I would love to hear the tape. Wouldn't you?

FAKE NEWS!

The feds DID NOT in any way use lawfare.

There was real probable cause evidence, found by a grand jury, that Trump likely broke the law....and should have gone to trial....and if found guilty, he indeed committed the crimes, and if found not guilty by the jury of 12, then he would have been not guilty of the crimes.
"Lawfare" has become a catchall meme for trumples just like "fake news." Just as they refer to damning reporting about Dear Leader as fake news, so too they refer to legitimate, fact based prosecutions as lawfare. It's an emotional crutch so they don't have to face the truth.
 
If any of this....... Epstein files........Homan video.......J6 videos......could have done Trump in
Obviously not. Video footage of trump's J6 mob beating Capital police officers and desecrating the Capital building were readily available before the 2024 election.
 
That is your story. What might help your case is if you decide to provide proof.
Given that trump's DoJ is in possession of the evidence, and refuses to reveal it, what proof can anyone on a message board provide other than well sourced reporting?

Leading me to ask, why did trumples on the board eagerly accept every accusation made against the Biden's as gospel without requiring the same standard of evidence you demand regarding the Homan case?
 
Obviously not.
because there was no crime committed berg
Given that trump's DoJ is in possession of the evidence, and refuses to reveal it, what proof can anyone on a message board provide other than well sourced reporting?
and just why would 'evidence' need to be made public for validation berg?

~S~
 
because there was no crime committed berg

and just why would 'evidence' need to be made public for validation berg?

~S~
Crimes were committed, people were indicted, defendants were convicted.

Please take the opportunity to rewrite your question. It's too stupid to respond to as written.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom