James Carville Goes Ballistic on Supreme Court Justices

DonGlock26

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2024
Messages
18,087
Reaction score
26,591
Points
2,288



Clinton's old campaign manager loses it again. He's not handling losing politically well.
 
He is right to point out that those 9 judges have a crazy amount of power to not be subjected to ethics rules. We don’t want wealthy right wing or left wing billionaires owning judges.

You guys are gonna freak out in 10 years when it’s a liberal court and they are all living in Soros Jr’s beach house in the winters. Rightly so.
 
He is right to point out that those 9 judges have a crazy amount of power to not be subjected to ethics rules. We don’t want wealthy right wing or left wing billionaires owning judges.

You guys are gonna freak out in 10 years when it’s a liberal court and they are all living in Soros Jr’s beach house in the winters. Rightly so.

Were they subject to ethics rules when the court was liberal?
 
Looks like he's living in a motel.

He keeps swearing like that and the Whispering Oaks Knotty Pine Nursing Home will sedate him. He'll be face first in his oatmeal.
 
Does Carville broadcast directly from his subterranean lair in Kenya, or does he go into a studio?

1777723490809.webp
 
Were they subject to ethics rules when the court was liberal?
The court has been liberal and conservative multiple times. It will flip conservative to liberal and back again multiple times. It’s a common sense activity to ensure the independence.
 
Were they subject to ethics rules when the court was liberal?
Liberals good, conservatives bad

Only conservatives are corrupt don't ya know.jj

In fact, if it were not for conservatives, we would not need any laws at all.
 
The court has been liberal and conservative multiple times. It will flip conservative to liberal and back again multiple times. It’s a common sense activity to ensure the independence.
We are being given a respite for a few years to think over what we are doing. Or what you are doing. There is no going ack peacefully once communism becomes entrenched. You will love Homeland Security then which includes ICE. They will jackboot people who go against the all-powerful commie party. Merrick Garland gave us a glimpse.
 
The court has been liberal and conservative multiple times. It will flip conservative to liberal and back again multiple times. It’s a common sense activity to ensure the independence.

Answer the question please.
 
We are being given a respite for a few years to think over what we are doing. Or what you are doing. There is no going ack peacefully once communism becomes entrenched. You will love Homeland Security then which includes ICE. They will jackboot people who go against the all-powerful commie party. Merrick Garland gave us a glimpse.
Quit being an asshat. No one wants communism you twit. Why do you want a country of pedophiles?

How about we debate REAL stuff. Not made up stuff?

This thread is simply about having ethic rules around the supreme court. Its a very logical suggestion. Im glad the OP brought it up.
 
Answer the question please.
I did. Its never been in place for liberal or conservative courts. I can assure you that if Ginsberg were vacationing at Soro's estate every summer it would have come up. But she wasnt. Or at least it wasnt in the news.

How could you possibly be against this idea?
 
Back
Top Bottom