G.W. Bush EFFED Up Things So Much With Iraq That Even Republicans Are War Weary

[Stephanie]

Today I saw something I never thought I'd see this side of the ground...Chicken Hawk Neo-Con Billy Kristol balking at the thought of another war.

And he was doing it on,...wait for it...msnbc to boot.

I mean...WoW!!!!

so? that is more important than your Dear Leader wanting to take this COUNTRY TO WAR?

You Obamabots must get tired of wiping his ass for him...Obama is a War Mogher and you who voted for him GOT SUCKERD as he was suppose to be PEACE and not WAR...
so point out a lot a of PETTY crap on others to DEFLECT...You all have gotten good at that

 

[Wildman]

I think you mean the left raised such a stink about the war that we couldn't get anything accomplished.

But now that their guy wants to blow up a country that didn't attack us, **** that shit...they can't wait to get behind killing some brown people.

Hypocrites all.

they may be hypocrites but i agree with Sarah Palin: “Let Allah Sort It Out, So we’re bombing Syria because Syria is bombing Syria? And I’m the idiot?”

i say stay out of it, let those muslimes kill each other off, it is a win,win for the whole world !

we were killing AQ's in Iraq and still Afghanistan.., and now the mulatto muslime wants to help them in Syria ??

is there something here i am or anyone else missing ?? if so someone please explain....., IF you can......, aaaaaah i forgot, only a liarberal can explain this madness

 

[Bluedog]

Perhaps the positive to come out of President Bush and the Iraq campaign is this:

The cost of actions such as this are not worth our country getting involved. want a reason to avoid Syria, see Iraq. Thats the great thing about history, we can learn from it if we choose to. What worries me is how one interprets the data.

imho

 

[NYcarbineer]

People really need to spend less time worrying about who's consistent or inconsistent

and more time worrying about what is the right thing to do.

 

[Katzndogz]

The right thing to do is degrade Assad's ability command and control and leave the chemical weapons unsecured.

Only a democrat would think so.

 

[Stephanie]

People really need to spend less time worrying about who's consistent or inconsistent

and more time worrying about what is the right thing to do.

umhummm, like you all did with Bush and Iraq?

 

[Stephanie]

I think you mean the left raised such a stink about the war that we couldn't get anything accomplished.

But now that their guy wants to blow up a country that didn't attack us, **** that shit...they can't wait to get behind killing some brown people.

Hypocrites all.

they may be hypocrites but i agree with Sarah Palin: “Let Allah Sort It Out, So we’re bombing Syria because Syria is bombing Syria? And I’m the idiot?”

i say stay out of it, let those muslimes kill each other off, it is a win,win for the whole world !

we were killing AQ's in Iraq and still Afghanistan.., and now the mulatto muslime wants to help them in Syria ??

is there something here i am or anyone else missing ?? if so someone please explain....., IF you can......, aaaaaah i forgot, only a liarberal can explain this madness

it's not hypocritical to support CERTAIN war...Bush or Palin never called for war with Syria...but the only hypocrite is Obama and his base..
they were against ALL WAR when Bush was in office
and now they have become bomb bomb bomb, war war war, kill kill kill...we will take anything OUR DEAR LEADER OBAMA want's

 

[rdean]

- Republicans are historically war weary

- Everyone should be war weary

- Right or wrong, Iraq is a better country today (much better than Syria)

- Though misguided, Bush II got the support of Congress and many, many other willing partners around the world unlike the flip floping Obama/Kerry/Clinton/Pelosi/etc

- The entire Middle East is a craphole no matter who is or has been in charge in America and it's not our fault

- President Obama is flailing because he is and always has been clueless about the world

- I got stung by a bee today. How the Hell did a bee get into my house...

WHAT

THE

****????

How can these people be so damn dumb????

The Reagan policies caused concern about the US overseas, but it was nothing compared to the disaster that was Bush.
To me, the most hilarious is the billion dollars Iraq has demanded to "fix" Baghdad.

The city released a statement saying “The U.S. forces changed this beautiful city to a camp in an ugly and destructive way, which reflected deliberate ignorance and carelessness about the simplest forms of public taste . . . Due to the huge damage, leading to a loss the Baghdad municipality cannot afford . . . we demand the American side apologize to Baghdad’s people and pay back these expenses.”

Baghdad demands $1 billion from US and apology

That's just one city. And these dumb ass right wingers think Iraq was a success when they threw shoes at our president and the guy that did it became a national hero.

Only the American right wing is so fucked up they look at a massive failure and terrible insults and see "success". That's how deluded they are. I honestly don't know how these people can be so stupid. It astounds me.

