German Scientists Predict Global Cooling This Century

longknife

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2012
Messages
42,221
Reaction score
13,044
Points
2,250
Location
Sin City
Oops!

German scientists contend that two natural cycles will combine to lower global temperatures throughout the 21st Century. The scientists show that there is an approximate 200-year solar cycle, supported by historical temperature data and proxy data from stalagmites in caves. The 200-year solar cycle has just passed its maximum and will decline during the 21st Century. It is at least in part responsible for the warming of the last decades of the 20thCentury. The AMO/PDO cycle is also beginning its cool phase and will reach a minimum in 2035. The scientists conclude that “the global temperature will drop until 2100 to a value corresponding to the “little ice age” of 1870.”—Jonathan DuHamel, Tuscon Citizen, 4 December 2013
Read full piece @ German Scientists Predict Global Cooling This Century

With temperatures well below freezing here in Vegas and a massive storm with freezing temperatures moving across Europe, this is certainly not hard to believe. :eusa_whistle::eusa_whistle:
 

Abraham3

Rookie
Joined
Aug 1, 2012
Messages
4,289
Reaction score
164
Points
0
This article has already been posted. These scientists claim that their cycles are responsible for almost all the warming seen in the last 150 years. By such statements we know they are filled with shit.
 

SAYIT

Diamond Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2012
Messages
45,987
Reaction score
11,261
Points
2,100
This article has already been posted. These scientists claim that their cycles are responsible for almost all the warming seen in the last 150 years. By such statements we know they are filled with shit.
OK, now I'm curious. How does scientific opinion which conflicts with yours qualify as "shit?"
 

SAYIT

Diamond Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2012
Messages
45,987
Reaction score
11,261
Points
2,100
Oops!

German scientists contend that two natural cycles will combine to lower global temperatures throughout the 21st Century. The scientists show that there is an approximate 200-year solar cycle, supported by historical temperature data and proxy data from stalagmites in caves. The 200-year solar cycle has just passed its maximum and will decline during the 21st Century. It is at least in part responsible for the warming of the last decades of the 20thCentury. The AMO/PDO cycle is also beginning its cool phase and will reach a minimum in 2035. The scientists conclude that “the global temperature will drop until 2100 to a value corresponding to the “little ice age” of 1870.”—Jonathan DuHamel, Tuscon Citizen, 4 December 2013
Read full piece @ German Scientists Predict Global Cooling This Century

With temperatures well below freezing here in Vegas and a massive storm with freezing temperatures moving across Europe, this is certainly not hard to believe. :eusa_whistle::eusa_whistle:
While short-term variations from normal weather do not support claims of climate cooling or warming, that report matches one by Russian scientists a few years ago.
The good news?
If the big chill comes we can just stoke up the CO2 machine and test the greenhouse effect!
 

boedicca

Uppity Water Nymph
Joined
Feb 12, 2007
Messages
55,333
Reaction score
17,216
Points
2,250
Location
The Land of Funk
The earth has regularly and naturally gone through ice ages. There is no reason to believe this pattern is no longer active.

Time to buy fur coats (used on ebay) before they get outrageously expensive!
 

Abraham3

Rookie
Joined
Aug 1, 2012
Messages
4,289
Reaction score
164
Points
0
This article has already been posted. These scientists claim that their cycles are responsible for almost all the warming seen in the last 150 years. By such statements we know they are filled with shit.
OK, now I'm curious. How does scientific opinion which conflicts with yours qualify as "shit?"
When it also conflicts with the opinions of 97% of the world's climate scientists.
 

Abraham3

Rookie
Joined
Aug 1, 2012
Messages
4,289
Reaction score
164
Points
0
The earth has regularly and naturally gone through ice ages. There is no reason to believe this pattern is no longer active.

Time to buy fur coats (used on ebay) before they get outrageously expensive!
The reason to believe this is not part of such a pattern is that it doesn't fit the pattern in the slightest.
 

