Incrementally there is no change in waste heat from replacing fossil fuels with solar.You have magic electricity that doesn't produce heat when used?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Incrementally there is no change in waste heat from replacing fossil fuels with solar.You have magic electricity that doesn't produce heat when used?
Your ego won’t allow you to see it any other way.
No, we did not determine that. You refuse to acknowledge that there is no change in waste heat from switching from fossil fuels to solar.We've already determined that moving heat from one spot to another doesn't actually cool the planet.
there was less infrared radiation at 6 solar farms because photons were converted into electricity that would have otherwise produced heat.
Says the guy who can’t comprehend that there is no change in waste heat Friday m switching from fossil fuels to solar.Or reality.
Incrementally there is no change in waste heat from replacing fossil fuels with solar.
Exact same waste heat regardless of the generating technology.And more heat at the toaster.
Pretty sure I’ve always said the best way to usher in the next glacial cycle and is the widespread use of solar.Well, there is, but that wasn't your original glacial cycle claim.
No, we did not determine that. You refuse to acknowledge that there is no change in waste heat from switching from fossil fuels to solar.
Exact same heat regardless of the generating technology.Heat!
Darn, FLoT wins again.
Solar power converts photons into electricity that would have otherwise produced heat.You still want to claim moving heat from a panel to a city cools the planet? Ok. Prove it.
It’s not a new claim.If you want to move to this new claim, because I refuted your old one, then show your math. Pick an amount of electricity and show the waste heat for nat gas, coal and solar.
Proxies are widely used in science and engineering. Doesn’t make them not empirical.YOUR satellites are measuring radiation ... and INFERRING temperature from that ... thermometers on the ground DO NOT verify these inferences ... do they? ...
I suspect the cement footings are still curing, and you know that's an exothermic reaction ... thus we have a two-fold reason to abandon our blackbody model ...
/——-/A recent study find the following climate tipping points nearing certainty.
View attachment 693962
![]()
World on brink of five ‘disastrous’ climate tipping points, study finds
Giant ice sheets, ocean currents and permafrost regions may already have passed point of irreversible changewww.theguardian.com
But, of course, none of these actually look threatening, do they. And since this is all based on lies, there is NOTHING to worry about. Right?
The confusion is all yours. Photons being converted into electricity rather than producing heat is conservation of energy.Incorrect.
The heat moved from the farm, in the form of electricity, doesn't reappear when the electricity is used? Why not? Explain the violation of the First Law. You'd be up for a Nobel Prize......like Michael Mann.
There is no change in waste heat from replacing fossil fuels with solar.
Let's clear up your FLoT confusion, first, before we move onto your adjusted claim.
Exact same waste heat regardless of the generating technology.
Exact same heat regardless of the generating technology.
Switching from fossil fuels to some lar will result in an incremental cooling effect due to photons being converted into electricity that would have otherwise produced heat.
Solar power converts photons into electricity that would have otherwise produced heat.