German Scientists Predict Global Cooling This Century

longknife

Diamond Member
Sep 21, 2012
42,221
13,088
2,250
Sin City
Oops!

German scientists contend that two natural cycles will combine to lower global temperatures throughout the 21st Century. The scientists show that there is an approximate 200-year solar cycle, supported by historical temperature data and proxy data from stalagmites in caves. The 200-year solar cycle has just passed its maximum and will decline during the 21st Century. It is at least in part responsible for the warming of the last decades of the 20thCentury. The AMO/PDO cycle is also beginning its cool phase and will reach a minimum in 2035. The scientists conclude that “the global temperature will drop until 2100 to a value corresponding to the “little ice age” of 1870.”—Jonathan DuHamel, Tuscon Citizen, 4 December 2013

Read full piece @ German Scientists Predict Global Cooling This Century

With temperatures well below freezing here in Vegas and a massive storm with freezing temperatures moving across Europe, this is certainly not hard to believe. :eusa_whistle::eusa_whistle:
 
This article has already been posted. These scientists claim that their cycles are responsible for almost all the warming seen in the last 150 years. By such statements we know they are filled with shit.
 
This article has already been posted. These scientists claim that their cycles are responsible for almost all the warming seen in the last 150 years. By such statements we know they are filled with shit.

OK, now I'm curious. How does scientific opinion which conflicts with yours qualify as "shit?"
 
Oops!

German scientists contend that two natural cycles will combine to lower global temperatures throughout the 21st Century. The scientists show that there is an approximate 200-year solar cycle, supported by historical temperature data and proxy data from stalagmites in caves. The 200-year solar cycle has just passed its maximum and will decline during the 21st Century. It is at least in part responsible for the warming of the last decades of the 20thCentury. The AMO/PDO cycle is also beginning its cool phase and will reach a minimum in 2035. The scientists conclude that “the global temperature will drop until 2100 to a value corresponding to the “little ice age” of 1870.”—Jonathan DuHamel, Tuscon Citizen, 4 December 2013

Read full piece @ German Scientists Predict Global Cooling This Century

With temperatures well below freezing here in Vegas and a massive storm with freezing temperatures moving across Europe, this is certainly not hard to believe. :eusa_whistle::eusa_whistle:

While short-term variations from normal weather do not support claims of climate cooling or warming, that report matches one by Russian scientists a few years ago.
The good news?
If the big chill comes we can just stoke up the CO2 machine and test the greenhouse effect!
 
The earth has regularly and naturally gone through ice ages. There is no reason to believe this pattern is no longer active.

Time to buy fur coats (used on ebay) before they get outrageously expensive!
 
This article has already been posted. These scientists claim that their cycles are responsible for almost all the warming seen in the last 150 years. By such statements we know they are filled with shit.

OK, now I'm curious. How does scientific opinion which conflicts with yours qualify as "shit?"

When it also conflicts with the opinions of 97% of the world's climate scientists.
 
The earth has regularly and naturally gone through ice ages. There is no reason to believe this pattern is no longer active.

Time to buy fur coats (used on ebay) before they get outrageously expensive!

The reason to believe this is not part of such a pattern is that it doesn't fit the pattern in the slightest.
 
This article has already been posted. These scientists claim that their cycles are responsible for almost all the warming seen in the last 150 years. By such statements we know they are filled with shit.

Because you say so? :lol::lol::lol::lol:

Spanish_inquisition.jpg
 
Again, because their statement is in conflict with the studied opinions of 97% of the world's climate scientists.
 
Again, because their statement is in conflict with the studied opinions of 97% of the world's climate scientists.

Bullshit.. The question being "is the earth currently warming" is a 97% consensus which includes the MAJORITY of the skeptics and deniers.. Any "poll" of WHY it is warming or how much it will warm is a far lower number.

40% of climate scientists don't even feel their specialty is a mature science..

And for the record --- I (and most rational people with a modest science bkgrnd) dont give a dam about old polls and consensus anyway..

These warnings about Solar variability ought to be seriously considered. There's as much public policy consequence (or more) if they are correct than with your gasping AGWarming prescriptions..
 
There is supposed to be 30 years of frigid weather caused by global warming. The 60% increase in the arctic ice cap this year was caused by global warming.

Because of global warming Britian will have longer, colder winters separated by summer which proves global warming.

Interestingly, the government believes we can print enough money to buy our way out of global warming so it won't be so cold.
 
I've never been a big global warmer but once the fields throughout Russia, shale of north America, middle east and China runs out = over.

I'd transition away from fussil fuels or possibly get caught seeing our population die from the cold. :(
 
This article has already been posted. These scientists claim that their cycles are responsible for almost all the warming seen in the last 150 years. By such statements we know they are filled with shit.

OK, now I'm curious. How does scientific opinion which conflicts with yours qualify as "shit?"

When it also conflicts with the opinions of 97% of the world's climate scientists.

True science is not based on the Mobs mentality. If they have evidence to support the claim of the cycle, and they seem to, then they are presenting a SCIENTIFIC Theory that can be researched and either proven or disproven by records in history.

Just because a majority of so called scientists refuse to do the proving or disproving and instead react like you just did does not negate the scientific foundation of the claim.

You prove with this and other statements that you do not understand scientific theory or method at all. A theory is never proven or disproven simply by a majority plugging their ears and shouting NAHNAH NAH NAH..
 
Either way we're going to need energy IF we want to keep warm.

Nuclear--->The left is going to have to accept it.
Wind, solar and wave-->The right is going to have to accept.

Stop opposing long term energy. Just stupid.



Clearly, your advocacy efforts are going to change the projections of every governmental and private energy forecast!!!!








or not........
 
Either way we're going to need energy IF we want to keep warm.

Nuclear--->The left is going to have to accept it.
Wind, solar and wave-->The right is going to have to accept.

Stop opposing long term energy. Just stupid.



Clearly, your advocacy efforts are going to change the projections of every governmental and private energy forecast!!!!








or not........

Then tell me why your side of the rich oil corporations are attacking so violently???
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top