ReinyDays
Gold Member
FUCK ... Chick has me posting things that caused ChemEngineer to take me off ignore ... that sucks ... what an asshole ...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Let me correct that right now, Mister Hateful Foul Mouth.FUCK ... Chick has me posting things that caused ChemEngineer to take me off ignore ... that sucks ... what an asshole ...
When did you post the date?I already told you? Do you believe the laws of radiative forcing changed or something?
When did you post the date?
What's your definition of catastrophe?"Why do you think another degree of warming will have catastrophic results?" ... do you just avoid disturbing questions or something? ...
Look at the ice core data. You know how to use google, right?When did you post the date?
He's extremely reluctant to actually identify what he's talking about because he knows he'll get shredded. As I pointed out earlier, you don't determine correlation between trends with a single set of instantaneous parameters.When did you post the date?
So you too are unaware that the previous interglacial cycle had 26ft higher sea levels with 120 ppm less atmospheric CO2?He's extremely reluctant to actually identify what he's talking about because he knows he'll get shredded. As I pointed out earlier, you don't determine correlation between trends with a single set of instantaneous parameters.
Why not? Did the radiative forcing of CO2 change?As I pointed out earlier, you don't determine correlation between trends with a single set of instantaneous parameters.
What's your definition of catastrophe?
That's a nice safe approach.Four deviations ... just to be safe ...
When was that again?So you too are unaware that the previous interglacial cycle had 26ft higher sea levels with 120 ppm less atmospheric CO2?
At peak interglaciation ... roughly the beginning of the Holocene 10,000 years ago ... that means any effect of global warming would exist in the historical record ... no hypercanes, no hockey sticks ... those who say these will happen are lying ... it's never happen before, it won't happen in the future ...When was that again?
No. The previous interglacial cycle. It’s called Eemian.At peak interglaciation ... roughly the beginning of the Holocene 10,000 years ago ... that means any effect of global warming would exist in the historical record ... no hypercanes, no hockey sticks ... those who say these will happen are lying ... it's never happen before, it won't happen in the future ...
and was followed by the most recent glacial period (Weichselian/Wisconsinan)No. The previous interglacial cycle. It’s called Eemian.
What happened?The significance, as you've been told before, is due to the speed with which the Earth warmed 1.1C
What was the catalyst for the climate event?At peak interglaciation ... roughly the beginning of the Holocene 10,000 years ago ... that means any effect of global warming would exist in the historical record ... no hypercanes, no hockey sticks ... those who say these will happen are lying ... it's never happen before, it won't happen in the future ...