How Do We Know Jesus Rose Again?

[surada]

OK. Let me get this straight.

So some dude named Jesus is a bit of a rabble rouser. Often rails against the local and Roman government.

Then one day he gathers up a gang of a dozen thugs and occupies and violently attacks a market while armed with a scourge. And took the coins.

That's called armed robbery in today's parlance.

Today that could get you several years in prison.

Back then, armed robbery could get you crucified.

Can you identify all the times Jesus defied Roman authorities or violated Roman laws?

His problem with the money changers wasn't about the Temple Tax. It was about shortchanging the poor and the pilgrims to the Temple. They were just cheating the poor.

Kinda like if they outlawed pennies in the USA?

What?????

 

[irosie91]

OK. Let me get this straight.

So some dude named Jesus is a bit of a rabble rouser. Often rails against the local and Roman government.

the attack on the "money changers" in the temple courtyard was NOT ROBBERY. It was an act of sedition----in fact --AN ACT OF SEDITION AGAINST ROME

Then one day he gathers up a gang of a dozen thugs and occupies and violently attacks a market while armed with a scourge. And took the coins.

That's called armed robbery in today's parlance.

Today that could get you several years in prison.

Back then, armed robbery could get you crucified.

Well, he never took the coins, and today taking less than $960 in California is a ticket.

How do you know that the armed robber known as Jesus did not take any coins? "It's not cuz I robbed the market, it's cuz I'm black!"...."Dat be why dey crucifying me"!

"I dindu it!"...said almost every common criminal ever.


Yes you did do it. And your nigga Judas fingered you as the mastermind of the heist. You are flat out busted. You cannot even try to deny it. It's over.

That kind of crybaby bullshit doesn't impress me, dindu.

 

[irosie91]

OK. Let me get this straight.

So some dude named Jesus is a bit of a rabble rouser. Often rails against the local and Roman government.

Then one day he gathers up a gang of a dozen thugs and occupies and violently attacks a market while armed with a scourge. And took the coins.

That's called armed robbery in today's parlance.

Today that could get you several years in prison.

Back then, armed robbery could get you crucified.

Can you identify all the times Jesus defied Roman authorities or violated Roman laws?

His problem with the money changers wasn't about the Temple Tax. It was about shortchanging the poor and the pilgrims to the Temple. They were just cheating the poor.

for a "scholar" such as yourself--SURADIE, your statement is EXCRUTIATINGLY IDIOTIC.
There is EXTENSIVE EVIDENCE that the PHARISEES despised the money changers who were lackeys of the ROMAN APPOINTED SADDUCEAN priests-------try to learn a bit of history. The foray into the temple courtyard nails Jesus for what he was-----a ROME HATING PHARISEE. It was an act of SEDITION AGAINST ROME and had nothing to do with short-changing anyone-------well----at least you did not do the usual sunday school bs ---"da high priests were grabbing taxes from da poor"

 

[surada]

OK. Let me get this straight.

So some dude named Jesus is a bit of a rabble rouser. Often rails against the local and Roman government.

Then one day he gathers up a gang of a dozen thugs and occupies and violently attacks a market while armed with a scourge. And took the coins.

That's called armed robbery in today's parlance.

Today that could get you several years in prison.

Back then, armed robbery could get you crucified.

Can you identify all the times Jesus defied Roman authorities or violated Roman laws?

His problem with the money changers wasn't about the Temple Tax. It was about shortchanging the poor and the pilgrims to the Temple. They were just cheating the poor.

for a "scholar" such as yourself--SURADIE, your statement is EXCRUTIATINGLY IDIOTIC.
There is EXTENSIVE EVIDENCE that the PHARISEES despised the money changers who were lackeys of the ROMAN APPOINTED SADDUCEAN priests-------try to learn a bit of history. The foray into the temple courtyard nails Jesus for what he was-----a ROME HATING PHARISEE. It was an act of SEDITION AGAINST ROME and had nothing to do with short-changing anyone-------well----at least you did not do the usual sunday school bs ---"da high priests were grabbing taxes from da poor"

Nope.. The money changers weren't Romans. Jesus didn't oppose the Temple Tax.. He opposed taking advantage of the farmers and rubes from out of town. who came to Jerusalem for the Passover.

 

[Carl in Michigan]

It has been 2000 years...... by now rational people wonder why nothing changed since then.

