Greenland says they don't want to join America

I care for the well-being of America with its people. I am here too. Yet America taking Greenland will be an act of aggression, just in the same way as any other acts of aggression among nations, such as Germany taking Poland, or Israel taking land separate from it of the Palestinian people. California, the state I am in, should threaten to leave the US if America will still do it, and I think other countries should go to war against America in response for such aggression and for defense of Greenland. Greenland does not belong to the US and that is not the way to change that.

"Greenland does not belong to the US"

Of course not, that's why we have to go aggressively take it.
If it already belonged to us, we wouldn't have to take it.

Catch on?

Derp.
 
They sure as hell implied it, based on the "one way or the other" line. That's distinctly implying force, unless you're totally ignorant. Invasion is an insane negotiation tactic when it comes to discussing things with your allies. Annexing Greenland was already insane, but we seem to have forgotten that already.


Your a cultist because your narrative can't be disproven no matter what Trump says. He says batshit crazy things and you just find any way possible to bend reality to make it look okay.

You asked when he talked about invading Greenland and I showed you. Then you started making excuses.

Trump just floods the zone with shit. That's his power.
If it costs 50 billion dollars a year to defend it, then give is that money.
 
Don’t worry so much about Greenland. He’s pushing for a war with Venezuela now.

All that oil doncha know…
 
Don’t worry so much about Greenland. He’s pushing for a war with Venezuela now.

All that oil doncha know…
For a hot minute, they convinced themselves Greenland was worth a lot because of minerals, before discovering it was insanely expensive and unprofitable.
 
Don’t worry so much about Greenland. He’s pushing for a war with Venezuela now.

All that oil doncha know…
The planet will be better with scorched earth, and it is coming then living with your guy's parasitic behaviors costing us much of our wealth. The star trek good of the many over the few or the one.
 
The planet will be better with scorched earth, and it is coming then living with your guy's parasitic behaviors costing us much of our wealth. The star trek good of the many over the few or the one.
You are seriously nutz
 
It's definitely implying force. Don't be delusional.
No it isnt. Can you seriously not see that you are just inferring that meaning because of who said it?
Sure you would have. Why don't you criticize him for refusing to rule it out?
Would that make you feel better? Here's what I would criticize about Trump as it relates to this particular interview and his interactions in general many times. He doesn't know when to use the "tough guy" rhetoric and often when the person interviewing him is setting the obvious trap which is what this was.
He first implied and then refused to rule it out. That's insane and Trump knows exactly what he's doing.

I will say this. Trump is at the same time the dumbest person on the planet and this insane mastermind at the same time to you isnt he?
 
No it isnt. Can you seriously not see that you are just inferring that meaning because of who said it?
It's even more clear when you consider who said it. Trump has a history of threatening to take things by force. Remember when he said we should take Iraq's oil by force?
Would that make you feel better? Here's what I would criticize about Trump as it relates to this particular interview and his interactions in general many times. He doesn't know when to use the "tough guy" rhetoric and often when the person interviewing him is setting the obvious trap which is what this was.
It wasn't an "obvious trap". There's no trap about asking a straightforward question. Why would you consider it a "trap"?
I will say this. Trump is at the same time the dumbest person on the planet and this insane mastermind at the same time to you isnt he?
Trump is very good at manipulating his cult and the media. He's not very good at much else.
 
No it isnt. Can you seriously not see that you are just inferring that meaning because of who said it?

Would that make you feel better? Here's what I would criticize about Trump as it relates to this particular interview and his interactions in general many times. He doesn't know when to use the "tough guy" rhetoric and often when the person interviewing him is setting the obvious trap which is what this was.


I will say this. Trump is at the same time the dumbest person on the planet and this insane mastermind at the same time to you isnt he?
Trump threatened Greenland
 
It's even more clear when you consider who said it. Trump has a history of threatening to take things by force. Remember when he said we should take Iraq's oil by force?
And there we have it. It's 100% who said it not what was said. You only read "the US is going to invade Greenland" from "one way or another" (especially when all that's been talked about up to that point is either purchasing Greenland or bringing them in as a protectorate) is if you want it to mean that. But you hack away.
It wasn't an "obvious trap". There's no trap about asking a straightforward question. Why would you consider it a "trap"?
It was a question asked to illicit a particular sound byte. Which they got so bully for them I guess. Doesn't mean that's not what was happening.
Trump is very good at manipulating his cult and the media. He's not very good at much else.

Trump is good on the campaign trail.. He's been good at identifying 80/20 issues and getting on the 80 side of them. He's been good at triggering people like you.

He's been bad at instituting policy to fix the 80/20 issues he's on the right side of.

He's spends too much time triggering people like you.
 
15th post
And there we have it. It's 100% who said it not what was said. You only read "the US is going to invade Greenland" from "one way or another" (especially when all that's been talked about up to that point is either purchasing Greenland or bringing them in as a protectorate) is if you want it to mean that. But you hack away.
You're acting irrationally. He said "one way or another" which based on his prior comments about taking things by force, definitely implies force. So a reporter asked him and he replied with a batshit crazy statement about not ruling out force.

Sorry you can't admit that.
It was a question asked to illicit a particular sound byte. Which they got so bully for them I guess. Doesn't mean that's not what was happening.
You don't think Trump understood the question? He could have just said we aren't going to invade Greenland. Why wouldn't he just say the normal, sane thing?
Trump is good on the campaign trail.. He's been good at identifying 80/20 issues and getting on the 80 side of them. He's been good at triggering people like you.
Yes, he's an excellent troll. I don't really respect trolls.

As for 80/20 issues, I don't think annexing Greenland is the 80 side.
He's been bad at instituting policy to fix the 80/20 issues he's on the right side of.

He's spends too much time triggering people like you.
His approval on the handling of most issues is far from 80/20.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom