OldFlame
Diamond Member
- Aug 5, 2020
- 12,619
- 10,221
- 2,138
Did I claim she was murdered?
What are you implying then?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Did I claim she was murdered?
Yet they still drag their feet.
That makes sense.
I don't.Yes it is, look up their press conference, every media outlet reported it at the beginning of September. And their victim spokesperson was a woman that met Epstein when she was 21, he paid her handsomely, paid for her to go to a prestigious school in New York and got her into the top modeling agencies. Yet she claims he raped her every time she visited him in his office, hoping each time she went it would have a different outcome.They should have never chosen her to speak for them.
How do you prove that anyone was 'with them' outside of video?
And you still think that I am only in the interest of proving rape and not having any ******* concerns about the larger national security interests or implications.
The release being voted on, try to keep up.Drag their feet with what?
I don't.
They do.
That's it.
These women were not even given access to their own ******* records to KNOW who they were with, in some cases.
here's a link to my earlier post on the warrant to remove.I am but a citizen.
I agree with and understand your concerns about falsely naming ANYBODY.
When I and others are demanding the transparency that we were promised, we. . . No, only speaking for myself here. . . I expect it to be done responsibly.
Thoroughly.
Independently.
That's a difference without a distinction, all of what I have said would apply to that as well. I asked you earlier if you would want them fired simple for visiting Epstein's island, so we've been here already.
The release being voted on, try to keep up.
They were offered an opportunity to go after the people after the conviction. Most chose not to. A few did.The victims are still speaking out.
Some feel they should be heard.
Yet, he won't even meet with Epstein's victims, even as that would be a smart thing to do, politically AND as a caring human being.
Do you think you have any chance of discouraging my support for more transparency and a full release of the evidence? Including the financial and foreign government (if any) involvement?
If not, why then are you hanging on my every word?

which is what exactly?And you still think that I am only in the interest of proving rape and not having any ******* concerns about the larger national security interests or implications.
That's for a jury to decide.Were they paid? Were they forced?
Oh, no need to explain, sir!If I can clarify for the record here, I am/ was a late comer to the who Epstein debacle.
If true, you must have heaped praise on Donald Trump for the USSC nominations that allowed the Dobbs decision.The abortion issues has always been my first priority. Most who know me, would agree, that's to a fault.
Her stories add up to tragic melodrama of a troubled young woman plagued by an unbelievably wide variety of abusive men, from a never named family friend, to an international pimp, to a real life Prince and a collection of well known public figures, and finally her own husband, her erstwhile savior.The very first I time I ever heard of Epstein, it was easy to brush off as the left was trying to connect Trump to Epstein (guilt by association) thing - and I recall it having something to do with Epstein's connection to who I now know was Virginia Giuffre and allegations against Prince Andrew. . . He was busted, settled, lost all his military honors, etc. . .
Good. I don't have much interest in the "royals" anyway.
So, my interest never peaked further than that, until I catch the news story that Virginia Giuffre was in a bus crash and the article pointed her out as the girl that accused Prince Andrew. . .
The bus story was just not sounding right to me, she said she was dying in a social media post??? Liver something and I thought. . . maybe she's just chasing sympathy, money or both.
Around the same time, as I recall, the name Epstein came up in questions, press releases, etc.
Still no real interest but I do remember promises for more transparency, if elected.
Then it was reported that Virginia Giuffre was dead.
And that is when I started to realize how things were not adding up, promises not being kept, and so on.
Have you caught any of the contradictions in that article?here's a link to my earlier post on the warrant to remove.
![]()
Evidence from Jeffrey Epstein's safe 'went missing' after FBI raid, court hears in Ghislaine Maxwell trial
Agent Kelly Maguire testified that CDs and hard drives disappeared as authorities waited on a warrant to seize themwww.telegraph.co.uk
I certainly praise Trump for his court appointees.Oh, no need to explain, sir!
Every Democrat and "not Democrat" on this forum is a late comer to this issue, having shown not a whit of interest in demanding the release of files under the Autopen administration.
You owe no one an explanation. Besides, proffering excuses is a sign of a guilty conscience.
If true, you must have heaped praise on Donald Trump for the USSC nominations that allowed the Dobbs decision.
Her stories add up to tragic melodrama of a troubled young woman plagued by an unbelievably wide variety of abusive men, from a never named family friend, to an international pimp, to a real life Prince and a collection of well known public figures, and finally her own husband, her erstwhile savior.
Only the inclusion of time-travelling historical figures, perhaps Thomas Jefferson, Lincoln and Davis, Teddy Roosevelt, or Joe Stalin could have made her tale more sensational.
That's Great!Chuz Life , here this is fact
That's Great!
Where did you get that I am after dirt on Trump himself?
The coolest thing in the world (for me) would be if they finally get everything released and trump is completely exonerated, which is what I expected when he first mentioned "releasing the files."
take a listen to them, I have so many questions of these women. #1 question, what is they want? #2, don't they have the names of the men they were with? Why? They also said no congress folks have reached out to them. I thought Massie did?Oh, no need to explain, sir!
Every Democrat and "not Democrat" on this forum is a late comer to this issue, having shown not a whit of interest in demanding the release of files under the Autopen administration.
You owe no one an explanation. Besides, proffering excuses is a sign of a guilty conscience.
If true, you must have heaped praise on Donald Trump for the USSC nominations that allowed the Dobbs decision.
Her stories add up to tragic melodrama of a troubled young woman plagued by an unbelievably wide variety of abusive men, from a never named family friend, to an international pimp, to a real life Prince and a collection of well known public figures, and finally her own husband, her erstwhile savior.
Only the inclusion of time-travelling historical figures, perhaps Thomas Jefferson, Lincoln and Davis, Teddy Roosevelt, or Joe Stalin could have made her tale more sensational.