You were prophesied.

"My Lord delays His coming"

 

[irosie91]

OK. Let me get this straight.

So some dude named Jesus is a bit of a rabble rouser. Often rails against the local and Roman government.

Then one day he gathers up a gang of a dozen thugs and occupies and violently attacks a market while armed with a scourge. And took the coins.

That's called armed robbery in today's parlance.

Today that could get you several years in prison.

Back then, armed robbery could get you crucified.

Can you identify all the times Jesus defied Roman authorities or violated Roman laws?

His problem with the money changers wasn't about the Temple Tax. It was about shortchanging the poor and the pilgrims to the Temple. They were just cheating the poor.

for a "scholar" such as yourself--SURADIE, your statement is EXCRUTIATINGLY IDIOTIC.
There is EXTENSIVE EVIDENCE that the PHARISEES despised the money changers who were lackeys of the ROMAN APPOINTED SADDUCEAN priests-------try to learn a bit of history. The foray into the temple courtyard nails Jesus for what he was-----a ROME HATING PHARISEE. It was an act of SEDITION AGAINST ROME and had nothing to do with short-changing anyone-------well----at least you did not do the usual sunday school bs ---"da high priests were grabbing taxes from da poor"

Nope.. The money changers weren't Romans. Jesus didn't oppose the Temple Tax.. He opposed taking advantage of the farmers and rubes from out of town. who came to Jerusalem for the Passover.

did I say that the money changers were romans? Of course Jesus did not oppose
the Temple tax----you are very confused---the Temple tax had nothing to do with the money
changers. The "out of towners"? what out of towners?-----the people who LIVED in Judea did not need the money changers----they already used Judean coinage. The issue was
people who arrived from OUTSIDE of Judea---
aka, gentiles who arrived to DO BUSINESS in the Temple Courtyard. The place had become
a den of roman corruption (in the minds of pharisees like Jesus) which involved the HATED Roman shill SADDUCEES. Review the
history of the JAVITS CENTER and ---try to remember "ON THE WATERFRONT"-----and
progresso tomato sauce, olive oil (Gemma too)

 

[Weatherman2020]

OK. Let me get this straight.

So some dude named Jesus is a bit of a rabble rouser. Often rails against the local and Roman government.

Then one day he gathers up a gang of a dozen thugs and occupies and violently attacks a market while armed with a scourge. And took the coins.

That's called armed robbery in today's parlance.

Today that could get you several years in prison.

Back then, armed robbery could get you crucified.

Can you identify all the times Jesus defied Roman authorities or violated Roman laws?

His problem with the money changers wasn't about the Temple Tax. It was about shortchanging the poor and the pilgrims to the Temple. They were just cheating the poor.

for a "scholar" such as yourself--SURADIE, your statement is EXCRUTIATINGLY IDIOTIC.
There is EXTENSIVE EVIDENCE that the PHARISEES despised the money changers who were lackeys of the ROMAN APPOINTED SADDUCEAN priests-------try to learn a bit of history. The foray into the temple courtyard nails Jesus for what he was-----a ROME HATING PHARISEE. It was an act of SEDITION AGAINST ROME and had nothing to do with short-changing anyone-------well----at least you did not do the usual sunday school bs ---"da high priests were grabbing taxes from da poor"

Jesus committed no crime against Rome. That’s why he bounced around between Herod and Pilate. None could find blame.

 

[surada]

OK. Let me get this straight.

So some dude named Jesus is a bit of a rabble rouser. Often rails against the local and Roman government.

Then one day he gathers up a gang of a dozen thugs and occupies and violently attacks a market while armed with a scourge. And took the coins.

That's called armed robbery in today's parlance.

Today that could get you several years in prison.

Back then, armed robbery could get you crucified.

Can you identify all the times Jesus defied Roman authorities or violated Roman laws?

