Dana7360
Diamond Member
- Aug 6, 2014
- 15,147
- 13,596
- 2,405
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I'm good with people taking people to task for not voting for a bill, while trying to take credit for it.See?
They already are attempting to take credit for this "pork-filled" bill, that none of them voted for.
The American people won't be fooled.
One man's pork is another man's treasure.I'm good with people taking people to task for not voting for a bill, while trying to take credit for it.
I'm confused why "pork-filled" bill is in quotations however, especially followed by "American people won't be fooled"
Why didn't the media report on the pork-filled bills? Were they for Trump? Show me some of these bills that were pork-filled that Trump signed.One man's pork is another man's treasure.I'm good with people taking people to task for not voting for a bill, while trying to take credit for it.
I'm confused why "pork-filled" bill is in quotations however, especially followed by "American people won't be fooled"
None of these posters spoke about pork during Trump's' very short 4-year spending spree.
Yet, he signed many pork-filled bills. Literally all of them were.
Since there's no consistency, Republicans are bad-faith actors on this issue and have no standing in this argument.
As usual.
They did the same thing with the American Recovery Act when Obama took office. Nobody should be shocked or surprised by this.A republican from Florida is trying to take credit for the covid relief bill.
She actually called it a "bipartisan" bill.
Yet not even one republican voted for it.
How many more republicans will start lying about it and try to take credit for the bill?
marc are you saying there is no "pork" in this bill?.....hey just asking....See?
They already are attempting to take credit for this "pork-filled" bill, that none of them voted for.
The American people won't be fooled.
Why didn't the media report on the pork-filled bills? Were they for Trump? Show me some of these bills that were pork-filled that Trump signed.One man's pork is another man's treasure.I'm good with people taking people to task for not voting for a bill, while trying to take credit for it.
I'm confused why "pork-filled" bill is in quotations however, especially followed by "American people won't be fooled"
None of these posters spoke about pork during Trump's' very short 4-year spending spree.
Yet, he signed many pork-filled bills. Literally all of them were.
Since there's no consistency, Republicans are bad-faith actors on this issue and have no standing in this argument.
As usual.
Those "pork-filled bills"you mentioned were reported; perhaps you missed some of the previous four years. The list of "pork-filled bills" which the Orange Clown signed is far too long to enumerate. To abbreviate the list, computing the Clown's total debt generated to date from the beginning of his first fiscal year's budget starting 10/1/2017, to this point in his last budget FY to date, 3/10/2021 can display the blatant hypocrisy of the GOP and their own spending habits of the public purse!Why didn't the media report on the pork-filled bills? Were they for Trump? Show me some of these bills that were pork-filled that Trump signed.
Nothing you just said had anything to do with Pork-filled bills.Why didn't the media report on the pork-filled bills? Were they for Trump? Show me some of these bills that were pork-filled that Trump signed.One man's pork is another man's treasure.I'm good with people taking people to task for not voting for a bill, while trying to take credit for it.
I'm confused why "pork-filled" bill is in quotations however, especially followed by "American people won't be fooled"
None of these posters spoke about pork during Trump's' very short 4-year spending spree.
Yet, he signed many pork-filled bills. Literally all of them were.
Since there's no consistency, Republicans are bad-faith actors on this issue and have no standing in this argument.
As usual.Those "pork-filled bills"you mentioned were reported; perhaps you missed some of the previous four years. The list of "pork-filled bills" which the Orange Clown signed is far too long to enumerate. To abbreviate the list, computing the Clown's total debt generated to date from the beginning of his first fiscal year's budget starting 10/1/2017, to this point in his last budget FY to date, 3/10/2021 can display the blatant hypocrisy of the GOP and their own spending habits of the public purse!Why didn't the media report on the pork-filled bills? Were they for Trump? Show me some of these bills that were pork-filled that Trump signed.
