I would love to hear the tape. Wouldn't you?

[struth]

Who said the tape didn’t exist? Bondi testified she didn’t know.

Why would she know? The dems are saying there is one, nobody else

 

[marvin martian]

Who said the tape didn’t exist? Bondi testified she didn’t know.

What did you hear when you listened to it?

 

[Marener]

Why would she know? The dems are saying there is one, nobody else

She’s the head of the agency, so I’d expect her to know these things. But I agree that it’s entirely possible that she is not well informed.

The next thing to do would be to ask Kash Patel if it exists but I imagine he’s never going to answer that question under oath.

Who told you the tape is “nonexistent”?

 

[sparky]

If any of this....... Epstein files........Homan video.......J6 videos......could have done Trump in, the D's would have released them as soon as they knew of them

But they didn't, did they?
~S~

 

[struth]

She’s the head of the agency, so I’d expect her to know these things. But I agree that it’s entirely possible that she is not well informed.

The next thing to do would be to ask Kash Patel if it exists but I imagine he’s never going to answer that question under oath.

Who told you the tape is “nonexistent”?

You expect her to know about an investigation that took place long before she was there?

Adam Shift was in Congress in 2024 and on committee, with oversight of the fbi l, why didn’t he know?

 

[Marener]

If any of this....... Epstein files........Homan video.......J6 videos......could have done Trump in, the D's would have released them as soon as they knew of them

But they didn't, did they?
~S~

doing so would have violated DoJ policy and the Biden DoJ wasn’t interested in breaking the rules for political purposes.

That’s Trump’s DoJ.

 

[struth]

doing so would have violated DoJ policy and the Biden DoJ wasn’t interested in breaking the rules for political purposes.

That’s Trump’s DoJ.

They just illegally appointed Jack smith


Please

 

[Marener]

You expect her to know about an investigation that took place long before she was there?

Adam Shift was in Congress in 2024 and on committee, with oversight of the fbi l, why didn’t he know?

The FBI doesn’t inform Congress of all ongoing investigations. Never has.

The investigation was ongoing when she took charge of the DoJ. As we already showed, you lied about it being concluded before she took office. A competent AG would know about these very sensitive decisions being made by her subordinates.

Who told you the tape was nonexistent?

 

[Marener]

They just illegally appointed Jack smith


Please

Every recent administration has appointed special prosecutors. It’s in the DoJ regulations.

 

[marvin martian]

Who told you the tape was nonexistent?

You've heard it? You know someone who's heard it? Someone has claimed they've heard it?

 

[struth]

The FBI doesn’t inform Congress of all ongoing investigations. Never has.

The investigation was ongoing when she took charge of the DoJ. As we already showed, you lied about it being concluded before she took office. A competent AG would know about these very sensitive decisions being made by her subordinates.

Who told you the tape was nonexistent?

The investigation was closed before he took office

That’s what the testimony was

Try again

Adam Shifty had oversight of the fbi and wasn’t aware of what was going on about an investigation of an alleged bribe of a govt official?? Wow

We’ve seen zero evidence if its existence

In fact the story about it doesn’t even make sense

 

[struth]

Every recent administration has appointed special prosecutors. It’s in the DoJ regulations.

Yeah just not illegally, that was reserved for the xiden admin to go after the guy running for office against Xiden

 

[Marener]

The investigation was closed before he took office

That’s what the testimony was

Try again

Adam Shifty had oversight of the fbi and wasn’t aware of what was going on about an investigation of an alleged bribe of a govt official?? Wow

We’ve seen zero evidence if its existence

In fact the story about it doesn’t even make sense

Post the testimony that says it was closed before Trump took office.

 

[struth]

Post the testimony that says it was closed before Trump took office.

Sorry before Bondi took office, is what I was trying to say, since that was who you were talking about

 

[marvin martian]

The investigation was closed before he took office

That’s what the testimony was

Try again

Adam Shifty had oversight of the fbi and wasn’t aware of what was going on about an investigation of an alleged bribe of a govt official?? Wow

We’ve seen zero evidence if its existence

In fact the story about it doesn’t even make sense

The whole thing belongs in the garbage next to the Trump pee tape story and the Russian collusion hoax.

DemoKKKrats are the most gullible retards on the planet.

 

[Marener]

Sorry before Bondi took office, is what I was trying to say, since that was who you were talking about

Post the testimony that says it was closed before she took office.

 

[Marener]

The whole thing belongs in the garbage next to the Trump pee tape story and the Russian collusion hoax.

DemoKKKrats are the most gullible retards on the planet.

If the tape of Homan taking a bribe doesn’t exist, why won’t they just say that?

 

[struth]

Post the testimony that says it was closed before she took office.

I did back in post 368

 

[struth]

If the tape of Homan taking a bribe doesn’t exist, why won’t they just say that?

They have

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/10/16/tom-homan-50k-sting-operation-00611219

White House denies border tsar Tom Homan accepted $50,000 bribe

The White House says FBI agents under the last administration had tried to "entrap" Homan.

www.bbc.com

 

[Robert W]

I'm saying the FBI can not just easily get $50,000 in cash to set up somebody of no significance. There are strict rules to guide sting operations. Someone, a rat as trump calls them but in any normal person's life, a credible whistle blower, tipped the FBI off.

That is your story. What might help your case is if you decide to provide proof.