His problem with the money changers wasn't about the Temple Tax. It was about shortchanging the poor and the pilgrims to the Temple. They were just cheating the poor.

for a "scholar" such as yourself--SURADIE, your statement is EXCRUTIATINGLY IDIOTIC.
There is EXTENSIVE EVIDENCE that the PHARISEES despised the money changers who were lackeys of the ROMAN APPOINTED SADDUCEAN priests-------try to learn a bit of history. The foray into the temple courtyard nails Jesus for what he was-----a ROME HATING PHARISEE. It was an act of SEDITION AGAINST ROME and had nothing to do with short-changing anyone-------well----at least you did not do the usual sunday school bs ---"da high priests were grabbing taxes from da poor"

Nope.. The money changers weren't Romans. Jesus didn't oppose the Temple Tax.. He opposed taking advantage of the farmers and rubes from out of town. who came to Jerusalem for the Passover.

did I say that the money changers were romans? Of course Jesus did not oppose
the Temple tax----you are very confused---the Temple tax had nothing to do with the money
changers. The "out of towners"? what out of towners?-----the people who LIVED in Judea did not need the money changers----they already used Judean coinage. The issue was
people who arrived from OUTSIDE of Judea---
aka, gentiles who arrived to DO BUSINESS in the Temple Courtyard. The place had become
a den of roman corruption (in the minds of pharisees like Jesus) which involved the HATED Roman shill SADDUCEES. Review the
history of the JAVITS CENTER and ---try to remember "ON THE WATERFRONT"-----and
progresso tomato sauce, olive oil (Gemma too)

To buy and sell you had to use Roman coins with the head of Caesar on the coin. It had to be changed to Shekels to purchase sacrifices like birds and lambs. Remember ? The Mark of the Beast???

 

[norwegen]

OK. Let me get this straight.

So some dude named Jesus is a bit of a rabble rouser. Often rails against the local and Roman government.

Then one day he gathers up a gang of a dozen thugs and occupies and violently attacks a market while armed with a scourge. And took the coins.

That's called armed robbery in today's parlance.

Today that could get you several years in prison.

Back then, armed robbery could get you crucified.

Can you identify all the times Jesus defied Roman authorities or violated Roman laws?

His problem with the money changers wasn't about the Temple Tax. It was about shortchanging the poor and the pilgrims to the Temple. They were just cheating the poor.

for a "scholar" such as yourself--SURADIE, your statement is EXCRUTIATINGLY IDIOTIC.
There is EXTENSIVE EVIDENCE that the PHARISEES despised the money changers who were lackeys of the ROMAN APPOINTED SADDUCEAN priests-------try to learn a bit of history. The foray into the temple courtyard nails Jesus for what he was-----a ROME HATING PHARISEE. It was an act of SEDITION AGAINST ROME and had nothing to do with short-changing anyone-------well----at least you did not do the usual sunday school bs ---"da high priests were grabbing taxes from da poor"

What? The justice Jesus meted out in a Jewish temple was sedition against Rome?

Have you read the New Testament? Jesus constantly lashed out against the Jews, never against Rome. Jesus came to redeem his people, Israel, and showed little regard for Rome one way or the other. What he hated was the generations of corruption in the temple that his generation of Pharisees and their scribes was perpetuating.

 

[surada]

OK. Let me get this straight.

So some dude named Jesus is a bit of a rabble rouser. Often rails against the local and Roman government.

Then one day he gathers up a gang of a dozen thugs and occupies and violently attacks a market while armed with a scourge. And took the coins.

That's called armed robbery in today's parlance.

Today that could get you several years in prison.

Back then, armed robbery could get you crucified.

Can you identify all the times Jesus defied Roman authorities or violated Roman laws?

His problem with the money changers wasn't about the Temple Tax. It was about shortchanging the poor and the pilgrims to the Temple. They were just cheating the poor.

for a "scholar" such as yourself--SURADIE, your statement is EXCRUTIATINGLY IDIOTIC.
There is EXTENSIVE EVIDENCE that the PHARISEES despised the money changers who were lackeys of the ROMAN APPOINTED SADDUCEAN priests-------try to learn a bit of history. The foray into the temple courtyard nails Jesus for what he was-----a ROME HATING PHARISEE. It was an act of SEDITION AGAINST ROME and had nothing to do with short-changing anyone-------well----at least you did not do the usual sunday school bs ---"da high priests were grabbing taxes from da poor"

Jesus committed no crime against Rome. That’s why he bounced around between Herod and Pilate. None could find blame.

Jesus was pretty safe in the north. Herod Agrippa didn't pay him any mind.

