“His Socialism is Too Far Left to Deal With”..

Capitalist

Jeffersonian Liberal
May 22, 2010
835
210
78
(Daily Beast)- In an exclusive interview with The Daily Beast, the Fox News chief says Obama thinks differently from most Americans, defends Murdoch’s GOP donations, and admits Beck sometimes goes too far.
In the media world, as in politics, having a high-profile target can be a very good thing.
The age of Obama has provided a ratings boost for Fox News as its loudest personalities have relished the opportunity to play offense. Critics, of course, view Fox as an unabashed cheerleader for the Republican Party, an evil media empire spewing propaganda and misinformation at a gullible audience.
But Roger Ailes says his network is just reflecting reality when it comes to the White House.
“The president has not been very successful,” the Fox News chairman says in a lengthy interview. “He just got kicked from Mumbai to South Korea, and he came home and attacked Republicans for it. He had to be told by the French and the Germans that his socialism was too far left for them to deal with.”
The 70-year-old Ailes, dressed in a lavender shirt and tie, goes on in this vein, saying the network isn’t singling out Obama for criticism but that its style “tends to be more direct” in challenging presidents. Then he offers this observation about Obama:
“He just has a different belief system than most Americans.”
That seems a rather loaded phrase—different belief system—even if you strongly disagree with most of Obama’s policies. It fits the view of those who are trying to paint the president as being outside the mainstream. But from the big second-floor office at Fox’s Midtown Manhattan headquarters, it’s the rest of the media that are using a distorted lens.
“He’s had 3,000 press secretaries since he got into office,” Ailes says of Obama, but these days, “he’s making it harder for the press to make him look good… When the press falls in love, they fall in love hard. They’re like teenagers in love. It’s like the old Frankie Lymon song, ‘Why Do Fools Fall in Love?’”
Rest here>>>
 
Hahahahaha. Wow, the head of Faux Noose think ill of Preisdent Obama and calls him the same names the reich-wingers called Roosevelt. I'm Shocked.
 
Hahahahaha. Wow, the head of Faux Noose think ill of Preisdent Obama and calls him the same names the reich-wingers called Roosevelt. I'm Shocked.
So you think his trip was successful?
For some reason, that doesn't surprise me.
 
Hahahahaha. Wow, the head of Faux Noose think ill of Preisdent Obama and calls him the same names the reich-wingers called Roosevelt. I'm Shocked.
So you think his trip was successful?
For some reason, that doesn't surprise me.

He was all but openly laughed at on his trip.

The shine is off the shoes, the world knows he is not an actual leader. When you fail to lead the people that elected you to lead, people notice.
 
So you think his trip was successful?
For some reason, that doesn't surprise me.

It was unsucecssful, certainly, but why? It seems to me, it was unsuccessful because the world's leaders are fearful of a currency war developing, not because of Obama's "socialism".
 
Hahahahaha. Wow, the head of Faux Noose think ill of Preisdent Obama and calls him the same names the reich-wingers called Roosevelt. I'm Shocked.
Yeah....totally-unexpected..... :rolleyes:

Ailes political work has included:

* working as a media adviser to Richard M. Nixon Presidential Campaign in 1967-68;
* working as a consultant in 1984 to Ronald Reagan;
* working on George H. W. Bush's 1988 Presidential campaign.
 
So you think his trip was successful?
For some reason, that doesn't surprise me.

It was unsucecssful, certainly, but why? It seems to me, it was unsuccessful because the world's leaders are fearful of a currency war developing, not because of Obama's "socialism".

So you think the currency war has nothing to do with his socialism?
 
Hahahahaha. Wow, the head of Faux Noose think ill of Preisdent Obama and calls him the same names the reich-wingers called Roosevelt. I'm Shocked.
So you think his trip was successful?
For some reason, that doesn't surprise me.

I went over my post word by word and nope, I don't see where I said I though his his trip was a success. Nice try at putting words in my mouth. Another typical right-wing tactic.

What I did imply was that the opposition party of No is using the same tactic they used against President Roosevelt.
 
Hahahahaha. Wow, the head of Faux Noose think ill of Preisdent Obama and calls him the same names the reich-wingers called Roosevelt. I'm Shocked.
So you think his trip was successful?
For some reason, that doesn't surprise me.

I went over my post word by word and nope, I don't see where I said I though his his trip was a success. Nice try at putting words in my mouth. Another typical right-wing tactic.

What I did imply was that the opposition party of No is using the same tactic they used against President Roosevelt.

