Generating electricity for cities in cities

what now?......what IS it now?......dang.......so even though you've.........these........standards of English........you won't.........put shoes on..........that are..........not quite your.......aww heck nevermind I bet you can't waste time when you are superhero to those ten kids of yours, raisin em and seeing they get through college which you never had the opportunity to do, but maybe one them....

No citation? ... so much for your arguments ...
 
And that's why your claim that solar power cools the planet was so laughable.
Says the guy who thinks seas aren't rising because he has a photo of the statue of Liberty from 80 years ago.

Replacing fossil fuels with solar will cool the planet. It's just math.
 
Right. Cooler at the panel, warmer where the power is used.
Now the issue is the lower albedo means net warming.

Any photons absorbed by the panel aren't reflected by the surface.
Including waste heat from electrical generation which has more waste heat... electricity generated from fossil fuels or solar power?
 
I think ding is right that the sun's heat would convert to mechanical motion which would make it slightly cooler but ding what if the electricity is used to power light bulbs or heating elements? then it just turns right back into heat heating the atmosphere?
Waste heat from electricity usage is the same regardless of how it was generated. Not so for the waste heat from the generation of electricity. Waste heat from generating electricity from fossil fuels is about equal to the waste heat from using the electricity. So fossil fuels produce about two ties the waste heat that solar does.

So replacing fossil fuels with solar will have a net cooling effect.
 
Says the guy who thinks seas aren't rising because he has a photo of the statue of Liberty from 80 years ago.

Replacing fossil fuels with solar will cool the planet. It's just math.

I don't give a shit about the seas rising.

EMH's photo idiocy is hilarious.

Lower albedo solar panels will heat the planet.
 
Don't care.

Your physics idiocy is hilarious!
It's not physics, dummy. The waste heat from generating and using electricity from fossil fuels is two times the waste heat from generating and using electricity from solar. It's just math.

Tell me how the planet isn't warming. Tell me how the driver behind replacing fossil fuels with solar power isn't to cool the planet.
 
It's not physics, dummy. The waste heat from generating and using electricity from fossil fuels is two times the waste heat from generating and using electricity from solar. It's just math.

Tell me how the planet isn't warming. Tell me how the driver behind replacing fossil fuels with solar power isn't to cool the planet.

It's not physics,


1759616312021.webp



DURR
 
15th post
Solar panels in every building in a city would be horrendous to maintain and monitor.
 
Satellite measurements from 116 solar farms prove that photons converted into electricity are the cause of the localized cooling effect at the solar farms.

The Law of Conservation of Energy is a fundamental principle of physics stating that energy cannot be created or destroyed, only converted from one form to another.
 
And localized warming at point of use.
Why do you keep ignoring the massive amount of waste heat from generating electricity from fossil fuels? If you are going to do an energy balance you have to account for it all, dumb dumb.
 
The Law of Conservation of Energy is a fundamental principle of physics stating that energy cannot be created or destroyed, only converted from one form to another.
Yes. So what? What does that have to do with the energy balance of switching from fossil fuels to solar power? Both generate waste heat from electricity usage. Fossil fuels generate significantly more waste heat generating that electricity than solar does. Fossil fuels don't create localized cooling like solar does.
 
Back
Top Bottom