Herod Agrippa II (Hebrew: אגריפס‎) (AD 27/28 – c. 92 or 100 ) officially named Marcus Julius Agrippa and sometimes shortened to Agrippa, was the eighth and last ruler from the Herodian dynasty. He was the fifth member of this dynasty to bear the title of king, but he reigned over territories outside of Judea only as a Roman client. Agrippa was overthrown by his Jewish subjects in 66 and supported the Roman side in the First Jewish–Roman War.

 

[irosie91]

OK. Let me get this straight.

So some dude named Jesus is a bit of a rabble rouser. Often rails against the local and Roman government.

Then one day he gathers up a gang of a dozen thugs and occupies and violently attacks a market while armed with a scourge. And took the coins.

That's called armed robbery in today's parlance.

Today that could get you several years in prison.

Back then, armed robbery could get you crucified.

Can you identify all the times Jesus defied Roman authorities or violated Roman laws?

His problem with the money changers wasn't about the Temple Tax. It was about shortchanging the poor and the pilgrims to the Temple. They were just cheating the poor.

for a "scholar" such as yourself--SURADIE, your statement is EXCRUTIATINGLY IDIOTIC.
There is EXTENSIVE EVIDENCE that the PHARISEES despised the money changers who were lackeys of the ROMAN APPOINTED SADDUCEAN priests-------try to learn a bit of history. The foray into the temple courtyard nails Jesus for what he was-----a ROME HATING PHARISEE. It was an act of SEDITION AGAINST ROME and had nothing to do with short-changing anyone-------well----at least you did not do the usual sunday school bs ---"da high priests were grabbing taxes from da poor"

Jesus committed no crime against Rome. That’s why he bounced around between Herod and Pilate. None could find blame.

try again------he was a fugitive from ROMAN JUSTICE until the Sadducean "HIGH PRIEST" CAIAPHAS handed him over to PONTIUS PILATE. You really want to believe that fairy tale that Pontius washed his hands? You really want to believe that THE JEWS "wanted to kill him"-----but just could not figure out how to do it? "The jews liked" Herod, Pontius Pilate and Caiaphas with equal and reciprocated passion at that time <<<< it is a very suppressed history--------kinda like the suppression of the ongoing body count in the major cities like New York, Portland, Chicago-----etc etc

 

[surada]

OK. Let me get this straight.

So some dude named Jesus is a bit of a rabble rouser. Often rails against the local and Roman government.

Then one day he gathers up a gang of a dozen thugs and occupies and violently attacks a market while armed with a scourge. And took the coins.

That's called armed robbery in today's parlance.

Today that could get you several years in prison.

Back then, armed robbery could get you crucified.

Can you identify all the times Jesus defied Roman authorities or violated Roman laws?

His problem with the money changers wasn't about the Temple Tax. It was about shortchanging the poor and the pilgrims to the Temple. They were just cheating the poor.

for a "scholar" such as yourself--SURADIE, your statement is EXCRUTIATINGLY IDIOTIC.
There is EXTENSIVE EVIDENCE that the PHARISEES despised the money changers who were lackeys of the ROMAN APPOINTED SADDUCEAN priests-------try to learn a bit of history. The foray into the temple courtyard nails Jesus for what he was-----a ROME HATING PHARISEE. It was an act of SEDITION AGAINST ROME and had nothing to do with short-changing anyone-------well----at least you did not do the usual sunday school bs ---"da high priests were grabbing taxes from da poor"

Jesus committed no crime against Rome. That’s why he bounced around between Herod and Pilate. None could find blame.

try again------he was a fugitive from ROMAN JUSTICE until the Sadducean "HIGH PRIEST" CAIAPHAS handed him over to PONTIUS PILATE. You really want to believe that fairy tale that Pontius washed his hands? You really want to believe that THE JEWS "wanted to kill him"-----but just could not figure out how to do it? "The jews liked" Herod, Pontius Pilate and Caiaphas with equal and reciprocated passion at that time <<<< it is a very suppressed history--------kinda like the suppression of the ongoing body count in the major cities like New York, Portland, Chicago-----etc etc

Rome didn't give a fig about Jesus.

 

[norwegen]

OK. Let me get this straight.

So some dude named Jesus is a bit of a rabble rouser. Often rails against the local and Roman government.

Then one day he gathers up a gang of a dozen thugs and occupies and violently attacks a market while armed with a scourge. And took the coins.

That's called armed robbery in today's parlance.

Today that could get you several years in prison.

Back then, armed robbery could get you crucified.

