House Discharge Petition re Epstein Files Will Pass

[Couchpotato]

Trump's DOJ will never release these files, Trump was best friends with Epstein. His name is all over these files, more than anyone else.

This wasn't an issue until Trump made it an issue during the last campaign. Why would someone who was banging underaged women with a now dead convicted pedophile promise to release files no one was asking to be released if there was even a 1% chance that they might be named in those files? Is it your contention that Trump just forgot he was banging underaged women with arguably the world's most famous pedo?

 

[Couchpotato]

Never was anything to the EPSTEIN case?

I think he's saying there isnt anything to the insinuation that Trump was banging chicks with Epstein. The course of events that have lead us here dont make sense if that were true.

It makes far more sense that the US government was involved in either running or complicit in the running of the pedo ring.

Are you drinking this early in the morning?

 

[buttercup]

Partisanship my ass. All you MAGA MAGGOTS want to do is the Pedo-In-Chief. Congresswoman-Elect Grijavla has she would sign the petition forcing Little Mikey of the Small Johnson to release the EPSTEIN FILES! That must one your so-called "Christian Family Values", protecting ***** Grabbling Pedophiles.

Clearly you haven't read any of my posts if you think I'm MAGA. I'm a liberty-minded conservative who never got on the Trump train. So nice try, but that was hilarious to me. Thanks for the laugh. As for the rest of your incoherent post, I want full transparency and the whole damn thing uncovered, so you're barking up the wrong tree.

 

[odanny]

This wasn't an issue until Trump made it an issue during the last campaign. Why would someone who was banging underaged women with a now dead convicted pedophile promise to release files no one was asking to be released if there was even a 1% chance that they might be named in those files? Is it your contention that Trump just forgot he was banging underaged women with arguably the world's most famous pedo?

It's my contention that Trump not only has always been a liar, but a reckless liar. It is also my contention that you don't understand this, nor will you ever understand this.

 

[Chuz Life]

Clearly you haven't read any of my posts if you think I'm MAGA. I'm a liberty-minded conservative who never got on the Trump train. So nice try, but that was hilarious to me. Thanks for the laugh. As for the rest of your incoherent post, I want full transparency and the whole damn thing uncovered, so you're barking up the wrong tree.

I put that troll on ignore in record time.

 

[OldFlame]

Have you seen the names on the flight logs?

Has anyone filed a lawsuit over their names being released already in the "Flying Lolita" flight logs to Epstein's isle?

That's different than accusing them or rape or child rape without sufficient evidence to indict.

That's exactly what you want, you want the Trump admin to release any name associated with the investigation regardless of whether they can prove their case in court. That's not how the real world/legal world works, and it would be irresponsible to do so.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Trump can order Bondi to release the files.
And fire her if she won't.
Remember how Nixon got rid of the special watergate prosecutor.

Yes, but Bondi would be required to redact the names of victims as well as unindicted alleged perpetrators.

 

[Chuz Life]

That's different than accusing them or rape or child rape without sufficient evidence to indict.

That's exactly what you want, you want the Trump admin to release any name associated with the investigation regardless of whether they can prove their case in court. That's not how the real world/legal world works, and it would be irresponsible to do so.

I never said anything about "accusing" or shaming anyone of raping children. They would be arrested for that.

 

[Chuz Life]

I never said anything about "accusing" or shaming anyone of raping children. They would be arrested for that.

Where are the ******* arrests for that?

 

[postman]

This wasn't an issue until Trump made it an issue during the last campaign. Why would someone who was banging underaged women with a now dead convicted pedophile promise to release files no one was asking to be released if there was even a 1% chance that they might be named in those files? Is it your contention that Trump just forgot he was banging underaged women with arguably the world's most famous pedo?

Why? Trump is reflexive. He says the first thing that comes into his head.
If someone asks for the Epstein files at a rally, he instinctively tells them what they want to hear.

And in that case, it was to release all the Epstein files. Plus the JFK files, the Martin Luther King files, and the RFK files.

 

[OldFlame]

Thank you for saying so.

Obviously, you aren't afraid of becoming a target for your views, either.

Everyone is a target for their views, you posted yourself earlier in this thread that those not agreeing with were compromising defense of children and principles for political expediency. What was that if not a smear?

 

[postman]

Yes, but Bondi would be required to redact the names of victims as well as unindicted alleged perpetrators.

She put 1,000 FBI agents on overtime to search for Trumps name in the Epstein files.
I don't see the job of redacting being more than just additional overtime.

 

[OldFlame]

The victims are still speaking out.

Some feel they should be heard.

Others think they should be ignored or silenced.

Trump is a caring man, obviously. Look at his concern for Erika Kirk, the little boy with cancer (name escapes me,) the families of those shot with him at the PA rally, etc. . .

Yet, he won't even meet with Epstein's victims, even as that would be a smart thing to do, politically AND as a caring human being.

The victims were supposed to release their own list, where is it?

You should really do some background research into some of these women, they're not lily white. I don't think any women involved that were adults when they first met Epstein were victimized at all.

 

[IDIOCRACY]

A Special election won by Dems now gives enough votes to demand the release of ALL the Epstein files

Things could get really interesting

Epstein Files Incoming?!? House Finally Has Magic Number To Demand Docs.

A special election result means the files on the disgraced financier — and onetime close friend of Donald Trump — may now be made public.

www.huffpost.com

When it comes to left thinks & stinks, everything is speculation or what u want it 2 b.

 

[postman]

It's my contention that Trump not only has always been a liar, but a reckless liar. It is also my contention that you don't understand this, nor will you ever understand this.

Trump makes a lot of reflexive promises, and statements. Whatever the first thing to come into his head to stay out of trouble, or to keep the crowd happy.

 

[postman]

The victims were supposed to release their own list, where is it?

You should really do some background research into some of these women, they're not lily white. I don't think any women involved that were adults when they first met Epstein were victimized at all.

I don't know any of them off hand who were of legal age when they first met Epstein.

So that's not really an issue.

 

[OldFlame]

I never said anything about "accusing" or shaming anyone of raping children. They would be arrested for that.

So you're in a catch 22, you want the names released regardless of whether there is enough evidence to get an indictment, but at the same time don't want those people named to be shamed or accused? Wtf? You don't think they will be tried in the court of public opinion and have their lives ruined regardless of whether they are guilty of anything?

 

[OldFlame]

Where are the ******* arrests for that?

THERE'S NOT ENOUGH EVIDENCE TO ARREST ANYONE, WHY CAN'T YOU GET THAT THRU YOUR BRAIN?

 

[postman]

Trump also said that there was no such letter like the one the Wall Street Journal described in the Epstein "Birthday Book".

 

[OldFlame]

I don't know any of them off hand who were of legal age when they first met Epstein.

So that's not really an issue.

Not true at all, you apparently don't know much about the case at all then.