House Discharge Petition re Epstein Files Will Pass

[postman]

Lol! Are you crazy! From Russian collusion to Porn star extortion to documents fraud to phony rape to J6 over-charging to lockup Trump people!!! Obiden people work locksteo to set it all up on-going reported by Whistleblowers. Are you crazy in addition to LW madness?

None of those started in the white house.
Example Russian collusion came from the NSA.

 

[OldFlame]

I am but a citizen.

I agree with and understand your concerns about falsely naming ANYBODY.

When I and others are demanding the transparency that we were promised, we. . . No, only speaking for myself here. . . I expect it to be done responsibly.

Thoroughly.

Independently.

So explain how that's done if you don't have enough evidence to indict?

 

[postman]

Nice words. Chowderhead much? The auto pen lady not credible either at this time.

The "HONORABLE" Obiden years. Russian collusion, J6, phony rape much?

You can mark this down.
Because of Trumps tweets about going after people like Comey, they'll make a case of selective prosecution and walk free.

 

[Delldude]

The judge had the names at the Epstein trial. Thought not credible. Redacted them. Judges are good if they rail-road Trump? Bad if they shelter "thinly" accused

Why were they redacted?

Was it a FOIA request?

 

[Mac-7]

To repeat a previous answer.

A former top White House official blamed ex-Attorney General Merrick Garland for the Biden administration’s failure to do a deep dive into files related to notorious pedophile Jeffrey Epstein.

“Any time I say anything about Epstein, they’re like, ‘why didn’t Joe Biden release the files?’ And this is what I say: ‘Have you met Merrick Garland?’”

“[T]he Joe Biden White House had nothing to do with enforcement on any topic,”
“because of the abuses of the Trump administration, the White House didn’t engage in any particular enforcement matter.”

the Biden White House had “no idea” what — if anything — Garland was doing related to the Epstein files, but that she believes the former attorney general couldn’t tolerate being potentially viewed as biased if he were to open more criminal cases related to Epstein’s underage sex-trafficking endeavors.

Ok we get it

Its biden’s AG who is to blame for not releasing the files when biden was president

But its all trump’s fault when his AG fails to do so

 

[leftwinger]

Why were they redacted?

Was it a FOIA request?

Dershowitz says all were redacted and a gag order issued. One girl found out to be lying?

 

[Seymour Flops]

I have always stood on principle before party. Note my work and posts fighting abortion. Politics is a big part of that, but I will not compromise my defense of children, principles, etc., for political expediency.

Stirring words indeed!

Unfortunately, they ring hollow, since I didn't see any of this from you during the four years that Democrats had complete control of those files and of the FBI and the DOJ.

Obviously, a lot of others here on USMB, would.

Not sure which posters in particular you mean.

Outing and shaming men or women who have not been convicted or even so much as indicted of any wrongdoing against children is not the way to defend children.

If children are your main concern, I'm surprised you haven't posted about the 300,000 children that the previous administration handed over too unvetted "sponsors" who are now refusing to return phone calls.

 

[Chuz Life]

So explain how that's done if you don't have enough evidence to indict?

Again, that is for the authorities who promised to release the ******* information to figure out.

 

[OldFlame]

Again, that is for the authorities who promised to release the ******* information to figure out.

Exactly, you don't know how it's responsibly done because there isn't a way to do it responsibly. There is nothing to 'figure out', if you don't have the evidence to indict, you don't release their name to the public. You're passing the buck and demanding something that isn't possible.

 

[postman]

Why were they redacted?

Was it a FOIA request?

The FOIA does not apply to the Judicial Branch (Courts) or the Legislative Branch (Congress). It also does not apply to state and local governments.

 

[Delldude]

The FOIA does not apply to the Judicial Branch (Courts) or the Legislative Branch (Congress). It also does not apply to state and local governments.

That's why I asked, Gene, I wasn't sure if it was Federal or State court.

Thanks

 

[postman]

Ok we get it

Its biden’s AG who is to blame for not releasing the files when biden was president

But its all trump’s fault when his AG fails to do so

The difference is that Trump on the campaign trail said he would release all of the Epstein files.

Since Trump is using the DOJ as his personal lawyers, Trump can tell the DOJ exactly what to do.

Like when Trump told the DOJ to stop investigating the border Czars $50,000 bribe.

Or to start investigating Adam Schiff and Leticia James.

 

[leftwinger]

Again, that is for the authorities who promised to release the ******* information to figure out.

Parts 1,2 were released as promised. Just because no names? Or you don't like it?