Can you identify all the times Jesus defied Roman authorities or violated Roman laws?

His problem with the money changers wasn't about the Temple Tax. It was about shortchanging the poor and the pilgrims to the Temple. They were just cheating the poor.

for a "scholar" such as yourself--SURADIE, your statement is EXCRUTIATINGLY IDIOTIC.
There is EXTENSIVE EVIDENCE that the PHARISEES despised the money changers who were lackeys of the ROMAN APPOINTED SADDUCEAN priests-------try to learn a bit of history. The foray into the temple courtyard nails Jesus for what he was-----a ROME HATING PHARISEE. It was an act of SEDITION AGAINST ROME and had nothing to do with short-changing anyone-------well----at least you did not do the usual sunday school bs ---"da high priests were grabbing taxes from da poor"

Jesus committed no crime against Rome. That’s why he bounced around between Herod and Pilate. None could find blame.

try again------he was a fugitive from ROMAN JUSTICE until the Sadducean "HIGH PRIEST" CAIAPHAS handed him over to PONTIUS PILATE. You really want to believe that fairy tale that Pontius washed his hands? You really want to believe that THE JEWS "wanted to kill him"-----but just could not figure out how to do it? "The jews liked" Herod, Pontius Pilate and Caiaphas with equal and reciprocated passion at that time <<<< it is a very suppressed history--------kinda like the suppression of the ongoing body count in the major cities like New York, Portland, Chicago-----etc etc

Do you have some extra-biblical literature to verify that he was a fugitive from Roman justice?

If not, perhaps you can show us in the Bible the Roman laws he violated and his flight from Roman authorities. Caiaphas was Jewish.

 

[Weatherman2020]

OK. Let me get this straight.

So some dude named Jesus is a bit of a rabble rouser. Often rails against the local and Roman government.

Then one day he gathers up a gang of a dozen thugs and occupies and violently attacks a market while armed with a scourge. And took the coins.

That's called armed robbery in today's parlance.

Today that could get you several years in prison.

Back then, armed robbery could get you crucified.

Can you identify all the times Jesus defied Roman authorities or violated Roman laws?

His problem with the money changers wasn't about the Temple Tax. It was about shortchanging the poor and the pilgrims to the Temple. They were just cheating the poor.

for a "scholar" such as yourself--SURADIE, your statement is EXCRUTIATINGLY IDIOTIC.
There is EXTENSIVE EVIDENCE that the PHARISEES despised the money changers who were lackeys of the ROMAN APPOINTED SADDUCEAN priests-------try to learn a bit of history. The foray into the temple courtyard nails Jesus for what he was-----a ROME HATING PHARISEE. It was an act of SEDITION AGAINST ROME and had nothing to do with short-changing anyone-------well----at least you did not do the usual sunday school bs ---"da high priests were grabbing taxes from da poor"

Jesus committed no crime against Rome. That’s why he bounced around between Herod and Pilate. None could find blame.

try again------he was a fugitive from ROMAN JUSTICE until the Sadducean "HIGH PRIEST" CAIAPHAS handed him over to PONTIUS PILATE. You really want to believe that fairy tale that Pontius washed his hands? You really want to believe that THE JEWS "wanted to kill him"-----but just could not figure out how to do it? "The jews liked" Herod, Pontius Pilate and Caiaphas with equal and reciprocated passion at that time <<<< it is a very suppressed history--------kinda like the suppression of the ongoing body count in the major cities like New York, Portland, Chicago-----etc etc

Your fantasy only lies in your head. It’s well documented what Pilate said about Jesus, even by non Christian historians of the time.

 

[Lastamender]

Ex-Atheist Lee Strobel Breaks Down 4 Reasons Why Jesus’ Death and Resurrection Are Absolute FACT

Famed author and apologist Lee Strobel recently revealed four reasons why he believes people can have confidence that Jesus truly died and resurrected.

www1.cbn.com

 

[irosie91]

OK. Let me get this straight.

So some dude named Jesus is a bit of a rabble rouser. Often rails against the local and Roman government.

Then one day he gathers up a gang of a dozen thugs and occupies and violently attacks a market while armed with a scourge. And took the coins.

That's called armed robbery in today's parlance.

Today that could get you several years in prison.

Back then, armed robbery could get you crucified.

Can you identify all the times Jesus defied Roman authorities or violated Roman laws?

