I didn't know this

[Gdjjr]

The traitors of the so-called confederacy began the war and bear all responsibility for it.

Traitors to whom? Envious Northerners or their own homes?

 

[TNHarley]

Any source that refers to "The War of Northern Aggression" can be summarily dismissed as not anywhere near worth taking seriously.

And yet it was the War of Northern Aggression. Anyone who says it wasn’t, has self identified as a fool.

If Lincoln doesn’t invade, there is no war. So dummy, who was the aggressor? The north or the south?

Not a trick question, but it dupes dummies.

The traitors of the so-called confederacy began the war and bear all responsibility for it.

Bullshit

 

[Unkotare]

Any source that refers to "The War of Northern Aggression" can be summarily dismissed as not anywhere near worth taking seriously.

And yet it was the War of Northern Aggression. Anyone who says it wasn’t, has self identified as a fool.

If Lincoln doesn’t invade, there is no war. So dummy, who was the aggressor? The north or the south?

Not a trick question, but it dupes dummies.

The traitors of the so-called confederacy began the war and bear all responsibility for it.

Bullshit

Fact.

 

[TNHarley]

Any source that refers to "The War of Northern Aggression" can be summarily dismissed as not anywhere near worth taking seriously.

And yet it was the War of Northern Aggression. Anyone who says it wasn’t, has self identified as a fool.

If Lincoln doesn’t invade, there is no war. So dummy, who was the aggressor? The north or the south?

Not a trick question, but it dupes dummies.

The traitors of the so-called confederacy began the war and bear all responsibility for it.

Bullshit

Fact.

Says a statist chicom

 

[Unkotare]

Any source that refers to "The War of Northern Aggression" can be summarily dismissed as not anywhere near worth taking seriously.

And yet it was the War of Northern Aggression. Anyone who says it wasn’t, has self identified as a fool.

If Lincoln doesn’t invade, there is no war. So dummy, who was the aggressor? The north or the south?

Not a trick question, but it dupes dummies.

The traitors of the so-called confederacy began the war and bear all responsibility for it.

Bullshit

Fact.

Says a statist chicom

Guess again, Junior.

 

[Bezukhov]

Any source that refers to "The War of Northern Aggression" can be summarily dismissed as not anywhere near worth taking seriously.

And yet it was the War of Northern Aggression. Anyone who says it wasn’t, has self identified as a fool.

If Lincoln doesn’t invade, there is no war. So dummy, who was the aggressor? The north or the south?

Not a trick question, but it dupes dummies.

Right! When the Confederates shelled Ft Sumter the North was supposed to have said: "Thank you! Please shell us some more!!"

Lol. The old Ft Sumter tired old bs.

The fort was in another country. They were told to leave, but Abe lied and set up events and he still duped you 159 years later.

Hey let’s start a war that murders 850,000 Americans because they shelled a fort in which no one was killed.

DAMN!


Can’t fix stupid.

So we should get out of Guantanamo toot sweet.

 

[gipper]

Any source that refers to "The War of Northern Aggression" can be summarily dismissed as not anywhere near worth taking seriously.

And yet it was the War of Northern Aggression. Anyone who says it wasn’t, has self identified as a fool.

If Lincoln doesn’t invade, there is no war. So dummy, who was the aggressor? The north or the south?

Not a trick question, but it dupes dummies.

The traitors of the so-called confederacy began the war and bear all responsibility for it.

You might know something about Japanese history, but you know nothing about American history.

 

[Marion Morrison]

Linking a TDS-afflicted Brit Late Night host on a Democrat propaganda channel when discussing the American Civil War does not add to your credibility.

 

[Unkotare]

The traitors of the so-called confederacy began the war and bear all responsibility for it.

Traitors to whom? ...

To the Union; to the Republic and the principles upon which it was founded.

 

[Marion Morrison]

The traitors of the so-called confederacy began the war and bear all responsibility for it.

Traitors to whom? ...

To the Union; to the Republic and the principles upon which it was founded.

Was there a law against seceding from the Union?

 

[Unkotare]

The traitors of the so-called confederacy began the war and bear all responsibility for it.

Traitors to whom? ...

To the Union; to the Republic and the principles upon which it was founded.

Was there a law against seceding from the Union?

How many times does the same thing have to be covered? "Perpetual Union," "Texas v White," and oh, that little thing about attacking a federal fort. It has all been discussed over and over and over.

 

[Marion Morrison]

The traitors of the so-called confederacy began the war and bear all responsibility for it.

Traitors to whom? ...

To the Union; to the Republic and the principles upon which it was founded.

Was there a law against seceding from the Union?

How many times does the same thing have to be covered? "Perpetual Union," "Texas v White," and oh, that little thing about attacking a federal fort. It has all been discussed over and over and over.

Onnnk!

 

[TNHarley]

The traitors of the so-called confederacy began the war and bear all responsibility for it.

Traitors to whom? ...

To the Union; to the Republic and the principles upon which it was founded.

Was there a law against seceding from the Union?

How many times does the same thing have to be covered? "Perpetual Union," "Texas v White," and oh, that little thing about attacking a federal fort. It has all been discussed over and over and over.

So, no. There wasnt.
Thanks

 

[Bezukhov]

Was slavery a valid reason for secession?

 

[Marion Morrison]

Was slavery a valid reason for secession?

It was minor reason involved with it, dumbass foreigner commie.

 

[Unkotare]

The traitors of the so-called confederacy began the war and bear all responsibility for it.

Traitors to whom? ...

To the Union; to the Republic and the principles upon which it was founded.

Was there a law against seceding from the Union?

How many times does the same thing have to be covered? "Perpetual Union," "Texas v White," and oh, that little thing about attacking a federal fort. It has all been discussed over and over and over.

So, no. There wasnt.
Thanks

So yes, the actions of the traitors were unlawful and immoral.

 

[Marion Morrison]

The traitors of the so-called confederacy began the war and bear all responsibility for it.

Traitors to whom? ...

To the Union; to the Republic and the principles upon which it was founded.

Was there a law against seceding from the Union?

How many times does the same thing have to be covered? "Perpetual Union," "Texas v White," and oh, that little thing about attacking a federal fort. It has all been discussed over and over and over.

So, no. There wasnt.
Thanks

So yes, the actions of the traitors were unlawful and immoral.

Wrong! Jap boy!

 

[Unkotare]

Was slavery a valid reason for secession?

It was minor reason involved with it, dumbass foreigner commie.

Slavery underlay all the many factors that led to the Civil War.

 

[TNHarley]

The traitors of the so-called confederacy began the war and bear all responsibility for it.

Traitors to whom? ...

To the Union; to the Republic and the principles upon which it was founded.

Was there a law against seceding from the Union?

How many times does the same thing have to be covered? "Perpetual Union," "Texas v White," and oh, that little thing about attacking a federal fort. It has all been discussed over and over and over.

So, no. There wasnt.
Thanks

So yes, the actions of the traitors were unlawful and immoral.

Yet, you cant cite how.
But whatevs broski. Keep on lyin if you wanna

 

[Unkotare]

The traitors of the so-called confederacy began the war and bear all responsibility for it.

Traitors to whom? ...

To the Union; to the Republic and the principles upon which it was founded.

Was there a law against seceding from the Union?

How many times does the same thing have to be covered? "Perpetual Union," "Texas v White," and oh, that little thing about attacking a federal fort. It has all been discussed over and over and over.

So, no. There wasnt.
Thanks

So yes, the actions of the traitors were unlawful and immoral.

Wrong! ... boy!

Right! And that's "Mick Boy" to you, wannabe reb.