colfax_m
Diamond Member
- Nov 18, 2019
- 38,988
- 14,843
- 1,465
It’s noted in the Mueller report. Are you assuming it didn’t happen?For starters the DNC gave them all their forensic data which includes their logs, but more importantly, the ISPs keep logs as well.Absolutely not. These “experts” made fundamental mistakes in their analysis by assuming the transfer they were evaluating was a transfer from the DNC servers to Romania. This is littered with unfounded assumptions, not the least of which is evidence that the data was transferred off the servers over a week before the transfer they were analyzing.I have no doubt Russia tried, but several cyber experts have said the speed of the download could not have been accomplished via an internet connection. That indicated an inside job.
The US government has access to data logs showing when and where the data went from the DNC servers.
Really, how did they get the logs when the DNC refused access to their servers?
.
You don’t think that analyzing the logs requires the physical hardware, do you? The evidence is data which can be copied and distributed that way.
So you're assuming that happened, where's your evidence?
.
Really, the FBI said they trusted the work of Crowdstrike and weren't allowed to confirm their results because they were denied access.
.
Yes, and the reason they were “denied access” only applies to having physical access to their hardware, which is both disruptive to the operations of the DNC at a critical time in the election and of minimal benefit to the FBI.
The FBI does say they trust Crowdstrike because they’ve worked with them before and because they’re well respected in the field.
But Crowdstrike was very far from the only source of information used to attribute the source of the hack.