In the beginning, 10/1/17, Obama's final debt stood at $20,347,802,336,478 on day one of tRump's first budget. As of 3/10/2021, six months before the end of the Clown's 4th and final budget ends and the 2022 Biden 1st debt begins, the debt NOW stands at $27,900,419,069,251. So that means that in 3.5 years of the Clown-in-Chief's reign, his budgets produced to date in the vicinity of $7.552617 Trillion in just 3.5 years. That means the Orange Clown has set a record for any President's first term budgets setting a record deficit; another GOP verbal hat trick with the budget's ACTUAL FIGURES!
Now you were saying something about "pork-filled bills"? Perhaps you should pay more attention to MarkATL. He was absolutely correct about tRumpy's profligate spending.
US Treasury Debt so you can verify the numbers;
~~ Government - The Debt to the Penny and Who Holds It ~~
Nothing you just said had anything to do with Pork-filled bills.Why didn't the media report on the pork-filled bills? Were they for Trump? Show me some of these bills that were pork-filled that Trump signed.One man's pork is another man's treasure.I'm good with people taking people to task for not voting for a bill, while trying to take credit for it.
I'm confused why "pork-filled" bill is in quotations however, especially followed by "American people won't be fooled"
None of these posters spoke about pork during Trump's' very short 4-year spending spree.
Yet, he signed many pork-filled bills. Literally all of them were.
Since there's no consistency, Republicans are bad-faith actors on this issue and have no standing in this argument.
As usual.Those "pork-filled bills"you mentioned were reported; perhaps you missed some of the previous four years. The list of "pork-filled bills" which the Orange Clown signed is far too long to enumerate. To abbreviate the list, computing the Clown's total debt generated to date from the beginning of his first fiscal year's budget starting 10/1/2017, to this point in his last budget FY to date, 3/10/2021 can display the blatant hypocrisy of the GOP and their own spending habits of the public purse!Why didn't the media report on the pork-filled bills? Were they for Trump? Show me some of these bills that were pork-filled that Trump signed.
In the beginning, 10/1/17, Obama's final debt stood at $20,347,802,336,478 on day one of tRump's first budget. As of 3/10/2021, six months before the end of the Clown's 4th and final budget ends and the 2022 Biden 1st debt begins, the debt NOW stands at $27,900,419,069,251. So that means that in 3.5 years of the Clown-in-Chief's reign, his budgets produced to date in the vicinity of $7.552617 Trillion in just 3.5 years. That means the Orange Clown has set a record for any President's first term budgets setting a record deficit; another GOP verbal hat trick with the budget's ACTUAL FIGURES!
Now you were saying something about "pork-filled bills"? Perhaps you should pay more attention to MarkATL. He was absolutely correct about tRumpy's profligate spending.
US Treasury Debt so you can verify the numbers;
~~ Government - The Debt to the Penny and Who Holds It ~~
I'm sure you are used to being able to bully people by being well written and forceful. That doesn't work on me. The only thing you just did there was say that Trump spent more money and the debt went up.
Would you like to link those "Pork-filled" bills now? I'm sure there are some... There almost has to be. Shouldn't be hard to find one.
Perhaps you need help to define what a "Pork-filled bill" is? Because the national debt going up doesn't really mean anything to the term. It can be a side effect of it. But it means nothing to the term.
Are you truly that stupid or are you just playing at stupid? "Pork" has everything to do with excessive spending by Congress in the massive piles of legislation, be it by one tribe the other, or both! And all those funds added at the behest of campaign donors or their tax cuts or special tax deductions, et al, all suck taxpayer dollars out of the Treasury or keep them from coming in! That is the source of producing the "Pork", slick! I didn't believe it necessary to delve into Congressional sausage-making, given I expected to be dealing with adults on this forum!Nothing you just said had anything to do with Pork-filled bills.