 

[Chuz Life]

Stirring words indeed!

Unfortunately, they ring hollow, since I didn't see any of this from you during the four years that Democrats had complete control of those files and of the FBI and the DOJ.


Not sure which posters in particular you mean.

Outing and shaming men or women who have not been convicted or even so much as indicted of any wrongdoing against children is not the way to defend children.

If children are your main concern, I'm surprised you haven't posted about the 300,000 children that the previous administration handed over too unvetted "sponsors" who are now refusing to return phone calls.

I have been consistent in my views, even back when the full weight of the Epstein story hadn't hit me yet.

Post in thread 'Snyder in heap big trouble...on Epstein's sex trafficking list'

Jul 16, 2020

He will be pardoned. . .

If Sniffy gets in, that is.

Biden young girls - Bing

Intelligent search from Bing makes it easier to quickly find what you’re looking for and rewards you.

www.bing.com

What an idiotic comment. No one had a closer relationship in the 90s and eary 00s to Epstein than Trump himself. I wonder if Maxwell has tapes of Trump's rape of the 14 year old while at an Epstein party?

Anyone who has anything to to do with Epstein and his perversions should get the book thrown at them.

Lat I checked, rape is an impeachable offense.

Isn't it?

• Chuz Life

I was not here on USMB for a long time during the majority of the scandal, due to family health issues and other responsibilities. But all of my comments are searchable here and on X, where I have maintained my position in defense of children, especially.

https://x.com/search?q=from%3AChuz_Life%20children&src=typed_query

 

[Mac-7]

The difference is that Trump on the campaign trail said he would release all of the Epstein files.

Since Trump is using the DOJ as his personal lawyers, Trump can tell the DOJ exactly what to do.

Like when Trump told the DOJ to stop investigating the border Czars $50,000 bribe.

Or to start investigating Adam Schiff and Leticia James.

So, sometimes you want trump to be a dictator and sometimes you dont?

 

[Dorian Mode]

Again, that is for the authorities who promised to release the ******* information to figure out.

I think a lot of Epstein stuff has been released. The only person to refuse releasing known info was an Obama appointed judge. Why aren't you upset about that? My guess here is that you just want them to keep releasing stuff until you finally hear what you want to hear, that Trump is guilty. It seems to me you are assuming Trump is guilty and are demanding him to prove his innocence. Not cool. You sound like a democrap.

 

[ThisIsMe]

A Special election won by Dems now gives enough votes to demand the release of ALL the Epstein files

Things could get really interesting

Epstein Files Incoming?!? House Finally Has Magic Number To Demand Docs.

A special election result means the files on the disgraced financier — and onetime close friend of Donald Trump — may now be made public.

www.huffpost.com

I support the release of the files. Let's get it out there. Now that they have the ability, there should be no delay. So, let's see how long, or if the dems even vote for their release.

 

[Chuz Life]

Exactly, you don't know how it's responsibly done because there isn't a way to do it responsibly. There is nothing to 'figure out', if you don't have the evidence to indict, you don't release their name to the public. You're passing the buck and demanding something that isn't possible.

Have you seen the names on the flight logs?

Has anyone filed a lawsuit over their names being released already in the "Flying Lolita" flight logs to Epstein's isle?

 

[leftwinger]

I think a lot of Epstein stuff has been released. The only person to refuse releasing known info was an Obama appointed judge. Why aren't you upset about that? My guess here is that you just want them to keep releasing stuff until you finally hear what you want to hear, that Trump is guilty. It seems to me you are assuming Trump is guilty and are demanding him to prove his innocence. Not cool. You sound like a democrap.

This crap of phony middlers or actual Trump supporters? Attacking him every day on every little issue grows tiring. I am angered, I fight back. 04NOV2020 began a war, not by me, by them.

Silent on Obiden huge corrupt issues. But now these posters are honorable and demand perfection down to the mili-meter? Huh?

 

[Chuz Life]

I think a lot of Epstein stuff has been released. The only person to refuse releasing known info was an Obama appointed judge. Why aren't you upset about that? My guess here is that you just want them to keep releasing stuff until you finally hear what you want to hear, that Trump is guilty. It seems to me you are assuming Trump is guilty and are demanding him to prove his innocence. Not cool. You sound like a democrap.

You couldn't be more wrong.

I would very much like to see an independent council investigate the whole damn thing and the trafficking of the girls is but a small part of it.

I want to know where the "follow the ******* money" leads, what foreign governments were involved, what their roles were, all of it.

And I don't give a flying **** who is implicated on either side.