Female Supreme Court Justices Are Interrupted More by Male Justices and Advocates
A new, empirical study shows that male Supreme Court justices interrupt the female justices approximately three times as often as they interrupt each other during oral arguments. Conservative justices interrupt the liberal justices more than twice as often as vice versa. Even male advocates —...
hbr.org
Well, the numbers don't lie. Female SC justices are interrupted more often than male justices during oral arguments. It has been true for as long as there have been women on the Court.
What a surprise.
What is difficult to document is the reason why this is. Anyone who has spent time with female lawyers knows that they LOVE to talk when they "get the floor." Often, the audience figuratively goes to sleep while waiting for them to GET TO THE POINT(!). They will ramble on, piling exceptions on top of tangents on top of irrelevancies, until you've completely forgotten what the subject was. As a matter of practice, they will talk forever until they are interrupted or stopped; there is no alternative. Which is why female justices are interrupted more frequently than male justices. Males get to the point within a reasonable length of time and females often do not.
But the complaint is heard and goes down as just more proof of the male-dominated culture. In this case, it's the culture of the Supreme Court, but it's only one small part of the "problem." But no male has the cojones to speak up and say exactly why it is often NECESSARY to interrupt one of their colleagues because she is doing nothing but speaking to hear herself speak, going nowhere in particular and making no coherent point.
Does this make me a misogynist?