You might actually see this sort of news.
"Looks Like Trump Was Right About The Coronavirus Fatality Rate
Two new studies suggest that President Trump was right in early March when he guessed the fatality rate for coronavirus is under 1 percent.
APRIL 23, 2020 By
David Marcus
In early March, President Donald Trump was lambasted for saying on Sean Hannityās Fox News show that he had a hunch the coronavirus fatality rate, which the World Health Organization pegged then at 3 to 4 percent, was in fact much lower, under 1 percent.
...as many as 2.7 million people statewide have had the coronavirus. That along with the just over 15,000 deaths that have occurred leads to a fatality rate for the virus of .5 percent according to Gov. Andrew Cuomo.
Here is what Trump said on March 4:
āWell, I think the 3.4 percent is really a false number. Now, and this is just my hunch, and ā but based on a lot of conversations with a lot of people that do this. Because a lot people will have this and itās very mild. Theyāll get better very rapidly. They donāt even see a doctor. They donāt even call a doctor.ā
He went on to say:
āI think that that number (the WHO number) is very high. I think the number, personally, I would say the number is way under 1 percent.ā
Democrats and media pundits blasted Trump for spreading āmisinformation.ā
Two new studies suggest that President Trump was right in early March when he guessed the fatality rate for coronavirus is under 1 percent.
thefederalist.com
On the other hand,....appears that Hillary will win.....
October 25, 2016...
NYTimes gave Hillary 93% chance of winning the election.
2016 Election Forecast: Who Will Be President?
1% of the American people is 3,280,000 people. If, as predicted, half of the American people get the virus, that's 1,640,000 deaths from the virus. Some areas of the country are showing an infection rate of 10% already, and even at 10% infection rate, that's over 300,000 deaths.
What exactly are you celebrating here?
" If, as predicted, half of the American people get the virus, that's 1,640,000 deaths from the virus. "
No it isn't.
No one knows how many actually died/die from the coronavirus.
You've been lied to....nothing new.....but you imbibe it like mother's milk, 'cause you're a moron.
Every death is being attrubuted to the Chinese virus.
āThe underlying cause depends upon what and where conditions are reported on the death certificate. However, the rules for coding and selection of the underlying cause of death are expected to result in COVID- 19 being the underlying cause more often than not,ā the guidelines read.
āCOVID-19 should be reported on the death certificate for all decedents where the disease caused or is assumed to have caused or contributed to death. Certifiers should include as much detail as possible based on their knowledge of the case, medical records, laboratory testing, etc.,ā the guidance continued.
āIf the decedent had other chronic conditions such as COPD or asthma that may have also contributed, these conditions can be reported in Part II.ā
Is The Number of Deaths Due To COVID-19 Being Inflated, And, If So, Why? | NewsRadio 740 KTRH | Michael Berry
As we have yet to reach the total death rate reported in 2019 for the same time period (January 1st and April 9th), it appears that there is something seriously wrong with the way this pandemic has been reported and handled by the medical community, the media, and the politicians.
Pathetically, it most likely isnāt going to get better when as of April 8, 2020,
all patients with coronavirus are now being classified as āDeath due to COVID-19,ā regardless of the real cause of death. This draconian method of manipulating data to conform to your hypothesis is pure evil. It allows the medical community, the media, and politicians to cover up their errors, distort their miscalculations, and falsify their reports so that they can justify even further measures that will attempt to control, manipulate, and profit from those who donāt understand the importance of āstatistical significanceā.
Statistically Significant: Why It Makes a Difference - Tom McFie
"Questions remain about the death of a Hartford infant, despite governorās claim death was linked to coronavirus
An official cause of death remains outstanding pending toxicology results, and officials said it is possible the child died not from the virus but from an underlying condition, sudden infant death syndrome or positional asphyxiation.
In the absence of that official determination Friday, Lamont and Connecticut State Epidemiologist Matthew Cartter retreated from directly connecting the cause of the infantās death to the virus.
[Democrat] "...Lamont presented the babyās death as specifically caused by the virus, even though Chief Medical Examiner James Gillās official cause of death finding is still outstanding."
Questions remain about the death of a Hartford infant, despite governorās claim death was linked to coronavirus
Despite Gov. Ned Lamont's announcement this week that a six-week-old infant in Hartford was the youngest fatality of the coronavirus pandemic, medical examiners still have not officially ruled the virus played any role in the child's death.
www.courant.com
The death toll is inflated to weaponize it against the current administration.