Global warming tipping points

We've already determined that moving heat from one spot to another doesn't actually cool the planet.
No, we did not determine that. You refuse to acknowledge that there is no change in waste heat from switching from fossil fuels to solar.
 
No, we did not determine that. You refuse to acknowledge that there is no change in waste heat from switching from fossil fuels to solar.

No, we did not determine that.


You still want to claim moving heat from a panel to a city cools the planet? Ok. Prove it.

You refuse to acknowledge that there is no change in waste heat from switching from fossil fuels to solar.

If you want to move to this new claim, because I refuted your old one, then show your math.

Pick an amount of electricity and show the waste heat for nat gas, coal and solar.
 
Heat!

Darn, FLoT wins again.
Exact same heat regardless of the generating technology.

Switching from fossil fuels to some lar will result in an incremental cooling effect due to photons being converted into electricity that would have otherwise produced heat.
 
YOUR satellites are measuring radiation ... and INFERRING temperature from that ... thermometers on the ground DO NOT verify these inferences ... do they? ...

I suspect the cement footings are still curing, and you know that's an exothermic reaction ... thus we have a two-fold reason to abandon our blackbody model ...
Proxies are widely used in science and engineering. Doesn’t make them not empirical.
 
A recent study find the following climate tipping points nearing certainty.
View attachment 693962

But, of course, none of these actually look threatening, do they. And since this is all based on lies, there is NOTHING to worry about. Right?
/——-/
3B052005-F469-4600-B57D-DE422B1EDA71.jpeg
 
Incorrect.

The heat moved from the farm, in the form of electricity, doesn't reappear when the electricity is used? Why not? Explain the violation of the First Law. You'd be up for a Nobel Prize......like Michael Mann.

There is no change in waste heat from replacing fossil fuels with solar.

Let's clear up your FLoT confusion, first, before we move onto your adjusted claim.
The confusion is all yours. Photons being converted into electricity rather than producing heat is conservation of energy.

Replacing fossil fuels with solar does not change electricity usage so there is no change in waste heat from switching from fossil fuels to solar.
 
Exact same waste heat regardless of the generating technology.

You're admitting there is waste heat at point of use for solar?

But you just said, "The photons that were converted into electricity did not produce warming because they were converted into electricity instead"
 
Exact same heat regardless of the generating technology.

Switching from fossil fuels to some lar will result in an incremental cooling effect due to photons being converted into electricity that would have otherwise produced heat.

It's hilarious that you think those "converted" photons don't still produce heat.
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top