Let's take a look at that bolded sentence.. "Which there are not fossils of either." This is why it's called, "A THEORY."
First if you are going to quote me, put in the actual quote, not just part of it. You really seemed to be confuserd. You show a picture asking why there are not millions of fossils of creatures that are from the evolutionary process of man. Steven-R then presented you with the reason as to why there are not millions of fossils of anything. Instead of acknowleging his point you blurt out "you have nothing as your so called proof as to why only the Chimp and man exist and no record of any fossil exists to prove otherwise" is ridiculous. It was also pointed out to you that the first animal is not a chimp but an early anscestor. There are fossils of all the animals in the picture except man because Homo Sapiens have not been on earth long enough to have their bones fossilize. Can you comprehend this? Also a scientific "theory has a different meaning than the other theory.
A scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world that is acquired through the scientific method, and repeatedly confirmed through observation and experimentation. :
I hope you don't feel the same about the theory of gravity. That it is only a theory.