking your crap.

 

[Doug1943]

Let us ask our Leftist friends: were the AntiFa/BLM riots of the summer of 2020 "insurrections"?

 

[g5000]

As we all have seen on this venue there is a segment (growing ever smaller, btw) ...but a faction of posters here who will not admit---yet ----that the violent attempt to stop the Constitutionally mandated peaceful-transfer-of-power was, in fact, an insurrection.

Yeah, their view conflicts with both the colloquial understanding of the word, and the statutory definition.

But their hesitancy no longer matters all that much. Their view has been fading for some time now. But yesterday, a nail on the issue was firmly pounded into place.

A DC trial court, in passing judgement (and a sentence - 68 months) clearly and unambiguously stated in open court, on the record.....that the January 6th attempted insurrection WAS......in fact, an insurrection.
Here are the court's statements as reported in Politico: (my avatar has bolded the word 'insurrection' as emphasis)
-------------------------

"Jan. 6 defendant who sprayed line of police sentenced after tearful apology​

“You’re entitled to your political views but not to an insurrection," the judge said before delivering 68-month jail term.
----------------------------------------------------
By KYLE CHENEY -- Politico 02/01/2023 04:55 PM EST

"A Jan. 6 defendant who sprayed a chemical irritant at about 15 police officers — and later bragged about it in a video interview — was sentenced Wednesday to 68 months in prison. This is one of the stiffest Jan. 6 sentences handed down to date.

Daniel Caldwell, a 51-year-old Marine Corps veteran, delivered a tearful apology in court to the officers he sprayed, expressing remorse for his actions that day and pleading with U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly for mercy.
But Kollar-Kotelly repeatedly described Caldwell as an “insurrectionist” and noted that his deployment of chemical spray at officers created such an intense cloud that it nearly broke the depleted police line by itself.
“You’re entitled to your political views but not to an insurrection,” the judge said. “You were an insurrectionist.”

Kollar-Kotelly also put his involvement in the broader Jan. 6 attack in the context of previous challenges to the United States government. She said it was crucial for her sentence to “fortify against the revolutionary fervor that you and others felt on Jan. 6 and may still feel today.”

“Insurrection is not,” she said, “and cannot ever be warranted.”

B-b-b-b-b-but they were just trespassing!

 

[Magnus]

Liberal judge moron. They can't define what a woman is either. Bottom line, there can be no insurrection without anyone being charged with that crime--PERIOD. Whine and cry and kick the slats out of your crib all you want. There was no insurrection. It was a riot--just like the ones that BLM/Antifa carried out--but not nearly as long or costly.

Yup. First appointed to the bench by a liberal president...

On October 3, 1984, Kollar-Kotelly was nominated as an Associate Judge of the Superior Court of the District of Columbia by President Ronald Reagan; she took her oath of office on October 21. She served as Deputy Presiding Judge of the Criminal Division from 1997 to 1997.

 

[Donald H]

Let us ask our Leftist friends: were the AntiFa/BLM riots of the summer of 2020 "insurrections"?

Definitely not, by definition.

 

[whitehall]

Mom and pop demonstrators who might be guilty of criminal trespass are treated like terrorists. A federal Cop with a history of mishandling firearms shot and killed an unarmed woman who posed no threat.

 

[westwall]

You compulsive lying Cultists aren't so funny

No guns, no insurrection, soi boi....

 

[playtime]

Mom and pop demonstrators who might be guilty of criminal trespass are treated like terrorists.

ne'eh ... most were charged with tresspassing. the terrorists are treated like terrorists because welll.... the shoe fits like a glove.

A federal Cop with a history of mishandling firearms

^^^ complete bullshit ^^^

shot and killed an unarmed woman who posed no threat.

more complete bullshit. being trained in security detail when she was in the military, babbott knew the moment she stepped inside the capital she was risking her life. the hero that gave that bitch her darwin award had no idea if she was armed or even had a bomb strapped to her - given the rabid behavior the mob she was with was showing.

 

[playtime]

An insurrectionist not charged with insurrection.
Wow, amazing how he dodged that. Unlike all the others charged with insurrection.

several have been found guilty of seditious conspiracy-which is the same as being an insurrectionist will be looking at a sentence of 20 years & a hefty fine on each count.

 

[playtime]

Why were they let in, and who gave the orders?

SOME were 'let in ' because SOME of the capital police were trump humpers. others were outnumbered by the sheer number of flying monkeys pushing their way towards the entrances.

& some of donny's boots testified under oath that theye were following donny's orders to go to the capital & fight or they wouldn't have a country any more.

 

[Billiejeens]

Why were they let in, and who gave the orders?

To stop debate on the floor regarding fraud.
Scaffold commander.
Who was the ultimate order giver.
BIA points to Pelosi.

 

[Concerned American]

seditious conspiracy-which is the same as being an insurrectionist

Nope. Use a dictionary instead of spewing a bunch of ignorant shit.

 

[Billiejeens]

SOME were 'let in ' because SOME of the capital police were trump humpers. others were outnumbered by the sheer number of flying monkeys pushing their way towards the entrances.

& some of donny's boots testified under oath that theye were following donny's orders to go to the capital & fight or they wouldn't have a country any more.

None of that is actually true, of course.