How many times has humanity been wiped down to near extinction?

Where the outlet to plug in the Stargate? Has to be ZPE
For those that place their "believes" onto an Ancient Alien Stargate:

Stargates could be primarily powered by Dial-Home Devices (DHDs), which contain long-lasting power cores. - As such zero point energy wouldn't be a basic necessity or requirement - which would make it far more "feasible" then a ZPE that defies our present knowledge/assumption of physics, independent of how to extract it.

Every place in the universe beholds zero point energy, so there is no differential value due to zero point energy being everywhere, that could therefore be extracted and used. Aka every spot in the universe has at least that amount of energy already.
 
Translation: I only watched the first 90 seconds of the 80 minute video and got lost right after the introduction
1777505750734.webp
 
With the recent discovery of Gobekli Tepi, it's indisputable that a prior, advanced human civilization was laid low during the Younger Dryas. By itself it speaks to a prior civilization that warned doom from the sky above. Then you add to it that the Egyptian Priest who told that the destruction happened 9,000 years prior, also dating back to the Younger Dryas.

With respect to the dating of the Sphinx and Great Pyramid, it's clear that these were already there when the Egyptians arrived. Since both the Sphinx and Pyramids show water erosion, they too predate the Younger Dryas. The question is: did the builder of the Pyramids intentionally make a construct they KNEW would survive the certain destruction?

Humans have been the same genetically for 200,000 plus years. The idea that we only developed technology a few thousand years ago is now demonstrable false. They was at least one prior, advanced civilization. I suspect there were others as well

Thoughts?

0*lAAyiJJfswJeasxI


Göbekli Tepe - Wikipedia

View attachment 853673
I am too lazy at the moment to find out the man’s name. But I’ve seen him (more of an investigative journalist than an actual archeologist) on a couple of shows about this topic. Like on some Discovery type show.

Very interesting stuff.
 
I am too lazy at the moment to find out the man’s name. But I’ve seen him (more of an investigative journalist than an actual archeologist) on a couple of shows about this topic. Like on some Discovery type show.

Very interesting stuff.

Jimmy Corsetti at Bright Insight has done several good shows on Gobekli Tepi
 
I am too lazy at the moment to find out the man’s name. But I’ve seen him (more of an investigative journalist than an actual archeologist) on a couple of shows about this topic. Like on some Discovery type show.

Very interesting stuff.
Oh Graham Hancock!
 
Yes. Wiki denigrates his views as pseudoscience. Maybe. Maybe not. But his “Ancient Apocolypse” show was still very intriguing.
He raises some very interesting points that can’t be dismissed because he’s not a “trained archaeologist”

It’s bizarre especially since Gobekli Tepi completely undid “trained archaeology”

I also recommend Bass Forge who finds stunning parallels between ancient archaeology and modern devices, symatics, etc
 
In what way would Gobekli Tepi, supposedly "undo" trained archeology??




 
Yes, part and parcel in your brand of nuttery is to hold contempt for education and expertise.
Wrong.

I have contempt for skooling, not education.

If you had been more concerned with your education rather than letting your skooling condition you to be obedient to experts, you too would be able to exercise critical thinking.
 
15th post
Hahaha

So, youtube education. Not universities. Not scientific rigor or published science.

It's what I said.

Thanks for the demonstration.

Pick something out of the videos posted and explain why it is conclusively wrong.

Otherwise? Step-off with your silly little ad hom arguments.
 




Posting web articles - doesn't proof anything in regards to my question:
In what way would Gobekli Tepi, supposedly "undo" trained archeology? - well it totally doesn't - since ALL articles, knowledge and assumptions regarding Gobekli Tepi are the direct RESULT of trained archeology.

Furthermore keep in mind that of the existing/known GT areal - so far only 5% have been dug out and researched upon, via trained archeology.

That a city or city building civilization wasn't necessary to built a religious/spiritual landmark of impressive size and skill - has already been proven by various other monolithic sites - e.g. Stonehenge. - independent of a city-settlement site less then 100km? from GT that is estimated to be as old as GT (with some claiming it to be even older then GT).
 
Posting web articles - doesn't proof anything in regards to my question:
In what way would Gobekli Tepi, supposedly "undo" trained archeology? - well it totally doesn't - since ALL articles, knowledge and assumptions regarding Gobekli Tepi are the direct RESULT of trained archeology.

Furthermore keep in mind that of the existing/known GT areal - so far only 5% have been dug out and researched upon, via trained archeology.

That a city or city building civilization wasn't necessary to built a religious/spiritual landmark of impressive size and skill - has already been proven by various other monolithic sites - e.g. Stonehenge. - independent of a city-settlement site less then 100km? from GT that is estimated to be as old as GT (with some claiming it to be even older then GT).
The have found evidence already that GT had been occupied and lived in, it was likely more than just ceremonial.

I believe what Frank meant, is that GT has upended the narrative of the first civilization originating in the fertile crescent with Sumeria.
 
Last edited:

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom