- Aug 16, 2011
- Reaction score
And so Germany would not have received the 'test' of the bomb.
What democratically elected government?Remember Lenin caused the Civil War when he ousted a democratically elected government.
And don't forget Stalin was allied with Hitler when they started WW II together.
You really can't see why the lackey Truman wouldn't have pulled that trigger?In fact, Germany was always the intended target for "the gadget". Belief that Germany was already developing a nuclear weapon was a major reason why Roosevelt approved The Manhattan Project.
When Germany was over-ran by Allied troops in late '44, early '45, it was learned that Germany had never made a serious effort to develop a nuclear weapon. A German program had been started as early as 1940 but was dismantled only a year later.
America was very close to developing the bomb when this was learned and the rationalization for its use was switched from Germany to Japan.
You really can't see why the lackey Truman wouldn't have pulled that trigger?
Sinajuavi you, are a Phony.When did you become an expert on black people? You apparently know nothing about them... so one has to wonder why you're sufficiently obsessed about them to be in a constant state of agitation.
Hands out? More whites are on welfare, boy. The world owes them a living? Then why do rich countries like the USA continue to parasitize the resources and labor of the poorer countries? It sounds like you think you have some sort of natural right to ride on the backs of other peoples. Where did you get that notion, boy?
As you have proven white racism continues today. That white racism negatively impacts blacks today. The continuung human, constitutional, and equal rights violations by whites TODAY means reparations are still due. You and others have been shown how your racism impacts blacks today. But since you don't want to pay and still want to practice racism be prepared to face the national financial losses.
“It will end up costing the U.S. economy as much as $1 trillion between now and 2028 for the nation to maintain its longstanding black-white racial wealth gap, according to a report released this month from the global consultancy firm McKinsey & Company. That will be roughly 4 percent of the United States GDP in 2028—just the conservative view, assuming that the wealth growth rates of African Americans will outpace white wealth growth at its current clip of 3 percent to .8 percent annually, said McKinsey. If the gap widens, however, with white wealth growing at a faster rate than black wealth instead, it could end up costing the U.S. $1.5 trillion or 6 percent of GDP according to the firm.”
Brentin Mock, “White Americans’ Hold on Wealth Is Old, Deep, and Nearly Unshakeable”You talk a lot of bullshit, so you go on up to Mike Tyson and call him what you say you will call black people and see what you get. Bitches like you love Charles Barkely, walk up to him and talk shit. You will think differently about him after he adjusts your attitude. You're a punk son. A white punk behind a keyboard. That's all you are and it's all you will ever be.
Then show me a video of a white lynch mob attacking a random person.
Because black people as a group have a lower reputation and perceived ability than whites or asiansThey do and they should but if race is one of their criteria you're dreaming if you claim "in America employers hire based on merit not skin color". Or can you explain why the same resume but with a Black name gets fewer callbacks?
I think you define racism differently than I doAnd white racism is a thing of the past.
I think you have blown a safety valve with this postThat's not exactly how it happened but we're in a racist forum where some of the moderators let shit like this be said while calling people who counter this crap with the truth racist, or follow them around talking stupud like halfwaite does.
Individuals are still allowed to think for themselvesthey are still victims of racist discrimination in this country. Thanks for the acknowledgement.
No, I use the standard definition of racism. You meet that definition. You aren't holding blacks to the same standards when you ignore the 245 years of white racial preference from 1776-2021.I think you define racism differently than I do
a true racist thinks different races, in this case black people, are genetically inferior
and I dont think that about black people at all
what bothers libs like you is that I hold black people to the same standards as everyone else and let the chips fall where they may
Government has never had a blind eye and it has provided whites with what they have today. Blacks have not earned such a reputation, That is a lie made up by white racists. It is up to non racist whites to get rid of the racism.Individuals are still allowed to think for themselves
the Jim crow laws were wrong
government must have a blind eye and treat everyone the same
but individual citizens are not bound by that and are free to perceive value as they see it
unfortunately black people have earned a reputation that as a group they are less desirable workers
and its up to blacks to improve that perception
< Previous Thread