His problem with the money changers wasn't about the Temple Tax. It was about shortchanging the poor and the pilgrims to the Temple. They were just cheating the poor.

for a "scholar" such as yourself--SURADIE, your statement is EXCRUTIATINGLY IDIOTIC.
There is EXTENSIVE EVIDENCE that the PHARISEES despised the money changers who were lackeys of the ROMAN APPOINTED SADDUCEAN priests-------try to learn a bit of history. The foray into the temple courtyard nails Jesus for what he was-----a ROME HATING PHARISEE. It was an act of SEDITION AGAINST ROME and had nothing to do with short-changing anyone-------well----at least you did not do the usual sunday school bs ---"da high priests were grabbing taxes from da poor"

What? The justice Jesus meted out in a Jewish temple was sedition against Rome?

Have you read the New Testament? Jesus constantly lashed out against the Jews, never against Rome. Jesus came to redeem his people, Israel, and showed little regard for Rome one way or the other. What he hated was the generations of corruption in the temple that his generation of Pharisees and their scribes was perpetuating.

ROFLMAO-------not in the Temple----in the TEMPLE COURT YARD which was opened to gentiles-------Corruption IN THE TEMPLE--by the Pharisees? ------more news for you---the
Temple was CONTROLLED by the SADDUCEES who were Roman shills----actually appointed by the Romans----just as was the EDOMITE
HEROD. The Pharisees despised both. In what sort of Temple corruption could the
PHARISEES actually be involved? Actually
it was the PHARISEE SANHEDRIN (judges) who acquitted Jesus-------they could have killed him even without a trial

 

[irosie91]

OK. Let me get this straight.

So some dude named Jesus is a bit of a rabble rouser. Often rails against the local and Roman government.

Then one day he gathers up a gang of a dozen thugs and occupies and violently attacks a market while armed with a scourge. And took the coins.

That's called armed robbery in today's parlance.

Today that could get you several years in prison.

Back then, armed robbery could get you crucified.

Can you identify all the times Jesus defied Roman authorities or violated Roman laws?

His problem with the money changers wasn't about the Temple Tax. It was about shortchanging the poor and the pilgrims to the Temple. They were just cheating the poor.

for a "scholar" such as yourself--SURADIE, your statement is EXCRUTIATINGLY IDIOTIC.
There is EXTENSIVE EVIDENCE that the PHARISEES despised the money changers who were lackeys of the ROMAN APPOINTED SADDUCEAN priests-------try to learn a bit of history. The foray into the temple courtyard nails Jesus for what he was-----a ROME HATING PHARISEE. It was an act of SEDITION AGAINST ROME and had nothing to do with short-changing anyone-------well----at least you did not do the usual sunday school bs ---"da high priests were grabbing taxes from da poor"

Jesus committed no crime against Rome. That’s why he bounced around between Herod and Pilate. None could find blame.

try again------he was a fugitive from ROMAN JUSTICE until the Sadducean "HIGH PRIEST" CAIAPHAS handed him over to PONTIUS PILATE. You really want to believe that fairy tale that Pontius washed his hands? You really want to believe that THE JEWS "wanted to kill him"-----but just could not figure out how to do it? "The jews liked" Herod, Pontius Pilate and Caiaphas with equal and reciprocated passion at that time <<<< it is a very suppressed history--------kinda like the suppression of the ongoing body count in the major cities like New York, Portland, Chicago-----etc etc

Your fantasy only lies in your head. It’s well documented what Pilate said about Jesus, even non Christian historians of the time.

non-christian historians like Constantine, Paul
and some guy from no-where like "JOHN"----and, of course LUKE. Read some real history.

 

[Weatherman2020]

FUTILITARIANISM:
That feeling when you have to judge a man who is accused of a crime but who doesn’t appear to be guilty but the elites and the mob want him dead so you decide to kill him anyway because it seems like it will pacify the mob and make the problem go away but then he comes back after three days and 2000 years later 2,300,000,000 people are still worshipping him.

 

[irosie91]

OK. Let me get this straight.

So some dude named Jesus is a bit of a rabble rouser. Often rails against the local and Roman government.

Then one day he gathers up a gang of a dozen thugs and occupies and violently attacks a market while armed with a scourge. And took the coins.

That's called armed robbery in today's parlance.

