If you can't comprehend God then you can't comprehend heaven either."A man's reach should exceed his grasp, Or what's a heaven for?"
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If you can't comprehend God then you can't comprehend heaven either."A man's reach should exceed his grasp, Or what's a heaven for?"
So you can't look at the evolution of space and time and conclude that our purpose is to evolve and pass it down?As Kurt Vonnegut was wont to ask, "What are people for?"What is our purpose here?
I imagine there are folks who will contrive a number of answers that suit them.
I don't have any.
Then you can't believe the quote you posted, right?Correct. I can only acknowledge the concept of both.If you can't comprehend God then you can't comprehend heaven either.
"A man's reach should exceed his grasp, Or what's a heaven for?"
Ah, a settler, not a pioneer.As Kurt Vonnegut was wont to ask, "What are people for?"
I imagine there are folks who will contrive a number of answers that suit them.
I don't have any.
I didn't say you did. I am merely pointing out the incongruity of implying what heaven is for when it is all incomprehensible to you.I have not expressed disbelief in gods, in heavens, or in any such concepts.The you can't believe the quote you posted, right?
"A man's reach should exceed his grasp, Or what's a heaven for?"
For starters it defines purpose. Purpose is powerful. As a rule a man with purpose is more likely to accomplish things than a man with no purpose. Secondly it defines obligations; an obligation to evolve as a human being and a duty to pass down that wisdom to the next generation.I could, of course, but where would that lead eventually for all living things?So you can't look at the evolution of space and time and conclude that our purpose is to evolve and pass it down?
Just curious... do you really concern yourself with all living things? What would that look like in actuality? My point here is that our immediate concern should be to progress ourselves into becoming the best versions of ourselves. Because then the concern for other living beings - that we actually do come into contact with - will work itself out for their betterment organically, wouldn't you agree?I could, of course, but where would that lead eventually for all living things?So you can't look at the evolution of space and time and conclude that our purpose is to evolve and pass it down?
Why do godless libs care?Does God exist?
Yes and no.
God is not constrained by existence one way or the other.
No one can impose existence upon God, or deprive God of it.
God is none, or one, or many.
Or all simultaneously.
Or not.
That is what it means to be God.
If you insist God exists, God does not exist.
If you insist God does not exist, God exists.
God does that to remind you that you are not God.
It takes one to know one.
It's way above your pay grade.
"DO I BELIEVE HUMANS EXIST?WHAT ARE THEY FOR?"
Whether your "godless libs" care or why is entirely your business.Why do godless libs care?
you dont believe
isnt that enough for you?
I subscribe to Darwin's view of biological evolution: "There is grandeur in this view of life, with its several powers, having been originally breathed by the Creator into a few forms or into one; and that, whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been and are being evolved,” the "Creator" being beyond our comprehension, but creation within our capacity for awe.Just curious... do you really concern yourself with all living things? What would that look like in actuality? My point here is that our immediate concern should be to progress ourselves into becoming the best versions of ourselves. Because then the concern for other living beings - that we actually do come into contact with - will work itself out for their betterment organically, wouldn't you agree?
No one should settle for being mere.Merely a wayfarer passing through, and enjoying the journey.
Does God exist?
Yes and no.
God is not constrained by existence one way or the other.
No one can impose existence upon God, or deprive God of it.
God is none, or one, or many.
Or all simultaneously.
Or not.
That is what it means to be God.
If you insist God exists, God does not exist.
If you insist God does not exist, God exists.
God does that to remind you that you are not God.
It takes one to know one.
It's way above your pay grade.
"DO I BELIEVE HUMANS EXIST?WHAT ARE THEY FOR?"
You have a million bucks I could use, I'll pay you back in the afterlife.If that is how you regard god, that is your right.So, essentially, God is the perfect con.
I couldn't possibly comment.