Dont Taz Me Bro

Diamond Member
Staff member
Moderator
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2009
Messages
50,413
Reaction score
14,744
Points
2,220
Location
Las Vegas, Nevada
This article has already been posted. These scientists claim that their cycles are responsible for almost all the warming seen in the last 150 years. By such statements we know they are filled with shit.
Because you say so? :lol::lol::lol::lol:

 

Abraham3

Rookie
Joined
Aug 1, 2012
Messages
4,289
Reaction score
164
Points
0
Again, because their statement is in conflict with the studied opinions of 97% of the world's climate scientists.
 

flacaltenn

Diamond Member
Staff member
Senior USMB Moderator
Moderator
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2011
Messages
59,287
Reaction score
13,862
Points
2,180
Location
Hillbilly Hollywood, Tenn
Again, because their statement is in conflict with the studied opinions of 97% of the world's climate scientists.
Bullshit.. The question being "is the earth currently warming" is a 97% consensus which includes the MAJORITY of the skeptics and deniers.. Any "poll" of WHY it is warming or how much it will warm is a far lower number.

40% of climate scientists don't even feel their specialty is a mature science..

And for the record --- I (and most rational people with a modest science bkgrnd) dont give a dam about old polls and consensus anyway..

These warnings about Solar variability ought to be seriously considered. There's as much public policy consequence (or more) if they are correct than with your gasping AGWarming prescriptions..
 

ScienceRocks

Democrat all the way!
Joined
Mar 16, 2010
Messages
59,455
Reaction score
6,753
Points
1,900
Location
The Good insane United states of America
Either way we're going to need energy IF we want to keep warm.

Nuclear--->The left is going to have to accept it.
Wind, solar and wave-->The right is going to have to accept.

Stop opposing long term energy. Just stupid.
 

HenryBHough

Gold Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2011
Messages
29,243
Reaction score
5,568
Points
290
Location
Oak Grove, Massachusetts
As with cats, one can generate usable amounts of electricity by rubbing two long haired liberals together. But be sure they're of the same sex lest you be overrun.
 

Katzndogz

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2011
Messages
65,656
Reaction score
7,473
Points
1,830
There is supposed to be 30 years of frigid weather caused by global warming. The 60% increase in the arctic ice cap this year was caused by global warming.

Because of global warming Britian will have longer, colder winters separated by summer which proves global warming.

Interestingly, the government believes we can print enough money to buy our way out of global warming so it won't be so cold.
 

ScienceRocks

Democrat all the way!
Joined
Mar 16, 2010
Messages
59,455
Reaction score
6,753
Points
1,900
Location
The Good insane United states of America
I've never been a big global warmer but once the fields throughout Russia, shale of north America, middle east and China runs out = over.

I'd transition away from fussil fuels or possibly get caught seeing our population die from the cold. :(
 

RetiredGySgt

Diamond Member
Joined
May 6, 2007
Messages
47,615
Reaction score
9,613
Points
2,040
Location
North Carolina
This article has already been posted. These scientists claim that their cycles are responsible for almost all the warming seen in the last 150 years. By such statements we know they are filled with shit.
OK, now I'm curious. How does scientific opinion which conflicts with yours qualify as "shit?"
When it also conflicts with the opinions of 97% of the world's climate scientists.
True science is not based on the Mobs mentality. If they have evidence to support the claim of the cycle, and they seem to, then they are presenting a SCIENTIFIC Theory that can be researched and either proven or disproven by records in history.

Just because a majority of so called scientists refuse to do the proving or disproving and instead react like you just did does not negate the scientific foundation of the claim.

You prove with this and other statements that you do not understand scientific theory or method at all. A theory is never proven or disproven simply by a majority plugging their ears and shouting NAHNAH NAH NAH..
 

skookerasbil

Platinum Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2009
Messages
35,488
Reaction score
4,127
Points
1,140
Location
Not the middle of nowhere
Either way we're going to need energy IF we want to keep warm.

Nuclear--->The left is going to have to accept it.
Wind, solar and wave-->The right is going to have to accept.

Stop opposing long term energy. Just stupid.


Clearly, your advocacy efforts are going to change the projections of every governmental and private energy forecast!!!!








or not........
 

ScienceRocks

Democrat all the way!
Joined
Mar 16, 2010
Messages
59,455
Reaction score
6,753
Points
1,900
Location
The Good insane United states of America
Either way we're going to need energy IF we want to keep warm.

Nuclear--->The left is going to have to accept it.
Wind, solar and wave-->The right is going to have to accept.

Stop opposing long term energy. Just stupid.


Clearly, your advocacy efforts are going to change the projections of every governmental and private energy forecast!!!!








or not........
Then tell me why your side of the rich oil corporations are attacking so violently???
 

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top