House Discharge Petition re Epstein Files Will Pass

Yes it is, look up their press conference, every media outlet reported it at the beginning of September. And their victim spokesperson was a woman that met Epstein when she was 21, he paid her handsomely, paid for her to go to a prestigious school in New York and got her into the top modeling agencies. Yet she claims he raped her every time she visited him in his office, hoping each time she went it would have a different outcome. :rolleyes: They should have never chosen her to speak for them.

How do you prove that anyone was 'with them' outside of video?
I don't.

They do.

That's it.

These women were not even given access to their own ******* records to KNOW who they were with, in some cases.
 
And you still think that I am only in the interest of proving rape and not having any ******* concerns about the larger national security interests or implications.

That's a difference without a distinction, all of what I have said would apply to that as well. I asked you earlier if you would want them fired simple for visiting Epstein's island, so we've been here already.
 
I don't.

They do.

That's it.

These women were not even given access to their own ******* records to KNOW who they were with, in some cases.

Were they paid? Were they forced?
 
I am but a citizen.

I agree with and understand your concerns about falsely naming ANYBODY.

When I and others are demanding the transparency that we were promised, we. . . No, only speaking for myself here. . . I expect it to be done responsibly.

Thoroughly.

Independently.
here's a link to my earlier post on the warrant to remove.

 
That's a difference without a distinction, all of what I have said would apply to that as well. I asked you earlier if you would want them fired simple for visiting Epstein's island, so we've been here already.

Do you think you have any chance of discouraging my support for more transparency and a full release of the evidence? Including the financial and foreign government (if any) involvement?

If not, why then are you hanging on my every word?
 
The release being voted on, try to keep up.

What are they supposed to release? We're all the way back at the beginning again, just admit you want heads to roll regardless of whether there is sufficient evidence or not. That's what you clearly want.
 
The victims are still speaking out.

Some feel they should be heard.
They were offered an opportunity to go after the people after the conviction. Most chose not to. A few did.

That group was on one of the left media channels and were asked carte blanche if they knew of or ever saw Trump doing anything, the unanimous reply was no.

Yet, he won't even meet with Epstein's victims, even as that would be a smart thing to do, politically AND as a caring human being.

He has nothing to do with their situation.

It would be a terribly stupid thing to do.
 
Do you think you have any chance of discouraging my support for more transparency and a full release of the evidence? Including the financial and foreign government (if any) involvement?

If not, why then are you hanging on my every word?

No, I know very well that you want people hung from the nearest tree without any sufficient evidence to convict them in a court of law, not the American way. You will also not convince me that releasing names of people without sufficient evidence to indict is the moral or responsible thing to do. :dunno:
 
And you still think that I am only in the interest of proving rape and not having any ******* concerns about the larger national security interests or implications.
which is what exactly?
 
If I can clarify for the record here, I am/ was a late comer to the who Epstein debacle.
Oh, no need to explain, sir!

Every Democrat and "not Democrat" on this forum is a late comer to this issue, having shown not a whit of interest in demanding the release of files under the Autopen administration.

You owe no one an explanation. Besides, proffering excuses is a sign of a guilty conscience.
The abortion issues has always been my first priority. Most who know me, would agree, that's to a fault.
If true, you must have heaped praise on Donald Trump for the USSC nominations that allowed the Dobbs decision.
The very first I time I ever heard of Epstein, it was easy to brush off as the left was trying to connect Trump to Epstein (guilt by association) thing - and I recall it having something to do with Epstein's connection to who I now know was Virginia Giuffre and allegations against Prince Andrew. . . He was busted, settled, lost all his military honors, etc. . .

Good. I don't have much interest in the "royals" anyway.

So, my interest never peaked further than that, until I catch the news story that Virginia Giuffre was in a bus crash and the article pointed her out as the girl that accused Prince Andrew. . .

The bus story was just not sounding right to me, she said she was dying in a social media post??? Liver something and I thought. . . maybe she's just chasing sympathy, money or both.

Around the same time, as I recall, the name Epstein came up in questions, press releases, etc.

Still no real interest but I do remember promises for more transparency, if elected.

Then it was reported that Virginia Giuffre was dead.

And that is when I started to realize how things were not adding up, promises not being kept, and so on.
Her stories add up to tragic melodrama of a troubled young woman plagued by an unbelievably wide variety of abusive men, from a never named family friend, to an international pimp, to a real life Prince and a collection of well known public figures, and finally her own husband, her erstwhile savior.

Only the inclusion of time-travelling historical figures, perhaps Thomas Jefferson, Lincoln and Davis, Teddy Roosevelt, or Joe Stalin could have made her tale more sensational.
 
Last edited:
15th post
Oh, no need to explain, sir!

Every Democrat and "not Democrat" on this forum is a late comer to this issue, having shown not a whit of interest in demanding the release of files under the Autopen administration.

You owe no one an explanation. Besides, proffering excuses is a sign of a guilty conscience.

If true, you must have heaped praise on Donald Trump for the USSC nominations that allowed the Dobbs decision.

Her stories add up to tragic melodrama of a troubled young woman plagued by an unbelievably wide variety of abusive men, from a never named family friend, to an international pimp, to a real life Prince and a collection of well known public figures, and finally her own husband, her erstwhile savior.

Only the inclusion of time-travelling historical figures, perhaps Thomas Jefferson, Lincoln and Davis, Teddy Roosevelt, or Joe Stalin could have made her tale more sensational.
I certainly praise Trump for his court appointees.

That is, I don't fault Trump for any of the SCOTUS fuckups after they were appointed.

That shit's on them.

 
Chuz Life , here this is fact
That's Great!

Where did you get that I am after dirt on Trump himself?

The coolest thing in the world (for me) would be if they finally get everything released and trump is completely exonerated, which is what I expected when he first mentioned "releasing the files."
 
Last edited:
That's Great!

Where did you get that I am after dirt on Trump himself?

The coolest thing in the world (for me) would be if they finally get everything released and trump is completely exonerated, which is what I expected when he first mentioned "releasing the files."


go to 21:00 of the video.
 
Oh, no need to explain, sir!

Every Democrat and "not Democrat" on this forum is a late comer to this issue, having shown not a whit of interest in demanding the release of files under the Autopen administration.

You owe no one an explanation. Besides, proffering excuses is a sign of a guilty conscience.

If true, you must have heaped praise on Donald Trump for the USSC nominations that allowed the Dobbs decision.

Her stories add up to tragic melodrama of a troubled young woman plagued by an unbelievably wide variety of abusive men, from a never named family friend, to an international pimp, to a real life Prince and a collection of well known public figures, and finally her own husband, her erstwhile savior.

Only the inclusion of time-travelling historical figures, perhaps Thomas Jefferson, Lincoln and Davis, Teddy Roosevelt, or Joe Stalin could have made her tale more sensational.
take a listen to them, I have so many questions of these women. #1 question, what is they want? #2, don't they have the names of the men they were with? Why? They also said no congress folks have reached out to them. I thought Massie did?

 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom