colfax_m
Diamond Member
- Nov 18, 2019
- 38,988
- 14,843
- 1,465
They did nothing of the sort. You’re misinterpreting the testimony.The DNC. So what? The future of Crowdstrike’s business depends on their credibility and they wouldn’t sacrifice their viability as a company in order to appease a single client.First show me why that was necessary to reach that conclusion.Fascinating. Show me the bipartisan intelligence report showing that Russia wasn’t behind the DNC attack.Ha! Obama’s intelligence agencies were criticized for that reason after they put out intelligence indicating Russia was behind DNC hacks and election interference because those things were not true.
Four years later and numerous intelligence reports from Republicans and Democrats verifying that result and the Dem faithful still can’t bring themselves to admit they were wrong
You won’t because it doesn’t exist.
Show what federal agency examined the DNC servers and came to that conclusion.
.
Independent eyes, the DNC had a vested interest in making the claim.
.
Crowdstrike doesn’t have a vested interest. And the US law enforcement and intelligence community provided plenty of independent eyes to the hack.
So I still haven’t heard why it was necessary to have the physical hardware to reach a conclusion.
Who employed Crowdstrike?
.
Still haven’t heard why it was necessary to have the physical hardware to reach a conclusion.
Yet they put out contradictory information, one to the public and FBI and one to congress. Their legitimacy is already in question.
.