Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I think that's a modified belief that Popes can be wrong. I think the more correct rhetoric is saying that the Pope can be wrongly interpreted.Saying it doesn't make it true. Popes can be wrong. It doesn't make them invalid.
Yes and I disagree that the Vatican is NOT the true Catholic religion. I've heard you say this all before. Many times. You've created countless OP's which are all the same damn thing. The forum is littered with YOUR threads on the EXACT SAME SUBJECT.Did you even read the OP?
Or do you just insist on attacking people... what? to release your personal frustrations... like when the spouse doesn't 'act right' and you "can't" take it out on that person so you go to the internet?
I don't need anybody's advice on what constitutes a 'personal attack'. And I don't need or have asked a moderator to react to yours.You should talk to a mod. OP's are subject to questions of motive and bias. It comes with the territory.
No, you can't. You are too heavily invested in it.I just meant that I could be dissuaded from a few lesser points...
If you can supply a link that deals with the question on the deviant behaviour of the church, I'll give it a fair chance.It entirely deals with it. That's its purpose.
I would bet money the unborn do not want the "diversity of thought" known as legalized abortion. Of course there would be no point in actually asking them...They aren't two different paths per se. They are opposite sides of the same coin. There are no differences of opinions about problems (the coin). Differences are about the solutions (two sides of the coin) to the problems. The beauty of God's world is that we are free to pursue wrong things but since error can't stand eventually we discover the truth. Diversity of thought is critical to that process. It's OK to have different opinions. It's how one goes about discussing the different opinions that matters.
If you don't believe it I doubt it happens for you.And if you say you don't believe that, the human smoke rises at Smithfield.
Just as well they aren't so powerful now. Fewer attacks on children lately, too. I hope.
www.documentcloud.org
oh, so you know me better than I know myself.. My, aren't you impressive?No, you can't. You are too heavily invested in it.
I did recommend something to read. I read it.I haven't the time to read reports that may or may not deal with the perversions of many Catholic priests and the Pope's response (or lack of) to those incidents of pedophilia.
If you can recommend some reading that can somehow justify it or excuse it, I would at least give it a chance.
www.documentcloud.org
How about this information:
There was no huge pedo scandal in the Catholic Church (now known as Vatican sect) until Vatican II. I have been telling people until I'm blue in the face that the Vatican has been highjacked by liberals/Communists... etc.. There is no other explanation, to speak of, for all the pedo cases the "Church" has had (but the Church is no longer in the Vatican) since 1958, getting worse every year, I am sure..
www.documentcloud.org
I'm sorry that you can't believe God exists or that existence is wonderful unless everything is utopia. I don't have that problem. If you don't feel that existence is incredible you can always see yourself out. As for the existence of God that does not hinge on you believing you have perfect knowledge and that God is doing it wrong. It only hinges on the indirect evidence for God which you have never studied or examined.I can perceive no beauty in a god's world unless the pedophilia is roundly condemned and actions are taken to rid the church of it completely.
Some of the Pope's have failed and the OP is bringing that back into daylight.
State your case for the church's chosen path of ignoring the evil. This isn't a discussion in which we can talk about a god's beauty.
The current Pope dealt with Canada's aboriginals first, then they were willing to talk of some beauty.
Sue me.There is no apostrophe in the plural word Popes
Thank you for your concern.I'm sorry that you can't believe God exists or that existence is wonderful unless everything is utopia. I don't have that problem. If you don't feel that existence is incredible you can always see yourself out. As for the existence of God that does not hinge on you believing you have perfect knowledge and that God is doing it wrong. It only hinges on the indirect evidence for God which you have never studied or examined.
You aren't qualified. You are a convert. And not a particularly impressive one at that. I've know several converts and they were exceptional. You on the other hand seem like a fundamentalist, an evangelical, a Protestant. You have latched on to some website and that's the religion you follow.but anyhow, I am not talking about differences of opinion in, say, what interpretation of Scripture is acceptable or not, as important as that issue is. And what you say here about popes was true BEFORE 1958. It is no longer true because the popes since Roncalli are fake... they highjacked the Vatican from the Catholic Church, probably by killing Pius XII first although I do not claim to have irrefutable proof he was murdered. Some speculate he was, though.. people who study this thing in-depth. . people I trust. And let me tell you, that is one hell of a SHORT list (people I trust)
you have some weird psychological problemYes and I disagree that the Vatican is NOT the true Catholic religion. I've heard you say this all before. Many times. You've created countless OP's which are all the same damn thing. The forum is littered with YOUR threads on the EXACT SAME SUBJECT.
So, yeah, I read the OP.
oh, I'm a convert.You aren't qualified. You are a convert. And not a particularly impressive one at that. I've know several converts and they were exceptional. You on the other hand seem like a fundamentalist, an evangelical, a Protestant. You have latched on to some website and that's the religion you follow.
But I'm not. I have peace through the storm because I have no preference for any outcome. I roll with the punches and figure out what I was supposed to learn. It's pretty amazing.Thank you for your concern.
Maybe you should go research this on the web. Here... let me help.I think that's a modified belief that Popes can be wrong. I think the more correct rhetoric is saying that the Pope can be wrongly interpreted.
Or would you prefer, wrongly represented?
Or would you be sticking with a Pope being valid and wrong, together at the same time?
Or do we have to revisit allegory, rhetoric, and embellishment again?
tradicat.blogspot.com
I'm telling you what a mod told me about this subject.I don't need anybody's advice on what constitutes a 'personal attack'. And I don't need or have asked a moderator to react to yours.