Nice try at putting me into your worthless political name box, "typical right-wing".
You have a distinct inability to make crucial distinctions.
The other thing you say is "reich-wingers". This shows me that you don't know and you don't know, that you don't know. The word Reich is synonymous with the Nazis who have more in common with fellow socialist Obowmao.
Unbelievable, wrong and foolish.
 
I love it when people say Obama is too far left. :lol:
Why do you think the far left is not happy with him?
 
It is perplexing to me that Obama gets labeled "too far left". Me and my liberal friends are appalled at his first two years in office and not because he's "too far left", "left", or "anywhere near left". It seems to me he is Republican Lite if anything. He panders to the Republicans, the corporations, and takes "consensus building" to a ridiculous extreme. How is any of that "too far left"?
 
It is perplexing to me that Obama gets labeled "too far left". Me and my liberal friends are appalled at his first two years in office and not because he's "too far left", "left", or "anywhere near left". It seems to me he is Republican Lite if anything. He panders to the Republicans, the corporations, and takes "consensus building" to a ridiculous extreme. How is any of that "too far left"?
I would say that forcing citizens to buy health insurance and confiscating private property for redistribution to those that have not earned it, is a socialist/progressive notion.
 
So you think his trip was successful?
For some reason, that doesn't surprise me.

I went over my post word by word and nope, I don't see where I said I though his his trip was a success. Nice try at putting words in my mouth. Another typical right-wing tactic.

What I did imply was that the opposition party of No is using the same tactic they used against President Roosevelt.

Nice try at putting me into your worthless political name box, "typical right-wing".
You have a distinct inability to make crucial distinctions.
The other thing you say is "reich-wingers". This shows me that you don't know and you don't know, that you don't know. The word Reich is synonymous with the Nazis who have more in common with fellow socialist Obowmao.
Unbelievable, wrong and foolish.

You put yourself in the box by using such tatics not me. Was it also your feelings that Reich is synonomous with Nazi?

Reich (pronounced /ˈraɪk/; German: [ˈʁaɪç]) is a German word cognate with the English rich, but used most often to designate an empire, realm, or nation.
 
I went over my post word by word and nope, I don't see where I said I though his his trip was a success. Nice try at putting words in my mouth. Another typical right-wing tactic.

What I did imply was that the opposition party of No is using the same tactic they used against President Roosevelt.

Nice try at putting me into your worthless political name box, "typical right-wing".
You have a distinct inability to make crucial distinctions.
The other thing you say is "reich-wingers". This shows me that you don't know and you don't know, that you don't know. The word Reich is synonymous with the Nazis who have more in common with fellow socialist Obowmao.
Unbelievable, wrong and foolish.

You put yourself in the box by using such tatics not me. Was it also your feelings that Reich is synonomous with Nazi?

Reich (pronounced /ˈraɪk/; German: [ˈʁaɪç]) is a German word cognate with the English rich, but used most often to designate an empire, realm, or nation.

Good spin, but not good enough........
Actually, very transparent.
 
Last edited:
It is perplexing to me that Obama gets labeled "too far left". Me and my liberal friends are appalled at his first two years in office and not because he's "too far left", "left", or "anywhere near left". It seems to me he is Republican Lite if anything. He panders to the Republicans, the corporations, and takes "consensus building" to a ridiculous extreme. How is any of that "too far left"?
I would say that forcing citizens to buy health insurance and confiscating private property for redistribution to those that have not earned it, is a socialist/progressive notion.

Mandating insurance sounds alot like corporate fascism. The public option would have been more socialistic. Western society is socialist. We have been redistributing funds through the progressive tax system for, well since they started income taxes.
 
It is perplexing to me that Obama gets labeled "too far left". Me and my liberal friends are appalled at his first two years in office and not because he's "too far left", "left", or "anywhere near left". It seems to me he is Republican Lite if anything. He panders to the Republicans, the corporations, and takes "consensus building" to a ridiculous extreme. How is any of that "too far left"?
I would say that forcing citizens to buy health insurance and confiscating private property for redistribution to those that have not earned it, is a socialist/progressive notion.

Mandating insurance sounds alot like corporate fascism. The public option would have been more socialistic. Western society is socialist. We have been redistributing funds through the progressive tax system for, well since they started income taxes.
We have now run out of other peoples money.
The denial of individual property rights for some collective good is evil and puts everyone's property rights in jeopardy. The idea that a mans life and his work do not belong to him is slavery.
Sorry, I vote for freedom.
 

Forum List

Back
Top