That's what happens when you are gripped in the throngs of rabid far RW reactionary politics...you just can't help yourself.

Look at the anger that bastart Bush caused to these people...

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WdvRWReY-Yo]Shoes thrown at Bush on Iraq trip - YouTube[/ame]

If you click on the YT link, you'll see Leon Godfrey's statement from 3 years ago...HILARIOUS!!


lol

*SMH @ Bush, his kronies and defenders*

Bush says, "It's like going to a political rally and having people yell at you????" What the ****???? Is he really that stupid? That was a physical attack with the worst insult you can possibly receive in a Muslim Country. And he says the guy was only looking for attention?

So Baghdad looking for a billion dollars and an apology is also looking for attention?

And America turned over our foreign policy to these Republican nitwits? It's hurts.

 

[blackhawk]

Bush has nothing to do with current clusterfuck in Syria that situation has been the work of the current president.

Sure he does.

The Invasion of Iraq changed the stability of the region. It sent refugees to all the countries in the region, emboldened terrorists, shifted the balance of power and created even more resentment to the west.

I don't know how you can seriously post something like this..

Really your going to try and sell that? The current situations in both Egyt and Syria are the result of the much hyped Arab spring that both President Obama and his supporters hailed as the great alternative to the Bush policies now that the Arab spring has gone to hell you want to go back to blame Bush that is not only pathetic it's a no sale.

 

[TooTall]

I think you mean the left raised such a stink about the war that we couldn't get anything accomplished.

But now that their guy wants to blow up a country that didn't attack us, **** that shit...they can't wait to get behind killing some brown people.

Hypocrites all.

Are the circumstances the same?

If so, please list it out for all to see.

Thanks.

Bush got a U.N. Resolution.

Bush had documented violations of the First Gulf War cease fire agreement.

Bush got approval from Congress.

Bush formed a coalition.

And still the left cried "Illegal War".

Now Obama has the reigns...the guy who bitched the loudest, and...

Does he have anything from the U.N.? NO.

Has Syria breached the cease fire terms of a previous armed conflict with the U.S.? NO.

Does he have Congressional Approval? He didn't want to get it..he was and is vehement that he doesn't need it, and he was going to make the decision personally. Only a monumental wave of opposition and negative public opinion stopped him. Being the Campaigner-in-Chief, that stopped him it his tracks.

Does he have a coalition? Not even our closest ally would join Obama's coalition...in fact our only ally of consequence so far is the socialist government of France.

Is it legal for the U.S. to attack Syria? From what I've read, not in the least.

U.N.'s Ban casts doubt on legality of U.S. plans to punish Syria | Reuters

Obama looks to Congress to bolster legal case for Syria strike - CNN.com

If It's Not Legal, Can A Strike On Syria Be Justified? : NPR
​

So, like I said, the left who cried "Illegal War" for the last 10 years are the same folks who are knee deep in supporting what looks to be a truly illegal attack today, when their guy is the one calling for it.

Couldn't possibly be more hypocritical.

May I add, Obama decided that he could make some political points by sending his decision to attack Syria to the Congress. In the mean time, Syria is moving all of the chemical delivery systems to schools, mosques, hospitals and the civilian suburbs where he knows Obama won't send his cruise missiles.

The new Obama strategy is to target all of Syria's air bases. This will help the rebel cause, but it is my understanding, subject to correction, that the gas attacks were delivered by ground base mortar devices that are now all safely hidden and cruise missiles can't hit them and won't prevent a single future attack with poison gas.

 

[MarcATL]

Obama has turned out to be a BIGGER war monger than Bush..

and now his cult members have to spin that...so now it's because of Bush Americans are against Obama going to war with Syria..

what a frikken joker you Obamabots are

but notice how all them ANTI-WAR people are now not SAYING A WORD...no protesting, no code pinkeos, etc etc

just MAKING EXCUSES for it

Why are you such a RANCID little partisan liar?

I watched Code Pink members being escorted out of the hearing yesterday on live TV while Kerry spoke.

See?

You are THEE worse poster on this board...bar none.

 

[MarcATL]

The democrats have to pull out all the stops to blame Bush. If they can't, it means a total republican blow out in 2014 and 2016. Maybe beyond that.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!


Too funny.

 

[MarcATL]

Perhaps the positive to come out of President Bush and the Iraq campaign is this:

The cost of actions such as this are not worth our country getting involved. want a reason to avoid Syria, see Iraq. Thats the great thing about history, we can learn from it if we choose to. What worries me is how one interprets the data.

imho

You're absolutely right.

G.W. Bush is the perfect model of exactly what NOT to do.