Today that could get you several years in prison.

Back then, armed robbery could get you crucified.

Can you identify all the times Jesus defied Roman authorities or violated Roman laws?

His problem with the money changers wasn't about the Temple Tax. It was about shortchanging the poor and the pilgrims to the Temple. They were just cheating the poor.

for a "scholar" such as yourself--SURADIE, your statement is EXCRUTIATINGLY IDIOTIC.
There is EXTENSIVE EVIDENCE that the PHARISEES despised the money changers who were lackeys of the ROMAN APPOINTED SADDUCEAN priests-------try to learn a bit of history. The foray into the temple courtyard nails Jesus for what he was-----a ROME HATING PHARISEE. It was an act of SEDITION AGAINST ROME and had nothing to do with short-changing anyone-------well----at least you did not do the usual sunday school bs ---"da high priests were grabbing taxes from da poor"

Jesus committed no crime against Rome. That’s why he bounced around between Herod and Pilate. None could find blame.

try again------he was a fugitive from ROMAN JUSTICE until the Sadducean "HIGH PRIEST" CAIAPHAS handed him over to PONTIUS PILATE. You really want to believe that fairy tale that Pontius washed his hands? You really want to believe that THE JEWS "wanted to kill him"-----but just could not figure out how to do it? "The jews liked" Herod, Pontius Pilate and Caiaphas with equal and reciprocated passion at that time <<<< it is a very suppressed history--------kinda like the suppression of the ongoing body count in the major cities like New York, Portland, Chicago-----etc etc

Do you have some extra-biblical literature to verify that he was a fugitive from Roman justice?

If not, perhaps you can show us in the Bible the Roman laws he violated and his flight from Roman authorities. Caiaphas was Jewish.

I can provide the name of a very readable and simple book for your Simple mind---"PASSOVER PLOT" by Hugh Schoenfeld (spelling?) Caiaphas was a SADDUCEAN JEW------despised by the Pharisees as a
"traitor" Jesus was a pharisee. His body was interred in the family crypt of a prominent
Pharisee jew. ------back then ---pharisees and
sadducees were not doing each other favors. Sadducees WERE doing Romans favors
--------sadducees are---well......sorta EXTINCT

 

[Weatherman2020]

OK. Let me get this straight.

So some dude named Jesus is a bit of a rabble rouser. Often rails against the local and Roman government.

Then one day he gathers up a gang of a dozen thugs and occupies and violently attacks a market while armed with a scourge. And took the coins.

That's called armed robbery in today's parlance.

Today that could get you several years in prison.

Back then, armed robbery could get you crucified.

Can you identify all the times Jesus defied Roman authorities or violated Roman laws?

His problem with the money changers wasn't about the Temple Tax. It was about shortchanging the poor and the pilgrims to the Temple. They were just cheating the poor.

for a "scholar" such as yourself--SURADIE, your statement is EXCRUTIATINGLY IDIOTIC.
There is EXTENSIVE EVIDENCE that the PHARISEES despised the money changers who were lackeys of the ROMAN APPOINTED SADDUCEAN priests-------try to learn a bit of history. The foray into the temple courtyard nails Jesus for what he was-----a ROME HATING PHARISEE. It was an act of SEDITION AGAINST ROME and had nothing to do with short-changing anyone-------well----at least you did not do the usual sunday school bs ---"da high priests were grabbing taxes from da poor"

Jesus committed no crime against Rome. That’s why he bounced around between Herod and Pilate. None could find blame.

try again------he was a fugitive from ROMAN JUSTICE until the Sadducean "HIGH PRIEST" CAIAPHAS handed him over to PONTIUS PILATE. You really want to believe that fairy tale that Pontius washed his hands? You really want to believe that THE JEWS "wanted to kill him"-----but just could not figure out how to do it? "The jews liked" Herod, Pontius Pilate and Caiaphas with equal and reciprocated passion at that time <<<< it is a very suppressed history--------kinda like the suppression of the ongoing body count in the major cities like New York, Portland, Chicago-----etc etc

Your fantasy only lies in your head. It’s well documented what Pilate said about Jesus, even non Christian historians of the time.

non-christian historians like Constantine, Paul
and some guy from no-where like "JOHN"----and, of course LUKE. Read some real history.

Feel free to link.
But I’m referring to Tacitus and Joesephus who lived at the time.