Well, you got a portion of what I wrote right but not the reasoning, which should be obvious! BUT look up "cause and effect" and by application of reason, you might be able to figure out how bloated bills from Congress can deplete the funds of the Treasury causing their own real problems compounding the mess!!The only thing you just did there was say that Trump spent more money and the debt went up.
Republicans would have supported a bill aimed entirely at Covid relief, but as usual the bill is filled with things that have nothing to do with what the bill was supposed to address.
Covid relief is 9% of the bill. The rest is a Dimocrat's wet dream.
This bill will forever prevent America for coming even close to seriously address our debt. Your children's children's children will be paying for it long after you are even a memory.
I applaud any lawmaker that voted NO on this piece of shit legislation.
Perhaps you need help to define what a "Pork-filled bill" is?Nothing you just said had anything to do with Pork-filled bills.Why didn't the media report on the pork-filled bills? Were they for Trump? Show me some of these bills that were pork-filled that Trump signed.One man's pork is another man's treasure.I'm good with people taking people to task for not voting for a bill, while trying to take credit for it.
I'm confused why "pork-filled" bill is in quotations however, especially followed by "American people won't be fooled"
None of these posters spoke about pork during Trump's' very short 4-year spending spree.
Yet, he signed many pork-filled bills. Literally all of them were.
Since there's no consistency, Republicans are bad-faith actors on this issue and have no standing in this argument.
As usual.Those "pork-filled bills"you mentioned were reported; perhaps you missed some of the previous four years. The list of "pork-filled bills" which the Orange Clown signed is far too long to enumerate. To abbreviate the list, computing the Clown's total debt generated to date from the beginning of his first fiscal year's budget starting 10/1/2017, to this point in his last budget FY to date, 3/10/2021 can display the blatant hypocrisy of the GOP and their own spending habits of the public purse!Why didn't the media report on the pork-filled bills? Were they for Trump? Show me some of these bills that were pork-filled that Trump signed.
In the beginning, 10/1/17, Obama's final debt stood at $20,347,802,336,478 on day one of tRump's first budget. As of 3/10/2021, six months before the end of the Clown's 4th and final budget ends and the 2022 Biden 1st debt begins, the debt NOW stands at $27,900,419,069,251. So that means that in 3.5 years of the Clown-in-Chief's reign, his budgets produced to date in the vicinity of $7.552617 Trillion in just 3.5 years. That means the Orange Clown has set a record for any President's first term budgets setting a record deficit; another GOP verbal hat trick with the budget's ACTUAL FIGURES!
Now you were saying something about "pork-filled bills"? Perhaps you should pay more attention to MarkATL. He was absolutely correct about tRumpy's profligate spending.
US Treasury Debt so you can verify the numbers;
~~ Government - The Debt to the Penny and Who Holds It ~~
I'm sure you are used to being able to bully people by being well written and forceful. That doesn't work on me. The only thing you just did there was say that Trump spent more money and the debt went up.
Would you like to link those "Pork-filled" bills now? I'm sure there are some... There almost has to be. Shouldn't be hard to find one.
Perhaps you need help to define what a "Pork-filled bill" is? Because the national debt going up doesn't really mean anything to the term. It can be a side effect of it. But it means nothing to the term.Are you truly that stupid or are you just playing at stupid? "Pork" has everything to do with excessive spending by Congress in the massive piles of legislation, be it by one tribe the other, or both! And all those funds added at the behest of campaign donors or their tax cuts or special tax deductions, et al, all suck taxpayer dollars out of the Treasury or keep them from coming in! That is the source of producing the "Pork", slick! I didn't believe it necessary to delve into Congressional sausage-making, given I expected to be dealing with adults on this forum!Nothing you just said had anything to do with Pork-filled bills.
Well, you got a portion of what I wrote right but not the reasoning, which should be obvious! BUT look up "cause and effect" and by application of reason, you might be able to figure out how bloated bills from Congress can deplete the funds of the Treasury causing their own real problems compounding the mess!!The only thing you just did there was say that Trump spent more money and the debt went up.