playtime
Diamond Member
- Aug 18, 2015
- 55,542
- 47,887
- 3,645
But if married a woman may have an abortion and the man has no say....you see....only one choice.What if she pokes a hole in the condom? What if you are married why would they use protection? You are very myopic in your views.What if she poked a hole in the condom? What if she did drug him? What if she did say she was on the pill and she was not? A man should have some rights. But you are not really pro choice.What if she trapped him?A choice in whether or not to be fiscally responsible for the child once its born. Why can a man not have the right to sign a piece of paper where he gives up all rights but also all fiscal responsibility? Why can a man not have that choice?I agree, why can't men get a choice?Nope. What about when men don't want to take care of the kid, should they not be allowed that choice? Sign a piece of paper giving up all rights but also not having to have to pay for the kid? I believe in choice for both sexes. You do not cause you're fake inclusive.I was nine years old in Dec 1989...context...are you equally pro choice for the men, I wonder?How? My kids have to play sports vs. trans girls? That is 100% a Democrat POV. My kids are currently my priority.Honestly don't care. My people are literally being slaughtered and the Democratic Party is blaming Israel, the only Democracy in the Middle East. My kids are dealing with open antisemitism. Trump is the least of my worries these days but you enjoy.Cohen is not credible IMO. But whatever.
perhaps i'll poke you when donny's indicted.
New grand jury seated for next stage of Trump investigation
By MICHAEL R. SISAKtoday
NEW YORK (AP) — New York prosecutors have convened a special grand jury to consider evidence in a criminal investigation into former President Donald Trump’s business dealings, a person familiar with the matter told The Associated Press on Tuesday.
The development signals that the Manhattan district attorney’s office was moving toward seeking charges as a result of its two-year investigation, which included a lengthy legal battle to obtain Trump’s tax records.
New grand jury seated for next stage of Trump investigation
those are 2 different things azog. you could care about both & prioritize without eliminating all but one.
my gender's autonomy decisions & their affected desired futures are being disintegrated daily & you don't care.
see how that works?
i really don't want to bring family members into this, but lets just say, someday in the not too distant future, your girls may be faced with a choice that's no longer there. i care enough about them ( even though i never met them ) not only about the antisemitism ( it's horrible & i want them to stay happy & safe )
but also about what they would want for themselves re: their bodies.
I marched in a Pro-Choice demonstration in early December of 1989. The put me at the head of the parade holding the banner. My daughter was born less than 3 months later. I knew they were asking me to do this to show the true meaning of choice. This was my choice.
I marched for the daughter I was carrying, and for her older sister. And for my friend who had 2 children before her 18th birthday, and was leaving her abusive, alcoholic husband, only to discover she was pregnant again. And for the young girl in my own family who was raped by her stepfather, resulting in her being pregnant at age 13. All women need to know that they have the autonomy over our own bodies that God gave us.
I was blessed. Even under difficult circumstances, I had the support, the resources, and the luck to never need an abortion. But I always knew that if something terrible had happened, that option was there if needed. I want that for my daughters, granddaughters, and all women.
When men get pregnant, and have to make the choice for their own bodies, yes, they too can make that decision.
because it's not a 'kid' until it breathes air & is not at fault for being born by the female who chose to carry full term, give birth, & raise.
most abortions are performed well b4 viability when the only person who knows & should know & should decide what her destiny will be.
because a man cannot carry & be subjected to the physical/emotional/psychological aspects of such a major undertaking.
i just told you. when she AND he consent to the possibility of a pregnancy happening ... both aren't equal in that decision. it's just one of them things that are - just like when you said about 'equality'.
after a child is born, then that is the outcome HE has to accept since he accepted that possibility of the first squirt.
if she has, then he must.
she didn't rape him. that's 'trapping'. if he rawdogged, he takes full responsibility for his behavior. if he 'trusts' a female to say she's on the pill but still doesn't use his own birth control then he's risking more than just a pregnancy.
equality ends after conception.
Bring your own condoms. If she says she's on the Pill, and you don't use a condom, what's protecting you from AIDS, herpes, syphillis? Why aren't YOU protecting YOURSELF.
The man has the right to keep it in his pants or to bring his own protection.
if they are married then the question is moot. a marriage is a union & he would be responsible financially. any scumbag who is married & has a kid & then turns his back on it is worse than a scumbag.
goes back to that equality thing & some times males & females aren't equal.... right, zoggy?
or do you mean just when you say so?