Seems a good bit of the American People have learned from that COLOSSAL FAILURE in that sense.

 

[MarcATL]

People really need to spend less time worrying about who's consistent or inconsistent

and more time worrying about what is the right thing to do.

umhummm, like you all did with Bush and Iraq?

umhummm, history has already PROVEN beyond the shadow of a doubt that what that Bush did was ABSOLUTELY the wrong thing to do.

Your idiocy knows no bounds.

 

[Samson]

Because of Bush II and his MASSIVE and CONSTANT lies to push the country into an unecessary war with the wrong country that not only cost countless of lives but left us near total financial collapse he's left the country with pretty much ZERO credibility.

No one wants to hear anything about war anymore, they're just sick of it. Can't believe anything anyone in the government says about it.

Thanks to G.W. Bush.

Good job!



*SMH*

Do you have a man crush on Bush or something?

MarcATL - 1 Intelligence - 0

I'm not the one defending that COLOSSAL failure of a President.

Interesting.

The motive for making Bush look bad is because there's not much to make Obama look better?

Obama shouldn't need this "help,".......unless, the economy has only marginally improved during the past 5 years, and we continue to embroil ourselves in overseas military adventers for which there are no national benefits....

 

[deltex1]

Because of Bush II and his MASSIVE and CONSTANT lies to push the country into an unecessary war with the wrong country that not only cost countless of lives but left us near total financial collapse he's left the country with pretty much ZERO credibility.

No one wants to hear anything about war anymore, they're just sick of it. Can't believe anything anyone in the government says about it.

Thanks to G.W. Bush.

Good job!



*SMH*

You are full of shit. Iraq had WMD...we moved them after we invaded...one of the best kept secrets of aaalll tiiiiimmmmes!

 

[ClosedCaption]

loo, IT IS BUSHES FAULT! IT IS BUSHES FAULT! IT IS BUSHES FAULT! IT IS BUSHES FAULT! IT IS BUSHES FAULT! IT IS BUSHES FAULT! IT IS BUSHES FAULT! IT IS BUSHES FAULT! IT IS BUSHES FAULT! IT IS BUSHES FAULT! IT IS BUSHES FAULT! IT IS BUSHES FAULT! IT IS BUSHES FAULT! IT IS BUSHES FAULT! IT IS BUSHES FAULT! IT IS BUSHES FAULT! IT IS BUSHES FAULT! IT IS BUSHES FAULT! - Democratic Party 'policy' on everything for the last four years.

Great point and well thought out too. No wonder you received so many thanks for this literary jewel

 

[IlarMeilyr]

Because of Bush II and his MASSIVE and CONSTANT lies to push the country into an unecessary war with the wrong country that not only cost countless of lives but left us near total financial collapse he's left the country with pretty much ZERO credibility.

No one wants to hear anything about war anymore, they're just sick of it. Can't believe anything anyone in the government says about it.

Thanks to G.W. Bush.

Good job!



*SMH*

President Bush did not sign an Executive Law called the Iraq War Resolution.

Congress did that.

W advocated for the war, and he had some valid points. The intel and information which we had was also arguably incorrect to some extent.

And?

That is NOT the same as W "lying."

Your rhetoric is all old, stale and it remains unsupported, Marc.

Your rhetoric is useless crap and provides no sound basis for the position you are attempting to stake out here.

Being sick of war isn't such a bad thing anyway.

There is a far more pressing issue, however.

Since Obumbler cannot manage to articulate ANY kind of "foreign policy," and appears to have no such notion anywhere in his pin head, it falls to us, the people, to discuss and debate the merits (or lack thereof) of the strike he urges us to make against Syria.

What is the American national interest in hitting some military targets in Syria? It can't be fear of an imminent threat posed by Syria. There is none. It cannot be that saving people from being gassed by Assad is somehow a matter of our national interest or security or otherwise we'd have done -- oh, I dunno -- SOMETHING in Darfur. It can't be retaliation for any Syrian strike against us. The President doesn't even CLAIM that as a basis.

Under these circumstances, why should the President be permitted to strike at Syria? Congress has not granted him any such permission. He has no unilateral authority of that type under the constitution or even under the War Powers Resolution absent one of those factors. And none of those factors are implicated.

 

[skookerasbil]

nobody cares about George Bush except the hyper-progressives on the internet.

 

[Kondor3]

When Shrub took office, the Afghan War was 7 years old (2001-2009)...

Shrub left office in early 2009, more than four years ago...

Today, the Afghan War is nearly 12 years old (2001-2013)...

Something tells me that Obumble had something to do with it, too... not just Shrub.